22 research outputs found
Professor K. Rotunda Testimony Before Senate Judiciary Committee, Restoring the Rule of Law
No full textComments in the context of recent discoveries in the rotunda and palatium on the Castle Hill in Przemyśl
No full textZasadniczym tematem artykułu jest analiza wyników najnowszych badań archeologiczno-architektonicznych oraz ich interpretacja w kwestii wzajemnych relacji pomiędzy budynkiem palatium a rotundą prostą wzniesionymi w okresie wczesnego średniowiecza w obrębie grodu przemyskiego. Autorka zwraca uwagę na pewne przesłanki architektoniczne, które zmuszają do postawienia pytania o prawidłową interpretację jednorodności całego założenia. Za uznaniem rotundy prostej jako wolnostojącego kościoła misyjnego w pierwotnym założeniu przemawia jej usytuowanie względem bramy grodowej, potwierdzona dylatacja pomiędzy ścianami magistralnymi części nadziemnej palatium i rotundy, usytuowanie wejścia z zewnątrz do kościoła w miejscu przysłonięcia go ścianą budynku podłużnego, co utrudniało komunikację, oraz wtórne umieszczenie empory we wnętrzu rotundy. Dopiero w drugiej fazie, po dobudowaniu części pałacowej, rotunda zyskałaby funkcję kaplicy z emporą komunikującą się bezpośrednio z reprezentacyjną częścią pałacu, co tłumaczyłoby drugorzędną rolę wejścia z zewnątrz.The main subject of the article is an analysis of results of latest archeological – architectonic research, and their interpretation regarding the issue of mutual relations between the buildings of palatium and the rotunda erected during the early medieval period within the hillfort in Przemyśl. The author draws attention to certain architectonic conditions, which force us to pose a question concerning the correct interpretation of homogeneity of the whole complex. Its location in relation to the hillfort gate, confirmed expansion joint between the load-bearing walls of the ground-level section of the palatium and rotunda, locating the entrance from the outside to the church in a place hidden by the wall of the oblong building which hindered communication, and secondary placing of the empora inside the rotunda, are arguments in favour of accepting the rotunda as a detached missionary church in the original layout. Only in the second phase, after adding the palace section, the rotunda would have become a chapel with the empora communicating directly with the formal part of the palace, which would explain the minor role of the outside entrance
Data to support Zooplankton abundance and distribution along the Mawson coast, East Antarctica - collected on the TEMPO voyage of the RV Investigator
No full textProgress Code: completed<b>Purpose</b><br/>This data may be used to reproduce the analyses for 'Zooplankton abundance and distribution along the Mawson coast, East Antarctica' as part of the TEMPO voyage Special Issue in Frontiers in Marine Science.The data describe all zooplankton species abundance values estimated at each rectangular midwater trawl (RMT 1+8) target and routine sampling site collected during the 2021 TEMPO voyage on R/V Investigator.<br/><br/>During the TEMPO voyage, zooplankton were collected using the RMT 1+8 plankton net and sorted down to the lowest taxonomic level possible. The supporting data set, in CSV format, feature abundances estimated from RMT+1 samples only.<br/><br/>The data file is named allzooplankton.csv. The fields (columns) in the file are:<br/><br/>"Site" – sampling site ID for each routine (RXX) and target (TXX) trawl using RMT1+8.<br/>"Date" – date of each sample collected (ie. target or routine trawl) [dd/mm/yyyy].<br/>"Latitude" – latitude of each trawl [degrees] (-dd.ddddd).<br/>"Longitude" – longitude of each trawl [degrees] (dd.ddddd).<br/>"Chla" – Integrated estimate of chlorophyll-a (mg m^-2) averaged at depths between 10 to 200 m, which aligns with the section of the water column where zooplankton were sampled.<br/>"Depth" – Bathymetric depth estimated at each sampling station.<br/>"MLD_03" – Mixed layer depth (m). Not used in final analysis.<br/>"MLD_05" – Mixed layer depth (m). Not used in final analysis.<br/>"MLD_N2max" – Mixed layer depth (m) where the N^2 maximum is found, i.e., the pycnocline.<br/>"CT_200" – Absolute temperature (°C) averaged at depths between surface and 200 m maximum net sampling depth. Values are derived from in situ CTD measurements at each sampling site.<br/>"SA_200" – Absolute salinity (g kg^-1) averaged at depths between surface and 200 m maximum net sampling depth. Values are derived from in situ CTD measurements at each sampling site.<br/>"IceMeltDays" – Number of days since sea ice melted calculated from daily passive microwave estimated percent sea ice concentration taken from the National Snow and Ice Data Centre.<br/>"m_to_Ice" – Distance (m) estimated from sampling site to edge of ice.<br/>"IceConc" – Actual ice concentration value (%). It is the percentage of an area covered in sea ice.<br/><br/>The remaining columns are zooplankton species abundances (individuals per 1000 cubic metres) estimated from count data, volume of original sample, split of sample analysed under the microscope and calibration of the flowmeter:<br/><br/>"R.gigas" – Rhincalanus gigas, copepod<br/>"C.propinquus" – Calanus propinquus, copepod<br/>"C.simillimus" – Calanus simillimus, copepod<br/>"C.acutus" – Calanoides acutus, copepod<br/>"Metridia sp." – Metridia species, copepod<br/>"M.gerlachei" – Metridia gerlachei, copepod<br/>"Paraeuchaeta sp." – Paraeuchaeta species, copepod<br/>"Pleuromamma sp." – Pleuromamma species, copepod<br/>"Oncaea" – Oncaea species, copepod<br/>"O.antarctica" – Oncaea antarctica, copepod<br/>"Neo tonsus" – Neocalanus tonsus, copepod<br/>"Neo gracilis" – Neocalanus gracilis, copepod<br/>"Stephos longipes" – Stephos longipes, copepod<br/>"Ctenocalanus sp." – Ctenocalanus species, copepod<br/>"Microcal pygmaeus" – Microcalanus pygmaeus, copepod<br/>"Oithona similis" – Oithona similis, copepod<br/>"Oithona frigida" – Oithona frigida, copepod<br/>"Heterhabdus australis" – Heterorhabdus australis, copepod<br/>"Heterhabdus sp." – Heterorhabdus species, copepod<br/>"Harpacticoid" – Harpacticoid species, copepod<br/>"Haloptilus sp." – Haloptilus species, copepod<br/>"Candacia sp." – Candacia species, copepod<br/>"Solecithricella sp." – Solecithricella species, copepod<br/>"Clausocalanus breviceps" – Clausocalanus breviceps, copepod<br/>"Clausocalanus laticeps" – Clausocalanus laticeps, copepod<br/>"Clausocalanus sp." – Clausocalanus species, copepod<br/>"Aetideops antarctica – Aetideopsis antarctica, copepod<br/>"Aetide minor" – Aetideopsis minro, copepod<br/>"Euchirella rostromanga" – Euchirella rostromanga, copepod<br/>"Heterostylites longicornis" – Heterostylites longicornis, copepod<br/>"Gaidius tenuispinus" – Gaidius tenuispinus, copepod<br/>"Gammaridean amphipod" – Gammaridean, amphipod<br/>"T.gaudichaudii" – Themisto gaudichaudii, amphipod<br/>"Parathemisto sp." – Parathemisto species, amphipod<br/>"Hyperia antarctica" – Hyperia antarctica, amphipod<br/>"Hyperia sp." – Hyperia species, amphipod<br/>"Hyperiella dilatata" – Hyperiella dilatata, amphipod<br/>"Hyperiella antarctica" – Hyperiella antarctica, amphipod<br/>"Hyperiella sp." – Hyperiella species, amphipod<br/>"Hyperiella macronyx" – Hyperiella macronyx, amphipod<br/>"Hyperiella dilatate" – Hyperiella dilatata, amphipod<br/>"Primno macropa" – Primno macropa, amphipod<br/>"Hyperoche medusarum" – Hyperoche medusarum, amphipod<br/>"E.crystallorophius" – Euphausia crystallorophius, krill<br/>"E.superba" – Euphausia superba, krill<br/>"T.macrura" – Thysanoessa macrura, krill<br/>"Krill (other)" – unidentified krill species<br/>"Decapod" – decapod species<br/>"L.h.antarctica" – Limacina helicina antarctica, pteropod<br/>"C.pyramidata" – Clio pyramidata, pteropod<br/>"Clione antarctica" – Clione antarctica, pteropod<br/>"S.australis" – Spongiobranchaea australis, pteropod<br/>"Gymnosome" – unidentified gymnosome species, pteropod<br/>"Ptero egg mass" – pteropod egg mass<br/>"Tiarrana rotunda" – Tiarrana rotunda, polychaete<br/>"Traviopsis/Typhloscoplex" – Traviopsis species or Typhloscoplex species, polychaete<br/>"Phalacrophorus pictus" – Phalacrophorus pictus, polychaete<br/>"Rhynchon brongraini" – Rhynchonerella brongraini, polychaete<br/>"Rhynchoneralla petersii" – Rhynchonerella petersii, polychaete<br/>"Rynchonerella sp." – Rhynchonerella species, polychaete<br/>"Vanadis sp." – Vanadis species, polychaete<br/>"Vanadis longissima" – Vanadis longissima, polychaete<br/>"Vanadis antarctica" – Vanadis antarctica, polychaete<br/>"Pelagobia longicerrata" – Pelagobia longicerrata, polychaete<br/>"Iopsilidae worm" – Iopsilidae species, polychaete<br/>"Polychaete" – unidentified polychaete worm<br/>"Furry worm" – unidentified "furry" polychaete worm<br/>"Larval worm" – unidentified "larval" polychaete worm<br/>"Tiny worm" – unidentified tiny-sized polychaete worm<br/>"Tomopteris septentrionalis" – Tomopteris septentrionalis, tomopteris<br/>"Tomopteris sp." – Tomopteris species, tomopteris<br/>"Phalacrophorus sp." – Phalacrophorus species, tomopteris<br/>"Isopod" – isopod worm<br/>"Tintinnids" – tintinnid species<br/>"Neogloboquadrina pachyderma" – Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, foraminifera<br/>"Siphonophore" – Siphonophore species<br/>"Appendicularian" – Appendicularian species<br/>"Ostracod" – unidentified ostracod species<br/>"Alacia hettacra" – Alacia hettacra, ostracod<br/>"Metaconchoecia skogsbergi" – Metaconchoecia skogsbergi, ostracod<br/>"Deeveyoecia arcuata" – Deeveyoecia arcuata, ostracod<br/>"Austrinoecia isocheira (less than 1mm)" – Austrinoecia isocheira ostracod, less than 1 mm in body size<br/>"Boroecoa antipoda" – Boroecoa antipoda, ostracod<br/>"Sagitta maxima" – Sagitta maxima, chaetognath<br/>"Sagitta serratodentata" – Sagitta serratodentata, chaetognath<br/>"Sagitta gazella" – Sagitta gazella, chaetognath<br/>"Sagitta marri" – Sagitta marri, chaetognath<br/>"Sagitta sp." – Sagitta species, chaetognath<br/>"Eukrohnia hamata" – Eukrohnia hamata, chaetognath<br/>"Unknwn chaetognath" – Unidentified species of chaeotognath<br/>"Fish egg" – fish egg<br/>"Larval fish" – unidentified species of larval fish<br/>"jelly nubby tentacles" – unidentified species of cnidarian (with "nubby" tentacles)<br/>"jelly w/no tentacles" – unidentified species of cnidarian (with no tentacles)<br/>"jelly" – unidentified species of cnidarian<br/>"TOTALS" – tally of total abundances across each row (total abundances across all zooplankton species for each sampling site
Tuerkayana rotundum
No full textTuerkayana rotundum (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824) (Figs. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7A, B, 8A–E, 9A–C, 10A–C, E–G, 11A–C, E–G, I–K) Thelphusa rotunda Quoy & Gaimard, 1824: 527, pl. 77 fig. 1 [type locality: as “Océanie” = Guam]; NK Ng et al. 2019: 101, fig. 3B [lectotype designation]. Cardisoma frontalis H. Milne-Edwards, 1853: 204; De Man 1902: 548, pl. 20 fig. 14; Tweedie 1950: 138, fig. 4h. Discoplax pagenstecheri Kossmann, 1878: 255. Cardisoma rotundum – Türkay 1974a: 234, figs. 1, 14 (part); Sakai 1976: 679, pl. 232; Türkay and K. Sakai 1976: 14, figs. 3, 5, pl. 2(1–2); Takeda 1982: 225; Miyake 1983: 188, pl. 63(3); Hirata et al. 1988: 5, 1 unnumbered fig.; Ho et al. 1992: 61, fig. 6; Poupin 1994: fig. 50; PKL Ng 1998: 1151, 1 unnumbered fig.; Liu 1999: 85, figs. 30–31. Discoplax rotundum – Lee 2001: 140, 2 unnumbered figs.; PKL Ng et al. 2001: 49; Davie 2002: 185; Lin et al. 2011: 37, 2 unnumbered figs.; PKL Ng et al. 2017: 97. Discoplax rotunda – Innocenti and Vannini 2007: 635, fig. 1; PKL Ng et al. 2008: 214; Poupin and Juncker 2008: 35, fig. 5d; Poupin 2010: 42 (part); Poupin and Juncker 2010: 56 (part), 1 unnumbered fig. on p. 57; Orchard 2012: 149, 6 unnumbered figs.; Li and Chiu 2013: 65, 3 unnumbered figs.; Shih 2013 b: 28, fig. 9; PKL Ng and Shih 2014: 111; Toyota et al. 2014: 180, 7 unnumbered figs.; PKL Ng and Shih 2015: 382; Li and Chiu 2019a: 98, 3 unnumbered figs.; Li