1,730,884 research outputs found
“Fear of Physics” by Lawrence M. Krauss
No full text“And why does the Higgs exist, if it does? Is there a more fundamental theory that explains its existence, along with that of electrons, quarks, photos, and W and Z particles?”In “Fear of Physics” by Lawrence M. Krauss“Electricity and magnetism are the different ‘shadows’ of a single force, electromagnetism, as viewed from different vantage points, which depend upon your relative state of motion.”In “Fear of Physics” by Lawrence M. Krauss“We appear, with reasonably high precision, to live in a flat universe.” (*)In “Fear of Physics” by Lawrence M. KraussNB: (*) This book was published in 2006. In 2019, my take on this is quite different.</div
Giles, Lawrence M.
No full textLawrence M. Giles. Staff Sergeant, U.S. Army Air Forces. 3 February 1915 - 7 January 1943.
Enlisted, November 1940. Trained at Air Base, Savannah Georgia and Roosevelt Field, New York. Flying as crew-chief, from Charters Towers, Queensland, Australia, on an advanced operational flight, he did not return from over the Coral Sea. Native of Ellsworth Falls. Ellsworth High School, 1932. Bangor resident. A lover of the forests.
11014331https://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/book_of_honor_images/1016/thumbnail.jp
Review of The secrets of alchemy, Lawrence M. Principe
Full text linkReview of The Secrets of Alchemy, Lawrence M. Principe
A simple effective component procurement policy for stochastic assembly systems
Full text linkCover title. "December 14, 1998."Includes bibliographical references (p. 37-41).Jérémie Gallian, Lawrence M. Wein
Marriage record of Covode, Lawrence M. and Roesch, Minneola B.
No full textMarriage license for Lawrence M. Covode and Minneola B. Roesch. Claude W. Duke was the officiant
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
