1,720,984 research outputs found

    On a uniqueness theorem of L. Amerio and G. Prouse

    No full text
    SynopsisWe give two generalizations of a theorem of L. Amerio and G. Prouse concerning uniqueness of the almost-periodic solution of the wave equation with a local multivalued damping term and almost-periodic forcing.Counterexamples are given which show that these results may fail if some hypotheses of the theorems are dropped. They also show that the two generalizations are relatively independent.</jats:p

    Quali Test psicodiagnostici nelle consulenze in ambito civile?

    No full text
    Occorre tenere sempre presente che non esiste alcun automatismo di abbinamento fra la singola risposta al test e il suo significato psicologico, dato che solo la valutazione globale dell’intero test (o meglio, di piu` test associati), puo` permettere di avanzare ipotesi di tipo esplicativo: ed inoltre, e` bene sottolineare che il test in ogni caso puo` fornire solo ipotesi, e non certezze ne ́ diagnosi articolate. A maggior ragione, in ambito forense le risposte al test non costituiscono in nessun modo una «prova» avente significato giuridicamente utilizzabile: infatti le diverse ipotesi formulate in sede psicodiagnostica e psicometrica assumono una loro attendibile collocazione in ambito sia dinamico-strutturale sia clinico-nosografico sia soprattutto giuridico solo se opportunamente integrate da un colloquio clinico approfondito

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore