1,721,006 research outputs found

    Does contraception modify the risk of endometriosis?

    No full text
    Long episodes of regular, prolonged, abundant menstrual flows are generally agreed to increase the risk of endometriosis. Since oral oestrogen-progestogen combinations reduce and intra-uterine contraceptive devices increase menstrual flow, an effect on the risk of development of endometriosis in women utilizing these forms of contraception could be expected. Analysis of the most recent epidemiological observations shows no consensus on a possible relationship between use of cyclic oral contraceptives and endometriosis, with an increase, a decrease, and no effect on the risk of developing the disease all being reported. A lower relative risk of endometriosis in previous users of the intrauterine contraceptive device was only found in two series, most of the other data suggesting a rise in risk or no effect. Further studies on the relationship between type of contraception and endometriosis are needed to demonstrate whether the risk of development of the disease could be influenced, and whether well tolerated, relatively inexpensive, long-term treatment might be available for symptomatic patients not desiring offspring

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment before abdominal myomectomy : a controlled trial

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy decreases blood loss during abdominal myomectomy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic reproductive surgery center. PATIENT(S): One hundred premenopausal women requiring first-line conservative surgery for symptomatic intramural or subserous fibroids. INTERVENTION(S): Eight weeks of treatment with depot triptorelin before myomectomy or immediate surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, degree of difficulty of the procedure, and short-term rate of fibroid recurrence. RESULT(S): Mean (+/-SD) intraoperative blood loss was 265 +/- 181 mL in triptorelin recipients and 296 +/- 204 in patients who had immediate surgery (mean difference, -31 mL [95% CI, -108 to 46 mL]). No significant differences were observed in blood loss according to uterine volume, number of fibroids removed, or total length of myometrial incisions. Most procedures in either group were of routine difficulty. On ultrasonography 6 months after myomectomy, four women in the GnRH agonist group and one in the immediate surgery group had tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION(S): Treatment with a GnRH agonist before abdominal myomectomy has no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss. Thus, systematic use of medical therapy before abdominal myomectomy does not seem to be justified

    Pregnancy at forty and over: a case-control study

    No full text
    We compared obstetric prognosis in 327 women > or = 40 years old (148 nulliparas, 279 multiparas) with 20-30-year-old matched controls who delivered at our department between 1988 and 1990. Gestational diabetes and chronic hypertension were the only more frequent antepartum complications in cases than controls (2.4% vs. 0.3% and 3.4% vs. 0.3%, respectively). There were more premature deliveries in cases than controls (19% vs. 8%) but no difference in postdate deliveries. Cesarean section was more frequent in cases than controls in both nulliparas (64% vs. 30%) and multiparas (43% vs. 12%). Incidence of abdominal delivery for acute obstetrical indications was not increased in older gravidas. Significant differences were observed in low birthweight (17% vs. 5%) and 5-min Apgar score < 7 (8% vs. 2%). Most of the abnormal Apgar scores were recorded after cesarean section; values for vaginally-delivered infants were comparable in older and younger women. Perinatal mortality was similar in the two groups

    Adenomyosis: a déjà vu?

    No full text
    Adenomyosis is a relatively frequent finding in series of hysterectomies performed for menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Evident selection biases of the available studies on adenomyosis have always limited the possibilities of defining the real clinical importance of the condition. Until now the only certain diagnoses have been made by histopathologists on uteri removed at surgery, but recently various sufficiently accurate techniques have been suggested which allow diagnosis on the uterus in situ. With the these methods it might be possible to obtain correct information on the epidemiologic characteristics of adenomyosis and to clarify whether it has a pathogenic role in unexplained ovulatory menorrhagia and juvenile dysmenorrhea. Furthermore, resectoscopic treatment has been proposed in some mild forms of adenomyosis to avoid hysterectomy, whereas it seems improbable that medical treatment can offer a definitive solution. The adoption of standard histologic criteria for adenomyosis seems important. Until this is done, it will be difficult to establish whether adenomyosis is really a disease or merely a paraphysiologic condition

    Veralipride for hot flushes during gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment

    No full text
    Hot flushes are the commonest symptom induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa). We performed an open observational trial to evaluate the efficacy of veralipride, an antidopaminergic drug, in reducing hot flushes in 25 premenopausal women treated with a GnRHa for endometriosis (8 subjects) or menorrhagia (17 subjects). The patients received goserelin depot for 6 months and veralipride was added for the third month. Hot flushes, severe in all women at 2 months, improved in both frequency and intensity in 92 % of the subjects during veralipride administration. The benefit obtained persisted until the end of the GnRHa treatment
    corecore