and Chiu 2019b: 2 unnumbered figs. on p. 52. Tuerkayana rotundum – Guinot et al. 2018: 551, fig. 4G; Sasaki 2019: 12702; Toyota et al. 2019: 188, 4 unnumbered figs. Diagnosis: Frontal, epigastric, epibranchial and anterior part of mesobranchial regions covered with numerous small granules and striae, those on anterior part more flattened; mesogastric, metagastric regions almost smooth; posterior part of meso-, metabranchial regions with prominent oblique striae and granules; epigastric regions prominent, margin relatively sharp; postorbital cristae strong, separated from epigastric by shallow concavity; external orbital tooth broadly triangular, margin confluent with anterolateral margin, separated by short narrow fissure or small cleft (Figs. 2, 5, 6, 7B). Merus of third maxilliped subovate, longer than broad (Fig. 7A). Surfaces of adult chelae with low granules on margins, punctate to rugose (Fig. 9A–C). Ambulatory legs short; ratios of maximum length to maximum width of third and fourth ambulatory meri 2.5–2.6, 2.5–2.6, respectively; surfaces covered with striae, appears rugose; dorsal margin of merus rugose, uneven; lateral margins of propodus, dactylus lined with strong, stiff spines or setae (Figs. 2, 10A–C, E–G). Male pleon relatively broad; somite 6 wider than long, lateral margins gently to strongly convex (Fig. 8A–F). Adult G1 almost straight, when viewed from ventral perspective; distal part curved at angle of about 45° from vertical; distal part of outer margin forming gentle shelf–like structure; distal part gently curves towards corneous tip, basal part tapers gradually to truncate tip in dorsomesial view, outer margin appearing gently concave in ventral view, forming relatively narrow triangular flange (Fig. 11A–C, E–G, I–K). Eastern Indian Ocean to Niue. © 2023 Academia Sinica, Taiwan © 2023 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Material examined: Guam – lectotype male (63.0 × 50.0 mm) (MNHN-IU-2000-3745 = MNHN-B3745) [photographs examined], Guam, Oceania, M. Guérin; 1 male (ZRC 2000.568), coll. P.K.L. Ng, October 1996; 1 female (ZRC 2000.567), Hawaiian Rock Quarry, central Guam, coll. 20 April 2000; 2 females (ZRC 2001.703), Merizo, Guam, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 1 August 2001; 1 male (50.2 × 38.6 mm), 1 female (48.2 × 36.9 mm, with hatched zoeae) (ZRC 2000.566), Pago Bay, outside of marine laboratory, University of Guam, coll. P.K.L. Ng and C.-H. Wang, 15-18 April 2000. Taiwan – 1 male (ZRC 1998.471), Pingtung County, coll. H.-C. Liu et al., 13 May 1998; 1 male (53.3 × 41.0 mm) (ZRC 1998.474), 1 male, 1 female (ZRC 1998.432), Pingtung County, Taiwan, coll. H.- C. Liu et al., 22 May 1998; 1 female (ZRC 1998.476), Pingtung County, Taiwan, coll. H.-C. Liu et al., 18 Sep. 1997; 1 male (37.5 × 29.3 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15886), Siangjiaowan, Pingtung County, coll. 2 September 2000; 1 female (39.4 × 31.5 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15887), Dingtanzih, Kenting, Pingtung County, coll. 17 March 2018; 1 ovig. female (33.8 × 25.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15888), Dingtanzih, Kenting, Pingtung County, 27 August 2018. Japan – 1 male (SMF 6382), south of Daito-Jima, Riu-Kiu (= Ryukyu Islands), no other data. Philippines – 1 female (ZRC 2001.312), Tawala Cave, Panglao Island, Bohol, Philippines, coll. P.K.L. Ng et al., 17 December 2000; 1 male (47.8 × 37.8 mm) (ZRC 2008.506), Virata Cave, Panglao Island, Bohol, coll. Manong et al., 26 November 2001; 2 males (ZRC 2008.1005), Hinagdanan Cave, northern part of Panglao Island, Bohol, coll. local collectors, June 2002; 1 male (ZRC 2001.2311), Baloc-Baloc Cave, near Virata Cave, Panglao Island, Bohol, coll. Manong et al., 30 November 2001; 1 male (ZRC 2014.463), Panglao Island Nature Resort, Hinagdanan Cave, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 3 March 2004; 1 male (ZRC 2021.865), station M59, Cambagat Cave, Panglao, 9°37.5'N 123°48.1'E, coll. PANGLAO 2004 Expedition, 5 July 2004; 3 males, 3 females (ZRC 2012.437), outside cave at Panglao Island Nature Resort, Panglao Island, Bohol, coll. P.K.L. Ng and P.Y.C. Ng, December 2010; 1 female (ZRC 2001.2312), Balicasag Island, Panglao Island, Bohol, A. Porpetcho and R. Diaz, 30 November 2001; 1 male (SMF 19745), east Mactan, northwest coast of Hilutangan Channel, Cebu, 10°17'N 124°00'E, coll. A. Schreiber. Indonesia – 1 male (33.9 × 26.9 mm) (SMF), station Ip-1, Ambon, coll. Rumphius Expedition, K. Moosa, 17 January 1973; 1 ovigerous female (ZRC 2010.423), Kri Island, West Papua, coll. H.H. Tan, December 2010. Papua New Guinea – 1 female (SMF 24451), Kavieng, New Ireland, coll. 19 July 1998. Admiralty Islands – 2 males (36.6 × 28.8 mm, 35.9 × 28.3 mm), 1 female (40.4 × 30.9 mm) (SMF 5854), Nissan Atoll, Pinipal, Hanseatischen Südsee-Expedition, coll. E. Wolff, 8 May 1909; 1 female (53.1 × 41.0 mm) (SMF 5855), Pak, Hanseatischen Südsee-Expedition, coll. E. Wolff, 10 September 1909. New Caledonia – 1 male (61.4 × 78.0 mm) (MNHN–B 24813), Easo Cave, 17 m depth, Lifou Island, Loyalty Islands, coll. B. Richer de Forges, 20 August 1993; 1 male (28.0 × 26.3 mm) (MNHN–B 24809), on the ground, Lifou Island, Loyalty Islands, coll. B. Richer de Forges, 18 April 1993; 2 females (38.0 × 48.0 mm, 39.0 × 49.0 mm) (MNHN-B 24814), sea level, Maré Island, Loyalty Islands, coll. B. Richer de Forges, 16 July 1993; 1 juvenile (3.0 × 3.5 mm) (MNHN–B 26947), cave, station 88–066, Ouvea Atoll, Loyalty Islands, coll. T.M. Iliffe and S. Sarbu, 22 June 1988; 9 juveniles (MNHN-B 26948), Loyalty Islands, Luecilla Cave, station 88–058, Lifou Island, coll. T.M. Iliffe and S. Sarbu, 17 June 1988; 3 males (47.2 × 37.6, 47.2 × 37.7, 52.9 × 41.9 mm) (MNHN-IU-2014-10106), Lifou I. (Hnyekej), coll. J. Poupin and M. Juncker, 2005; 1 male (36.0 × 44.0 mm) (MNHN-B 17134), no other data. Solomon Islands – 1 young female, 6 juveniles (12.7 × 16.5 mm) (MNHN-B 26943), Malaita, coll. T.M. Iliffe and S. Sarbu, 27 August 1988. Vanuatu – 2 males (37.6 × 29.0 mm, 37.0 × 28.4 mm) (ZRC 2012.103), Espiritu Santo, entrance of Loren Cave, coll. G. Boxshall, 13 September 2006. Tuvalu Islands – 1 male (42.9 × 34.3 mm) (UF 6316), among breadfruit leaves, area with coconuts, strand vegetation, 2 m asl, Vaiaku, Fongafale, Tuvalu, Funafuti Atoll, coll. L. Kirkendale, 23 June 2004. Wallis & Futuna Islands – 1 female (38.3 × 29.5 mm) (MNHN-IU-2013-13174), coll. J. Poupin, 2007. Niue – 1 male (51.7 × 41.6 mm) (UF 2192), supratidal to well inland, Hakupu area, coll. B. Holthuis and G. Paulay, 9 April 1991. Australian Seas – 1 female (holotype of Discoplax pagenstecheri Kossmann, 1878) (55.1 × 44.1 mm) (SMF 6872) (ex Mus. Heidelberg Cr190, Mus. Godeffroy). Cocos-Keeling Islands (Australia) – 1 male (46.5 × 57.4 mm) (ZRC 1965.12.1.7), coll. C.A. Gibson–Hill, 1941; 1 male, 1 female (ZRC 1965.12.1.8–9), coll. M.W.F. Tweedie, 1941; 1 male (57.6 × 44.5 mm) (ZRC 2013.1074), Horsburgh Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng et al., 23 March 2011; 6 males, 1 female (ZRC 2013.1075), Horsburgh Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng et al., 23 March 2011; 1 male (ZRC 2013.1084), station CK24, west southwest of Rumah Baru (boat launch point), West Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 24 March 2011; 3 males (ZRC 2019.744), within 500 m of landing point on island, North Keeling Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 8 February 2012; 1 female (ZRC 2019.741), within 500 m of landing point on island, North Keeling Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 8 February 2012; 1 female (ZRC 2019.743), station CK 2-14, National Park Camp, central west side of lagoon, North Keeling Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 8 February 2012; 1 male, 1 female (ZRC 2021.866) National Park Camp, central west side of lagoon, North Keeling Island, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 8 February 2012. Mauritius – 1 male (no other data), Mauritius Institute. © 2023 Academia Sinica, Taiwan © 2023 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Colour: The adult coloration of T. rotundum is surprisingly variable. Most specimens tend to have a dark brown carapace, the ambulatory legs are usually dark brown with the joints and dactylus orange, and the chelipeds are reddish-brown to purplish with palecoloured fingers (Fig. 1A, B, E, F). Some specimens, however, are much lighter in colour with yellow to orange chelipeds and ambulatory legs (Fig. 1B, C). Distribution: East Africa (Kenya), Aldabra, Seychelles, Mauritius, Cocos-Keeling Islands, Christmas Island, Japan (Ryukyus), Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia (Ambon), Papua New Guinea, Guam, Ujae Atoll, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, New Caledonia, Tuvalu Islands, Wallis & Futuna, Tokelau, Niue, Cook Islands. © 2023 Academia Sinica, Taiwan Remarks: This well-known species has a wide distribution in the western Indian Ocean to western Pacific (Fig. 13) and the taxonomy has been treated at length by Türkay (1974a: 234). The type of the species is still extant, with Guinot et al. (2018: 551) listing a syntype male measuring 63.0 × 50.0 mm in the MNHN as obtained from “Oceania”. Quoy and Gaimard (1824: 527) had stated in the original paper that the material was from Guam. NK Ng et al. (2019: 101) designated this dried male specimen in MNHN as the lectotype of the species (MNHN-IU-2000-3745). Our material from Guam agrees very well with their description and figure (Guinot et al. 2018: fig. 4G, NK Ng et al. 2019: 101, fig. 3B). Henri Milne Edwards (1853) described Cardisoma frontalis from an unknown locality and his description is too brief to be helpful. Most authors have treated C. frontalis as a junior synonym of C. rotundum (see Türkay 1974a b; PKL Ng et al. 2008; Guinot et al. 2018; NK Ng et al. 2019). Türkay (1974b) discussed the issue with the types of these two species, selecting the syntype of Thelphusa rotunda as the holotype, but incorrectly selecting this specimen also as the holotype of Cardisoma frontalis H. Milne Edwards, 1853. As discussed by NK Ng et al. (2019), the type of C. frontalis is lost and there is no evidence that the specimen(s) of Quoy and Gaimard (1824) and H. Milne Edwards (1853) are the same. They noted that as the synonymy of this species was well accepted and there was no problem with their taxonomy, there was no immediate need to select a neotype for Cardisoma frontalis. With the recognition of a new species from French Polynesia, there is now a problem as it is possible H. Milne Edwards’ (1853) original specimen(s) originated from there. Henri Milne Edwards’ (1853: 204) account for the species is relatively brief and not informative: “Carapace assez semblable à celle du C. carnifex par sa forme Générale et ses crêtes marginales latéro-antérieures, mais s’en distinguant, ainsi que de celle des autres espèces dont il vient d’être question, par la saillie considérable des lobes prégastriques et la profondeur du sillon mésogastrique. Basicérite étroit. Bras du mâle gros et presque de même grandeur des deux côtés; mains renflées; pinces courtes. Pattes ne portant que des poils très courts; le propodite garni en dessus d’une double rangée de petites épines. Patrie inconnue.” [Carapace quite similar to that of C. carnifex in its general shape and its anterolateral ridges, but differing from it, as well as from that of the other species just mentioned, by the considerable projection of the pregastric lobes and the depth of the mesogastric groove. Narrow baserite. Male cheliped large and nearly equal on both sides; swollen palm; short fingers. Legs with only very short hairs; dorsal margin of propodus with a double row of small spines. Unknown provenance.]