1,720,987 research outputs found

    Increased survival, proliferation, and migration in metastatic human pancreatic tumor cells expressing functional CXCR4

    No full text
    In this study, we have evaluated 11 pancreatic tumor cell lines and tumor cells from surgical samples of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma for expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Six of 11 cell lines expressed detectable mRNA of CXCR4, with three cell lines (ASPC1, Capanl, and Hs766T) having substantial amounts of transcripts. Expression was higher in lines derived from metastatic lesions compared with those derived from primary tumors. Different inflammatory cytokines did not modify expression, whereas IFN-gamma down-regulated and hypoxia up-regulated CXCR4 transcripts. Transcript expression was associated with surface expression in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. All surgical carcinoma samples tested expressed higher levels of CXCR4 than normal pancreatic ducts, which were used as reference tissue. The chemokine CXCL12 induced chemotaxis in CXCR4-positive pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, which was inhibited by anti-CXCR4 monoclonal antibody and by the antagonist AMD3100. Transendothelial migration, Matrigel invasion, and activation of matrix metalloproteases were also enhanced by CXCL12. In CXCR4-positive cell lines, CXCL12 stimulated cell proliferation. The cell line Hs766T produces high levels of CXCL12, and addition of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 partially inhibited proliferation, indicating an autocrine loop. Moreover, the addition of exogenous CXCL12 inhibited apoptosis induced by serum starvation. These results indicate that the CXCR4 receptor is frequently expressed in metastatic pancreatic tumor cells. CXCR4 not only stimulates cell motility and invasion but also promotes survival and proliferation. Strategies to target CXCR4 expressed on tumor cells may be of benefit in patients with pancreatic cancer

    Effects of cryopreservation on in vitro and in vivo long-term function of human islets

    No full text
    Background. The possibility of performing transplantation several days after explant seems to be a peculiarity of islet grafts, and the opportunity to cryo-preserve human islets may permit an indefinite period for modulating the recipient immune system. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of in vitro and in vivo functional properties of cryopreserved human islets. Methods. We used six consecutive human islet preparations not suitable for an immediate transplantation in diabetic patients because the limited islet mass separated. The in vitro function of cryo and fresh islets was studied by determination of insulin and glucagon secretion in response to such classical stimuli as glucose (16.7 mM), glucose (16.7 mM) + 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (0.1 mM), arginine (10 mM), and tolbutamide (100 mu M). In vivo isfet function was assessed through intravenous glucose tolerance tests performed at 15, 30, 60, and 90 days after transplantation of 1000 hand-picked fresh or cryopreserved islets in nude mice. Results. Basal secretion of true insulin was significantly higher in cryopreserved islets than in fresh ones. The response of cryopreserved islets to arginine and glucose + isobutyl-l-methylxanthine seemed partially impaired. Proinsulin-like molecule secretion seemed higher in cryopreserved than in fresh islets in response to all secretagogues used, and the difference was statistically significant for arginine. The capacity of human cryopreserved islets to maintain a correct metabolic control in diabetic nude mice was progressively lost in 3 months. Conclusions. These findings showed that cryopreservation affects the function of isolated human islets, maintaining in vivo function for a limited period of time

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore