14,316 research outputs found
Cwbr Author Interview: The Union War
No full textInterview with Dr. Gary Gallagher, John L. Nau III Professor of History at the University of Virginia Interviewed by Nathan Buman
Civil War Book Review (CWBR): Today, I\u27m delighted to be joined by Gary Gallagher who is John L. Nau III Professor of History at the University of Virginia to discuss his most recent book The Union War. Professor Gallagher, thank you for talking with us today. Gary Gallagher (GG): Thanks for inviting me
Routes into languages event evaluations in England 2011-2012
No full textThis report presents the findings of a large-scale pilot evaluation survey of Routes into Languages activities in England in 2011-2012. It aimed to collect information on learners’ experiences of Routes events and to measure indications of attitudinal change in the immediate aftermath of events
Aristotle on<i>Eidei Diapherontoi</i>
No full textAristotle holds that there must be multiple forms of human being and those forms constitute a genos, this paper argues. Aristotle advances his claim by arguing that the strength of a polis rests on the existence of a spectrum of useful essential differences among its citizens. The paper rejects the notion that eîdos is a homonym, and argues that it signifies 'form,' not 'species.' Its theses are based on analysis of passages in the Ethics, Metaphysics, Politics and other works. The argument of the paper is compatible with 'individual' or 'particular' forms. The paper also proposes a solution to the issue of 'natural slavery.' © 2011 BSHP.Aquinas Thomas, 1993, COMMENTARY ARISTOTLE; AUBONNET J, 1995, ARISTOTLE POLITICS, V2; AUBONNET J, 1995, ARISTOTLE POLITICS, V1; Barnes J., 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST; Barnes J., 1977, ARTICLES ARISTOTLE, V2, P140; BARNES J, 2004, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; BOSTOCK D, 1995, ARISTOTLE METAPHYSIC, P134; Burnet J., 1900, ETHICS ARISTOTLE; BYWATER I, 1978, ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS; Bywater Ingram, 1894, ARISTOTELIS ETHICA N; Code A., 1984, CANADIAN J PHILOS S, V10, P41; Driscoll J., 1981, STUDIES ARISTOTLE, P129; Frede M., 1988, ARISTOTELES METAPHYS; GALLAGHER A, 1998, NEWSLETTER SOC ANCIE, V9, P1; GOTTHELF A, 1987, PHILOS ISSUES ARISTO, P420; Jaeger Werner, 1957, ARISTOTELIS METAPHYS; Joachim Harold Henry, 1951, ARISTOTLE NICOMACHEA; KAVE J, 1998, EC NATURE 14 CENTURY; KIRWAN C, 1993, ARISTOTLE METAPHYSIC, P177; KUHNER R, 1996, AUSFUHRLICHE GRAMM 2, V2, P295; LENNOX J, 2004, ARISTOTLE PARTS ANIM; LIDDELL H, 1897, GREEK ENGLISH LEXICO; MARX K, 1909, CAPITAL, P28; Newman W. L., 1887, POLITICS ARISTOTLE; PATZIG G, 1990, ARISTOTELES POLITIK, P1; PECK AL, 1937, PARTS ANIMALS; PELLEGRIN P, 1985, ARISTOTLE NATURE LIV, P101; Reeve CDC, 1998, ARISTOTLE POLITICS; ROSS WD, 1924, ARISTOTLES METAPHYSI, pR1; Schumpeter J. A., 1954, HIST EC ANAL; SHIELDS C, 1999, ORDER MULTIPLICITY, P31; SHIELDS C, ARISTOTLE A IN PRESS; Shields C., 1990, HIST FDN COGNITIVE S, P19; SIMPSON P, 1998, POLITICS ARISTOTLE; SMITH R, 1997, ARISTOTLE TOPICS BOO, P88; Smyth Herbert Weir, 1920, GREEK GRAMMAR; SOUDEK J., 1952, P AM PHILOS SOC, V96, P45; Walzer R. R., 1991, ARISTOTELIS ETHICA E; WOODS M, 1993, SYNTHESE, V96, P407; 1992, ARISTOTLE PARTIBUS A, P5824
Incommensurability in Aristotle's Theory of Reciprocal Justice
No full textIn just proportional exchange, under Aristotle's theory of reciprocal justice, superior sharers in a community materially assist the weaker, and receive honour as a reward. Aristotle's economic thought is represented with a system of 18 formulae. Explained are: (1) What Aristotle means when he says that it is impossible for two sharers or their erga to be commensurable; (2) The extent to which the variables in Aristotle's proportions can be quantified. (3) What diagonal pairing (κατ διμτρoν σζυξις) is; (4) How need makes sharers and their erga sufficiently' commensurable; and (5) Aristotle's theory of what is just in exchange. © 2012 BSHP.Barnes J., 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST; Barnes J., 1977, ARTICLES ARISTOTLE, V2, P140; Burnet J., 1900, ETHICS ARISTOTLE; CORDNER C, 