. It is possible to keep the name Cardisoma frontalis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 by selecting the holotype of the new species from French Polynesia as its neotype. We have, however, decided otherwise because Cardisoma frontalis has long been confused with it and is now generally regarded as the junior synonym of Tuerkayana rotundum. In our opinion, to establish a new name would be less confusing. Kossmann (1878) described Discoplax pagenstecheri from a female specimen from Australian seas (Figs. 2F, 5F); as treated by Türkay (1974a), it is clearly identical to T. rotundum. Innocenti and Vannini (2007) reported a male specimen of T. rotundum from Mombasa, Kenya. The late Michael Türkay passed the first author photographs (Fig. 2G, H) of a specimen he had seen in the Mauritius Institute in the 1970s but has never been published. The adult male specimen (no measurements indicated) is clearly T. rotundum as defined here. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain this specimen for study, but the photograph leaves no doubt as to its identity. The only record from Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean is a photograph of a specimen observed at the Blowholes on the island (Fig. 1F) (Orchard 2012: 149). It is surprising that it is not common on the island; it is relatively abundant on the nearby Cocos-Keeling Islands (Tweedie 1950; present data). Rathbun (1906: 838) listed two specimens of “ Cardisoma rotunda ” from Oahu in Hawai’i but there have not been any records since. Castro (2011: 113) discussed this matter at length and concluded that the original specimens had been mislabelled.Published as part of Ng and Hsi-Te Shih, Peter K. L., 2023, Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae), pp. 1-21 in Zoological Studies 62 (10) on pages 2-7, DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2023.62-10, http://zenodo.org/record/807540
La doble medida en la arquitectura del pasado: El Palacio de Onda y su planta antropométrica
No full textDescribed in this paper, is the methodological process to reconstruct the modular design of the fortified palace of Onda (Castellon) Spain, through its anthropologic plan, and applying the Metrologic Principles unravelled in previous research of the author in this field. Module, axis, size and geometric scheme are identified on the base plan, with digital precision. Different thicknesses of the walls are detected and classified. Verifications are carried out via direct measurements. In this building, the continuous utilization of dynamic modulations are highlighted in the decisive and characteristic geometry of the general floor, as in each of the parts. The variety of the thickness of the walls, the displacements of the axis and the correct tracing of the fortress, also stand out. The knowledge of a common system of proportions used in the past could represent a new paradigm in the study and the conservation of our historical and cultural heritage.Se describe en este artículo el proceso metodológico para reconstruir el diseño modular del palacio fortificado de Onda (Castellón) a partir de su planta arqueológica, aplicando los principios metrológicos desentrañados en las investigaciones previas del autor en este campo. Módulo, ejes, tamaños y esquema geométrico general quedan identificados sobre la planta base con precisión digital. Se clasifican los diferentes espesores de muros detectados. Se realizan comprobaciones mediante mediciones directas. En esta obra resalta la continua utilización de modulaciones dinámicas, tanto en la rotunda y caracterizadora geometría de su planta general, como en cada una de las partes. Destaca también la variedad de espesores de muro, los desplazamientos de ejes, y el correcto replanteo de la fortaleza. El conocimiento de un sistema común de proporciones en los usos del pasado puede representar un nuevo paradigma en el estudio y conservación de nuestro patrimonio histórico y cultural
ON PROBLEMS OF THE IN SITU DISPLAY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS
No full textWithin the complex structure of a „bridge” linking
the past with our days in the field of evolution and
development of both artistic culture and historical
conscience of a society the historic monuments, the
relics of the past, no doubt, have their important
place. In fact entirely particular position is being
kept among them by those of archaeological character
since they relate to times from which no written
records or sources have survived, or are available in
quite negligible numbers.
The advances of archaeological excavations conducted
in the period of the Polish People’s Republic
resulted in a considerable extension of the so-called
source material base, i.e. in enrichment of supply of
materials enabling the insight into the story of formation
of the Polish State. An immense supply of
source materials has led to changes in activities of
such important institutions where they can be popularized
as are the museums.
However, this fundamental change that occured with
regard to the basic form of the museum’s activities,
i.e. display is by far inadequate nowadays. Those
serious objectives that are being set by contemporaneity
before museums are in a considerable measure
concerning the display itself. Today it can by no
means be based on scientific information alone that
has been furnished by archaeology, history of art or
by ethnography. There exists a need to find a creative
agent in its system as it should contain a number
of experiences of emotional nature that are required
by young people, it must emphasize the importance
of direct contact with original objects and more
still — it should prevent the loss of historical and
social receptiveness.
A properly thought modern display method should
avoid any forms of stereotyped presentation whatsoever
that obscures its sense and makes its language
more or less conventionalized. The display space should be handled as a place of action or even to
some extent as a theatrical stage on which with the
aid of exhibits a sui generis performance can be
played. The displayed exhibits do not in themselves
constitute any information — they only form an informative
situation that controls the flow of information
in a strictly predetermined manner.
