1,720,960 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
In Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
Sustentabilidade, um dizer em partilha: o outro no discurso jornalístico do projeto editorial Ecoa e da seção Plural do UOL
Este estudo investiga o modo que o jornalismo institui relações com o outro ao tematizar a sustentabilidade. Nosso objetivo é analisar como o outro atua na constituição do discurso jornalístico sobre a sustentabilidade, a partir de uma análise comparativa entre o projeto editorial Ecoa, do UOL, e a seção Plural, uma iniciativa do Ecoa voltada para produção colaborativa entre o jornalismo mainstream e o jornalismo não-hegemônico. Enquanto os textos do Ecoa são redigidos pela equipe de jornalistas do UOL, Plural se destaca por elaborar textos noticiosos em parceria com coletivos jornalísticos independentes de periferias e favelas, possibilitando a incorporação de vozes e perspectivas diversas no discurso jornalístico. Interessa-nos analisar as divergências entre os discursos produzidos pelo Ecoa e pelo Plural. Para compreender como o jornalismo se singulariza nessa prática, recorremos à Análise do Discurso em conjunção com as teorias do jornalismo. O procedimento metodológico consiste em categorizar temas recorrentes nos textos sobre a sustentabilidade do Ecoa e Plural, identificar os sentidos regularizados no corpus discursivo e analisar como outros discursos intervêm na cristalização desses sentidos. Como resultados, identificamos que enquanto o Ecoa se filia à formação discursiva capitalismo reformado, Plural se insere na formação discursiva ecossocial. O UOL constitui o sentido da sustentabilidade a partir da complementaridade de discursos divergentes, reafirmando sua competência em apresentar múltiplas perspectivas da realidade. Os discursos-outros são definidos no corpus por meio do esforço do jornalismo em delimitar o espaço do outro no interior de seu dizer. Isso ocorre através da demarcação do espaço de Plural no interior do UOL.This study investigates how journalism establishes relationships with the other by addressing sustainability. Our objective is to analyze how the other acts in the constitution of journalistic discourse on sustainability, based on a comparative analysis between the editorial project Ecoa, by UOL, and the Plural section, an Ecoa initiative focused on collaborative production between mainstream journalism and non-hegemonic journalism. While Ecoa's texts are written by UOL's team of journalists, Plural stands out for elaborating news texts in partnership with independent journalistic collectives from peripheries and favelas, enabling the incorporation of diverse voices and perspectives in the journalistic discourse. We are interested in analyzing the divergences between the discourses produced by Ecoa and Plural. To understand how journalism singularizes itself in this practice, we resort to Discourse Analysis in conjunction with journalism theories. The methodological procedure consists of categorizing recurring themes in the texts on the sustainability of Ecoa and Plural, identifying the regularized meanings in the discursive corpus, and analyzing how other discourses intervene in the crystallization of these meanings. As results, we identified that while Ecoa affiliates itself with the reformed capitalism discursive formation, Plural is inserted in the ecossocial discursive formation. UOL constitutes the meaning of sustainability through the complementarity of divergent discourses, reaffirming its competence in presenting multiple perspectives of reality. The other discourses are defined in the corpus through the effort of journalism to delimit the space of the other within its saying. This occurs through the demarcation of Plural's space within UOL
- …
