1,720,988 research outputs found
Ethanol modulates in a biphasic manner hyperpolarization-activated currents (Ih) in rat hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons.
No full textRole of the cannabinoid receptor CB1 in modulation of dopamine output in the prefrontal cortex associated with food restriction in rats
No full textETHANOL MODULATES IN A BIPHASIC MANNER HYPERPOLARIZATION-ACTIVATED CURRENTS (I-H) IN RAT HIPPOCAMPAL CA3 PYRAMIDAL NEURONS
No full textENHANCED ETHANOL CONSUMPTION AND DECREASED HIPPOCAMPAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY IN C57BL/6J MICE EXPOSED TO SOCIAL ISOLATION DURING ADOLESCENCE
No full textMaternal Separation during early life and alcohol abuse in adulthood: synaptic plasticity and functional alterations of GABA and Glutamate transmission in the hippocampus and amygdala of C57BL/6J mice
No full textEthanol reduces hyperpolarization-activated cation currents (Ih) recorded in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons: implication on the inhibitory action on neuronal excitability
No full textRepeated maternal separation in C57BL/6J mice: Changes in hippocampal GABAergic and glutamatergic synaptic function and increased voluntary ethanol consumption
No full textRegulation of the endocannabinoid receptor CB1 and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in food restricted rats
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