As one of possible answers to objectives that are set
before archaeological museums by contemporaneity
is to be considered the display of archaeological objects
in situ. The first attempts to cristallize an idea of
archaeological reservation were made in Poland as
early as in 1934 at Biskupin. At present the number
of reservations whose forms comply to definition by
Professor K. Piwocki is ranging as high as to ten.
The author distinguishes two types of archaeological
reservations: I — a simple reservation, and II — a
composed reservation. As the background for such distinction
was adopted the form of relics discovered. As
the most essential element of the in situ display is to
be considered that of proportion between the historical
substance and installations and equipment that are
necessary to secure the appropriate functioning of
reservation and are decisive for the effects and impressions
that can be received by visitors.
With concern to the in situ display of archaeological
relics within the space of an ancient castle the author
suggests that (1) the castle site needs to be immediately
and inseparably linked with its natural environment
which the links should in no way be disturbed
by any modern buildings or other kind of installations,
(2) regardless of the state of preservation of
a castle its shape that survived to our days forms
a part of its historical substance and should therefore
be protected.
The architectural design of display must take into
account the following: (a) the necessary climatic conditions
(i.e. temperature, humidity) under which can
be kept the relics exposed to their action, (b) an
appropriate from the historical and aesthetic viewpoint
display of relics themselves. In his further considerations
the author discussed some examples of
archaeological sites within the ancient castles that
have already been realized as, for instance, that of
Giecz or are now at the stage of designing as those
at Kalisz or Bródno Stare.
Unfortunately, all the three archaeological sites mentioned
above in their architectural designs are far
enough from the required respect for the castle solids
as the latter have seriously been disturbed by service
installations and equipment.
The author of the present publication is responsible
for general design of archaeological site at Sieradz
being discussed here and forming an integral part
of the Sieradz Ethnographic Park. The ethnographic
part will, however, not disturb the natural environment
of the Sieradz castle site as a wide green belt
and plantings accentuating the site occuppied by ancient
castle will ensure the appropriate proportion
between the both parts. As a result of archaeological
investigations the following elements have been
planned as those designed for permanent exhibition:
(1) the 13th-century timber-constructed fortifications,
(2) the relics of brickwork rotunda of the 13th century,
(3) the negative pattern of circumpherential castle
wall built during the 14th century.
To prevent the damage to the castle solid preserved
to our times it was decided that the in situ display
of the discovered relics will be placed at the underground
level. None of installations that are inevitable
for preservation and display of historic substance
will be visible at the ground level.
Both system and rôle of the separate components forming
the whole display on the Sieradz archaeological
site have been devised as follows: Part I — „Prologue”;
(1) Projection of a film devoted to „History of
Sieradz covering the period of the 6th to 15th century
A.D.”; (2) a printed „Guide to Archaeological Site,
Sieradz” having special version for young readers
with a plastic reconstruction of the castle site; Part
II — „Culmination”; Pavilion No 1 housing the relics
of the timber constructed fortifications and those of
rotunda; Pavilion No 2 housing the negative castle
wall pattern; Part III — „Epilogue”; a display of the
movable historical monuments coming from excavations
conducted on the castle site.
It may be said that Parts I and III perform a subordinated,
servicing function thus supporting the main
part of the in situ display and their location (Part I
forming a projection room is housed in an especially
adapted to purpose historic building located within
the „ethnographic” area whereas Part III in the Sieradz
Museum some 500 m from the castle site) creates
conditions favouring the exclusive display of relics
excavated within the castle site.
At any rate, however, the proportion of historic substance
to the necessary safeguarding and servicing installations
remains an open problem in the in situ
display. Nevertheless, it is a duty of every conservator
and designing architect to keep this problem
before his eyes and to make every possible effort to
arrive at its optimum solution
RECONSTRUCTION AND CREATION IN THE RESTORATION OF WAWEL CASTLE
No full textThe damage incurred by the partitioning authorities meant that in 1905 the condition of Wawel Castle was that of advanced devastation. Consequently, its restoration entailed the permanent question whether to recreate the historical form of the damaged elements or rather to introduce new ones, proposed by the designer?
In the first restoration (1881-1882) architect Tomasz Pryliƒski referred to the shape of the Castle from the first half of the seventeenth century. Due to the degree of its devastation and gaps in the documents, a number of elements resembled more design creation than reconstruction. The study served as a base for a restoration project proposed in 1907-1908 by Zygmunt Hendel, which, in turn, became the topic of a controversy involving the Cracow conservators and Max Dvofiák, who opposed the reconstruction of the damaged components and even the removal of the walled up parts of the gallery. The discussion produced a compromise, which proved to be conducive for Wawel Castle. In work completed up to 1914 the recreation of the historical state remained predominant and corresponded to the premises of the scientific restoration of this monument of national history.
This was also the time of several unrealised projects relating to Wawel, in which artistic creation prevailed over conservation principles. The two most important are Acropolis by Stanisław Wyspiański and Władysław Ekielski, and Pochód Królów (Royal Procession) by Wacław Szymanowski.
Adolf Szyszko-Bohusz, supervisor of the Castle’s restoration in 1916-1939 and 1945-1946, proposed more moderate solutions. He achieved, i. a. the recreation of the majority of the Castle interiors, a new composition of the main entrance, and a number of elements in the Castle elevations. The archaeological reservations around the relics of the rotunda of St. Felix and St. Adauctus, and in the western wing of the Castle, comprised truly pioneering proposals. Both contain a creative element, albeit of a new variety, i.e. the conservation arrangement. In the four conceptions concerning the whole Hill, the realised elements were those of greatest value, while the rejected ones were contrary to Wawel’s historical character.
Wawel Hill managed to survive the German occupation unscathed, but was subjected to a number of harmful redesigning ventures. The ensuing damage of the historical complex called either for the recreation of its earlier state or creative reconstruction. The post-war resignation from stately functions in favour of purely museum ones contributed to a new trend. Prof. Witold Minkiewicz negated the conception of monumental buildings, and recognised adaptation to a historical environment to be the suitable solution. It is precisely this current which is represented by the restoration of Złodziejska (Thieves) Tower and the adjoining newly erected administrative building no. 8.