1994, PHILOSOPHY, V69, P291; Courant R., 1937, DIFFERENTIAL INTEGRA, V1; Danzig G, 2000, CLASSICAL PHILOL, V95, P399, DOI 10.1086-449509; d'Aquino Thomas, 1964, COMMENTARY ARISTOTLE, V1; Gallagher RL, 2011, BRIT J HIST PHILOS, V19, P363, DOI 10.1080-09608788.2011.563517; Gauthier R. A., 1970, ETHIQUE NICOMAQUE, V4; Heath T., 1949, MATH ARISTOTLE; Hesse M., 1965, PHILOS Q, V15, P328, DOI 10.2307-2218258; HUNT LH, 1975, AM PHILOS QUART, V12, P235; Irwin T., 1999, ARISTOTLE NICOMACHEA; Irwin Terence, 1988, ARISTOTLES 1 PRINCIP; Jackson H., 1879, 5 BOOK NICOMACHEAN E; JACKSON MW, 1985, J VALUE INQUIRY, V19, P99, DOI 10.1007-BF00151422; Joachim Harold Henry, 1951, ARISTOTLE NICOMACHEA; Judson L., 1997, OXFORD STUDIES ANCIE, V13, P147; Kenny Anthony, 1978, ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS; Klein F., 1945, ELEMENTARY MATH ADV; Kranz Walther, 1956, FRAGMENTE VORSOKRATI; Kuhner R., 1898, AUSFUHRLICHE GRAMM 2, V2; LIDDELL H, 1897, GREEK ENGLISH LEXICO; Marx K., 1904, INTRO CRITIQUE POLIT; McKerlie D, 2001, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V39, P119; McNeill D., 1990, PUBLIC AFFAIRS Q, V4, P55; Meikle S., 1991, COMPANION ARISTOTLES; Meikle S., 1998, ARISTOTLES EC THOUGH; MEIKLE S, 1991, J HELLENIC STUD, V111, P193, DOI 10.2307-631900; Miller F. D., 1998, APEIRON, V31, P387, DOI 10.1515-APEIRON.1998.31.4.387; Minar Jr E.L., 1942, EARLY PYTHAGOREAN PO; Nussbaum M. C., 1988, OXFORD STUDIES ANCIE, P145; Olshewsky T., 1968, APEIRON J ANCIENT PH, V2, P1, DOI 10.1515-APEIRON.1968.2.2.1; Patzig G., 1990, ARISTOTELES POLITIK; Peck A. L., 1937, PARTS ANIMALS; Rackham H, 1981, ARISTOTLE ATHENIAN C; Rawls J, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; RAWLS J, 1958, PHILOS REV, V67, P164, DOI 10.2307-2182612; Reeve C. D. C., 1998, ARISTOTLE POLITICS; Ross W., 1955, ARISTOTLE PARVA NATU; Samuelson P. A., 1948, EC INTRO ANAL; SCALTSAS T, 1995, ARCH GESCH PHILOS, V77, P248, DOI 10.1515-agph.1995.77.3.248; Shields C., 1990, ESSAYS HIST F COGNIT, P19; Shields C., 1999, ORDER MULTIPLICITY; SOUDEK J., 1952, P AM PHILOS SOC, V96, P45; Ste-Croix G.E.M. de, 1981, CLASS STRUGGLE ANCIE; Thomson J., 2004, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS10
Embodied Resonance. In: Newen, A., de Bruin, L., Gallagher, S.: The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
No full textMental simulation was claimed to provide a distinctive way of gaining knowledge about others’ actions and thoughts since the late 1980s. A decade later, the discovery of mirror neurons in macaque monkeys and the evidence of mirror brain areas in humans presented a new angle on this claim, suggesting also an embodied approach to simulation. The aim of the present chapter is to introduce and discuss this embodied approach and its role in basic social cognition. In doing this, we shall start by characterizing the distinctive features of embodied simulation (ES), especially in relation to its its motor aspects. Then, we shall provide evidence for the claim that ES may be critically involved in understanding others’ actions. Finally, we shall explore the conjecture that ES might involve a common ground for action execution and observation not only at the functional but also at the phenomenological level
C. J. Gallagher, left and Reverend L. M. DeFalco
No full textTrustee C. J. Gallagher congratulates Reverend L. M. DeFalco, whom the Robert M. Nolan Council, Knights of Columbus.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/16373/thumbnail.jp
L\u27Énigme du retour au pays : deux "romans" de Dany Laferrière
No full textMary Gallagher, professeure à l\u27Université de Dublin, articule sa présentation autour de deux autofictions de Dany Laferrière, « Pays sans Chapeau » 1996 et « L\u27Énigme du retour » 2008
OpenCon2014 in Washington DC, November 2014. Early Career Researchers and Open Access Advocacy
No full textThis paper aims to give an overview of OpenCon 2014, organized by the Right to Research Coalition, SPARC (The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) and an organizing committee of students and early career researchers from around the world that took place between the 14th and 17th of November 2014 in Washington D.C
- …
