493 research outputs found
Conjunto de datos de: Excitonic Origin of the Optical Properties of CsPbBr3
No full textThese data corresponds to the raw data used for the publication Excitonic Origin of the Optical Properties of CsPbBr3 by Daniel L. Gau (a), Daniel Ramírez (b), Gonzalo Riveros (b), Patricia Díaz (b), Javier Verdugo (b), Gerard Núñez (b), Susy Lizama (b), Pamela Lazo (b), Enrique, A. Dalchiele (a), Ricardo E. Marotti (a,*).
* Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected]
(a) Facultad de Ingeniería, Instituto de Física, Universidad de la República, Herrera y Reissig 565, C.C. 30, 11000 Montevideo, Uruguay.
(b) Instituto de Química y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Avenida Gran Bretaña 1111, Playa Ancha, Valparaíso, Chile
The International Court of Justice Role in Influencing the Approach of Other Courts on Fundamental Procedural Matters
No full textCorte di Cassazione (Sez. tributaria civile), 24 November 2016, No. 23984 Patrizia Ciofi v. Agenzia delle entrate
No full text
de Guttry, Capone, Paulussen (eds.) “Foreign Fighters under International Law and Beyond”
No full textLa tutela delle unioni omosessuali nel dialogo tra corti interne e Corte europea dei diritti umani
No full textSui recenti sviluppi del caso Battisti: la dimensione interna e le (sue) ripercussioni sulla controversia fra Italia e Brasile
No full textBetween Consent and Effectiveness: Incidental Determinations and the Expansion of the Jurisdiction of UNCLOS Tribunals
No full textThis paper discusses the legal framework within which the jurisdiction ratione materiae of tribunals established under UNCLOS Part XV can be extended, at least incidentally, over non-UNCLOS issues. The analysis illustrates that, whilst UNCLOS Tribunals—like other international tribunals—have an incidental jurisdiction to determine incidental issues beyond the scope of their principal jurisdiction, a consistent and well-developed doctrine relating to such incidental jurisdiction is still lacking. The Chagos award provides some hints about the features of this jurisdiction, but essentially refers to judicial assessments which remain to a large extent discretionary. The same holds true when it comes to the determination of the legal effects of incidental determinations over external issues. In this paper it is argued that further clarification about such prominent aspects of the adjudication of law of sea disputes is needed. This would help achieving a better balance between the principle of consent and the principle of effectiveness in the exercise of Part XV jurisdiction
Of Restoring Compliance, Lex Specialis and Intersecting Wrongs: the Question of ‘Remedies’ in Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros
No full textLoris Marotti and Paolo Palchetti discuss the innovative and case-specific treatment of remedies in Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros, which explains the case’s relatively limited influence specifically as regards the consequences of internationally wrongful acts. At the same time, the Court’s approach finds an echo in the flexibility of the rules on reparation adopted in the framework of the ilc codification exercise
«Plausibilità» dei diritti e autonomia del regime di responsabilità nella recente giurisprudenza della Corte internazionale di giustizia in tema di misure cautelari
No full text- …
