12,826 research outputs found
[Stammbuch L v LF]
[STAMMBUCH L V LF]
[Stammbuch L v LF] ( - )
Cover ( - )
Exlibris: Hans Stula ( - )
Einträge, S. 1 - 10 (1)
Einträge, S. 11 - 20 (11)
Einträge, S. 21 - 30 (21)
Einträge, S. 31 - 40 (31)
Einträge, S. 41 - 50 (41)
Einträge, S. 51 - 58 (51
VCC-LF dataset
This is readme for VCC-LF dataset.
This dataset provides light field mat files that capture by Lytro I.
The light field resolusion is [h,w,u,v,d].
If you use these data or our toolkit code, please cite our paper properly
@inproceedings{ lirsiggraphasia2019,
title={Hierarchical and View-invariant Light Field Segmentation by Maximizing Entropy Rate on 4D Ray Graphs},
author={Li, Rui and Heidrich, Wolfgang},
booktitle={ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia)},
year={2019},
publisher={ACM}
Why the binding theory doesn’t apply at LF
This article argues that the relegation of the binding theory to the C-I interface (LF) is theoretically undesirable and empirically unwarranted. Recent Minimalist research has sought to eliminate the binding theory from UG by reducing its conditions to narrow-syntactic operations (Hornstein 2000, 2006; Reuland 2001, 2006; Kayne 2002; Zwart 2002, 2006; Hicks 2006). This approach remains controversial since the canonical Minimalist binding theory (Chomsky 1993; Chomsky and Lasnik 1993) views the binding conditions as interpretive rules applying at LF, supported by evidence that Condition A interacts with other interpretive phenomena assumed to be determined at LF (Lebeaux 1998; Fox and Nissenbaum 2004). While the interaction of anaphor binding and scope relations in particular is not disputed, I show that it is attributable to factors outside the binding theory, namely the requirement that variables (including anaphors) must be c-commanded by their binders at LF. Deprived of its strongest empirical argument, the LF binding theory can then be picked apart
The counter-regulatory arm of the renin-angiotensin system and COVID-19: insights from Gitelman's and Bartter's syndromes.
Disamina preliminare di alcuni test nella diagnosi delle infestioni da protostrongilidi negli ovini.
Prospettive per la coltivazione e valorizzazione del mirto (Myrtus communis L.) come pianta aromatica da condimento
Platelet preparations in neuronal cell differentiation.
Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) is a platelet rich preparation that has the
important feature of a tight fibrin network and containing a large number of growth
factors possessing great regenerative potentialities [1].
The regeneration of nervous system is one of the mail goal of regenerative medicine.
The aim of this study is to test the in vitro CGF effects on both differentiated and
undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells, derived from human neuroblastoma.
To induce differentiation, SH-SY5Y cells have been treated with Retinoic Acid
(RA) 10μM, in both basal and complete medium and in the presence and absence
of CGF. After 72 hours, different parameters have been investigated: the morphological
characteristics of the cells, the cell proliferation, the cellular vitality using the
MTT test, the CGF and/or RA differentiation property and the immunocytochemical
analysis of neuronal specific markers (NeuN, Sinaptophisine, β-III-tubulin, Nestin).
Moreover the NGF (Nerve Growth Factor) and BDNF (Brain Derived Growth Factor)
release have been assayed by ELISA test.
Our results obtained suggest that treatment with CGF, also used alone, positively
affects cell differentiation and neuronal phenotype regulating the expression of the
neuronal markers and improving the outgrowth of neurites.
Taken together these results seems to be promised into new approaches for neuronal
regeneration using platelet preparations
COVID 19, Paxlovid and the lesson from rare genetic diseases with naturally occurring protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- …
