1,720,967 research outputs found

    Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels.

    No full text
    Monitoring of multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) has been performed in 40 cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SEPs were obtained after median nerve stimulation at wrist, recording from 2nd cervical and from the scalp parietal (ipsi- and contralateral) and central (contralateral) positions. The reduction of CBF due to clamping of the carotid artery provoked SEP abnormalities in 10 of the 40 cases. None of the 30 patients with unmodified SEPs developed post-surgical neurological sequelae. SEP alterations were characterized exclusively by amplitude decrements and latency increases of the cortical components, the subcortical ones being unaffected. In 5 of these patients, SEPs returned to normal values before the end of the intervention and no neurological deficit was observed on awakening. In the remaining 5 cases SEPs retained their abnormalities and patients developed post-surgery neurological sequelae (4 immediately, 1 the day after). SEP alterations affected parietal and central components to a similar extent; however, in a few cases cerebral blood flow deficits provoked by carotid clamping modified differently the central P22 and the parietal N20-P25 waves. Comparisons with stump (back) pressure in the carotid artery revealed a higher sensitivity of the SEP technique in detecting vascularization problems due to carotid clamping. The time course of the appearance of SEP abnormalities seems to discriminate alterations secondary to collateral revascularization from those determined by embolization

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore