1,720,992 research outputs found
EXAFS-XANES evidence of in operando Caesium reduction in Cs-Ru/C catalysts for ammonia synthesis
No full textWe present here a X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) investigation on the local chemical order and electronic structure of Cs and Ba, promoters of the Ru/C catalysts for ammonia synthesis that attracted interest because of highly increased productivity. The role of the promoters is still largely unclear, although indirect evidence for Cs partial reduction has been obtained by this and other groups. Our XAS analysis with in situ H-2 reduction directly supports the partial Cs reduction in the promoted Ru/C catalysts, depending on the presence of Ru and on the graphitization degree of the support. Higher coordination of Ba was observed with respect to Cs in the reduced samples, without evidence of heavy atoms (Ru, Cs, and Ba) in the surroundings. Because of the strong electropositive nature of Cs, direct experimental evidence of its partial reduction is of outstanding significance also for other applications
Intrazeolite large palladium clusters prepared by organometallic chemical vapour deposition.
No full text
CHARACTERIZATION AND CATALYTIC PERFORMANCES OF ALKALI-METAL PROMOTED Rh/SiO2 catalysts for propene hydroformilation
No full text
The evidence of surface restructuring during ethylene hydroformylation catalyzed by silica supported Na2[Rh12(CO)30].
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
