1,720,993 research outputs found
Intracranial hemorrhage in an infant leads to the diagnosis and treatment of severe hemophilia B: a case report
No full textBackground: Hemophilia B is a rare bleeding disorder in males, characterized by a deficiency in coagulation factor IX (FIX). Replacement of FIX with a recombinant FIX (rFIX) fusion protein, to sustain therapeutic plasma levels, is recommended as both treatment and prophylaxis to prevent bleeding episodes, particularly intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Case presentation: This case report outlines the management of ICH in a 7-month-old infant with severe hemophilia B, following an accidental trauma-related event, resulting in a thin compound fracture of the left occiput. FIX levels were extremely low (˂1.0%) and large deletions of the coagulation F9 gene (including exons 1–6) were identified. Intensive treatment with a rFIX fusion protein conjugated to the immunoglobulin Fc fragment (rFIXFc) continued for 18 days before hospital discharge. A continuous regimen of weekly rFIXFc infusions was implemented. Thirty days after initiating rFIXFc therapy, neutralizing antibodies or FIX inhibitors (common in patients with large F9 gene deletions) were observed, causing a diffuse skin rash. Such allergic reactions typically indicate progression to potentially serious nephrotic syndrome. A unique immunotolerance regimen of oral oxatomide and intravenous hydrocortisone was started to proactively prevent allergic reactions in this patient during rFIXFc prophylaxis. Even though low titers of the inhibitor (0.6–1.0 Bethesda units) were observed occasionally during subsequent follow-up, there were no signs of further allergies or development of nephrotic syndrome. Conclusion: This is an uncommon case in which rFIXFc was continued despite the appearance of an allergic reaction and the development of FIX inhibitors. Subsequent allergic reactions were prevented with a combination of oral oxatomide and intravenous hydrocortisone given prior to prophylactic rFIXFc. Further studies are recommended to determine the usefulness of this combination with rFIX therapy
Effect of CFTR modulators on glucose homeostasis in children and young adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: a systematic review
Get PDFIntroduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, leading to impaired chloride transport, thickened mucus, and multiorgan dysfunction. Among its complications, cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a major concern, characterized by progressive b-cell dysfunction and insulin deficiency. The advent of CFTR modulators, including ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), has revolutionized CF management by improving pulmonary function, nutritional status, and overall survival. However, their effects on glucose metabolism remain under investigation. Methods: This systematic review (systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251021499) analyzes recent evidence on the impact of CFTR modulators on CFRD in children and young adults. Results: Ivacaftor demonstrates potential benefits in glucose regulation, enhancing insulin secretion and glucagon control, particularly in patients with gating mutations. Conversely, lumacaftor/ivacaftor exhibits inconsistent effects, with some studies indicating glucose tolerance improvements while others report insulin sensitivity decline. Discussion: ETI therapy shows modest but generally positive effects on glycemic control, with reductions in HbA1c and fasting glucose, though without significant changes in insulin secretion. While CFTR modulators improve systemic health, their role in directly preventing or reversing CFRD remains unclear. Further longitudinal studies are needed to optimize therapeutic strategies and elucidate the long-term metabolic effects of CFTR modulation in CF patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251021499
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