The restoration of the western wing of the palace (Prof. Alfred Majewski) attempted to make use of the “reconstruction” trend combined with partial recreation referring to the general character of the Renaissance interiors. On the other hand, the gate wing interiors have been granted the nature of an architectural reservation. Successive realisations within the range of archaeologicalarchitectural reservations include the so-called inner courtyard featuring a display of the foundations of mediaeval edifices and “The Lost Wawel” exhibition. The author of the shows in the Treasury and the Armoury (Prof. Młodzianowski) applied simple modernistic forms. The reconstruction encompasses the southern section of the mediaeval walls, re-created only to a certain height.
The next stage in the restoration of Wawel Castle has been determined by the realisation of a complex conservation programme, conducted since 1990 under the supervision of Prof. Jan Ostrowski, the present-day Director of the Royal Castle on Wawel Hill. Its premises foresee the inclusion not only of the historical strata of assorted buildings on Wawel Hill but also previous conservation. This approach does not exclude a number of corrections, as long as the essential elements of the historical assumptions had been recreated incorrectly.
The recreation of the Royal Gardens complex remains an important task within the whole programme. Pertinent studies made it possible to precisely reconstruct various architectural elements (design by P. Stępień, J. Smólski, S. Karczmarczyk). A discovered fragment of brick paths from the sixteenth century proved decisive for the future trend of recreating the garden composition, The restoration of the paved surface of the Arcaded Courtyard (design: J. Kisielewski, Z. K. Baster) and the reconstruction of the roof of Senatorska (Senators’) Tower (design: P. Stępień, S. Karczmarczyk) have been treated as a necessary supplement of the Castle’s restoration. For the purposes of the conservation of Sandomierska Tower (authors: vide supra) use has been made of certain elements of the reconstruction of historical forms and contemporary creation, with the assumption of full harmony between the latter and the tower’s architecture. The authors of the restoration of building no. 5, redesigned upon several occasions in the nineteenth and twentieth century, have opted for correcting the elevation architecture by adapting this building to the entire complex.
In the course of the century-long restoration of Wawel Castle artistic creation gradually made way for conservation arrangement. Today, reconstruction and creation are applied cautiously, and are predominated by undertakings of a preserving, securing and museum nature. The revival of Wawel Castle was impossible, however, without the recreation of historical elements and the installation of newly designed ones. The author believes that such solutions should be used with moderation and responsibility as measures serving for the reintegration of the historical monument, and not as a goal in itself
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Epitaph for Roe v. Wade
No full textSince the Roe v. Wade decision was announced (1973), the question of abortion has constituted an important element of American constitutional discourse. This article analyses the most recent decision of the United States Supreme Court on this matter, i.e. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which rejected the thesis that the Constitution establishes the right to terminate pregnancy. It is possible to identify three fundamental points of the Court’s opinion. First, the Court allowed lawmakers to accept an ontological assumption that a foetus is a human being. Second, the decision was rooted in the doctrine of moderate originalism and in the concept of substantive due process, limited by historical factors. Third, the Supreme Court adopted a liberal interpretation of the stare decisis principle, consenting to the overturning of precedents even if they introduced new civil rights. The author contends that it is highly unlikely that the decision will constitute the last word of
American jurisprudence on the question of [email protected] Wrocławski, PolskaAdkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923).Amar V. D., Morse, School Speech, and Originalism, „UC Davis Law Review” 2009, vol. 42.Beckwith F.J., Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, New York 2007.Beckwith F.J., The Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, and Abortion Law, „Liberty University Law Review” 2006, vol. 1.Berger R., Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Indianapolis 1977.Black H. Campbell, The Principle of Stare Decisis, „The American Law Register” December 1886.Bork R.H., The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, New York 1990.Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Butler J., Undoing Gender, New York 2004.Chemerinsky E., Ending Roe is a Pure Exercise of Republican Power, Wielded to Reduce Women’s Freedom and Equality, „Los Angeles Times” 24.06.2022.Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915).Day T., Weatherby D., The Dobbs Effect: Abortion Rights in the Rear-View Mirror and the Civil Rights Crisis that Lies Ahead, „William & Mary Law Review Online” 2022, vol. 64.Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022).Dworkin R., Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, New York 1993.Epstein L., Knight J., The Choices Justices Make, Washington 1998.Epstein L., Walker T.G., Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice, Washington 1992.Fallon R.H., Jr., Implementing the Constitution, Cambridge 2001.Ferrando F., Philosophical Posthumanism, London 2019.Forsythe C.D., A Draft Opinion Overruling Roe v. Wade, „The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy” 2018, vol. 16.Freeman S., Quillin K., Allison L., Black M., Podgorski G., Taylor E., Carmichael J., Biological Science, Harlow 2017.Gans D.H., Reproductive Originalism: Why the Fourteenth Amendment’s Original Meaning Protects the Right to Abortion, „SMU Law Review Forum” February 2022.Gerhardt M.J, The Power of Precedent, New York 2011.Glover J., Causing Death and Saving Lives, London 1990.Greenhouse L., Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun’s Supreme Court Journey, New York 2005.Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Guiness O., The Case for Civility and Why Our Future Depends on It, New York 2008.Horowitz D., Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America, West Palm Beach 2018.Lazarus E., Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall and Future of the Modern Supreme Court, New York 1999.Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Lazzarini Z., The End of Roe v. Wade – States’ Power Over Health and Well-Being, „New England Journal of Medicine” 2022, vol. 387.Levy L.W., Seasoned Judgments: The American Constitution, Rights, and History, New Brunswick 1995.Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).Machaj Ł., The United States Supreme Court Reverses Itself: Sense of Injustice or Public Pressure?, „Przegląd Prawa i Administracji” 2015, vol. C/I.Marcus N.C., Yes, Alito, There Is a Right to Privacy: Why the Leaked Dobbs Opinion Is Doctrinally Unsound, „ConLawNOW” 2022, vol. 13.Nowak J.E., Rotunda R.D., Nelson Young J., Constitutional Law, St. Paul 1983.Norris P., Inglehart R., Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, New York 2019.Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).Peachman K.N., The Need to Codify Roe v. Wade: A Case for National Abortion Legislation, „Journal of Legislation” 2019, vol. 45.Perry S.P, Jipping T., Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: An Opportunity to Correct a Grave Error, Washington 2021.Planned Parenthood of Southern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961).Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Rosenfeld A., Iden S., Abortion, (w:) S.G. Post (red.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol. 1, New York 2004.Rubenfeld J., On the Legal Status of the Proposition That „Life Begins at Conception”, „Stanford Law Review” 1991, vol. 43.Sandel M.J., Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?, New York 2010.Scalia A., Common-law Courts in a Civil Law System: the Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting Constitution and Laws, (w:) A. Gutmann (red.), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton 1997.Simson G.J., Simson R.S., Rescuing Roe, „Legislation and Public Policy” 2022, vol. 24.Singer P., Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics, New York 1995.Strauss D.A., The Living Constitution, New York 2010.Strossen N., Justice Ginsburg’s Legacy: Promoting All Fundamental Freedoms for All People Through Strategic Alliances and Incremental Reform, „New York Law School Law Review” 2021/22, vol. 66.Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).Urbańczyk M., Fight Against Discrimination. Human Dignity in American Legal Tradition, Poznań 2022.Viney W., William James’ Pluralism: an Antidote for Contemporary Extremism and Absolutism, New York 2022.Ziegler M., Abortion and the law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present, New York 2020.28325927
The Sunflower, v.54, no.21 (February 24, 1949)
No full textImages in this collection were made from commercially produced and digitized microfilm, may be of poor quality, and will be gradually replaced by copies digitized by Special Collections from original paper copies. Source material held by University Libraries Special Collections and University Archives; processed by the University Libraries Technical Services. Please contact Special Collections at [email protected] directly for help with low quality images.Article(s): Fountain Room opens tonight: University to be host at premier -- Debate team wins honors -- Bruce Foote convo will be tomorrow -- H.A. Decker leads group -- Olson to represent campus UNESCO -- Forum picture, Hamlet, 'overwhelming success' -- Red Cross plans drive -- University departments are changed -- Local profs hold meeting -- Two music recitals scheduled this week -- Traveling art exhibit shown in Morrison -- Fairbanks lectures at Logopedics meet -- Pyramid victims show one's born a minute -- Greeks rush during week -- Young Republicans elect Buck McEnulty -- Military science professor weds university graduate -- Club to pick Rifle queen -- Noted author of novel writes of Fairmount -- All sorority alumnae will be entertained -- University English head reviews Dos Passos book at Beta Phi meeting -- Club to share funds for aid to France -- Professors have hey-day with 'Follies' performance / Jack Chegwidden -- Faculty musicians present joint recital -- Club corner: Newmans to hold pre-Lenten dance Saturday evening -- What do you think? -- Kemper reveals sources of his famous cartoons / Harold Kemper -- Babbling babes blame 'B's while blubbering bitters blues / Joe Ludiker -- Vox discipuli: Students conduct at 'Hamlet' movie flayed by reader / Harold Kemper-- Whistle poll of W.U. women brings interesting results / Mike Miller -- Department plans engineering banquet -- Ellen Anderson to star at Newman benefit in Catholic club rooms -- Round about the campus / Rankin Griesinger -- Engagement told of three University couples who will marry in early spring ceremonies -- Psychologists meet in discussion group -- Scholarships are offered -- AWS executive board will meet in Library -- Bea Bowman is selected 'Wheaties Sweetie' by cagers -- Snake pit?: Council is amused by names received for new fountain -- Debate Club elects Reynolds president -- Junior class plans dance -- Former debate head is chosen president of Delta Sigma Rho -- School honoring W. H. Isely to be erected near University -- 'Marriage as career' is popular subject -- Jobs!: Competition tough in several fields according to VA -- Annual music festival draws fifty schools -- Interesting!: Crowd jams door as students stop to watch dancing -- College-educated forester demanded in nation's timber /Future Magazine -- English instructor will speak Sunday -- Grad gossip: Many alumni have received new appoint in social, religious and educational activities / Beulah Mullen -- Play 'Taming of the Shrew' being rehearsed by cast -- Science fellowships open to graduates -- Publications board available to hear students' complaints -- Anniversary for ISA -- Art group to be here -- Indian club grows as 21 tribes join -- Earning power of graduates is shown by college reports -- Good!: Thanner, Williams translate letters as public service -- Fred Garlick chosen as cadet commander of local ROTC unit -- Little used religious books delight Hutchinson minister -- Chatter chatter!: Sociology teacher says stuents talk more freely here -- Chemistry head speaks of "chromium plating" at meeting Tuesday -- Vets see K. L. Lewis on dropping courses -- Ah nature!: University offers counselor training for youth groups -- Sipple to attend educators meeting -- University UNESCO Council in second year of operation -- Neon contributes sign to Commons -- Coltrane is elected president of club -- On the air!: Morning Fresh is first program of station WUCR -- Graduates get jobs through club effort -- Missouri Valley Conference claims two of nation's best -- Lennie quits foundation -- Kentucky, St. Louis, Carolina are leading cage contenders -- W.U. parking ticket situation is perplexing at the least 26 / Peggy Arnett -- Students register for campus parking -- Roosevelt College strictly 'non-pro!' -- NCAA considers Wichita as tourney site: Shockers may play host to leading teams in national intercollegiate baseball tourney -- Sportsview!: Time, patience and hard work needed to build all teams / Bob Olson -- ISA women take volleyball tourney -- Teaching vacancies offered by bureau -- Michigan U. proposes to enlarge stadium -- Outstanding cagers 'shun' academics for industrial squads -- Women's AAU cage meet is March 3-5 -- Webster Bs cop intramural cage title -- Cagers drop 39-37 battle -- Election of Student Forum board soon -- Unbeaten!: Small school five has best record of college cagers / Jack Campbell -- West Virginia cager scores 503 points in eighteen games -- Shockers meet Drake in final home game -- Graduates' children are survey topic -- Table tennis sharks prepare for tourney -- Badminton is gaining national popularity -- Copeland is elected campus group head -- Golfers will confer with Gunning Friday about coming season -- Sporting!: Bills coach gives team good advice -- Outstanding gridders join Shocker ranks: Trimble signs four Chicago gridders to freshman squad -- 'Americanism' theme of Library display -- ROTC rifle team seventh in match -- Some fun!: Basketball playday for local women will be Saturday -- Speak the peace!: Illinois University offers fellowships to speech grads -- Spring grid practice starts next week -- French Club guides Merci Train exhibit -- Mat tourney begins soon -- Aggies keep Valley lead -- Forms to be ready in rotunda Monday -- Valley picks grid all-star -- Average education cost greatly increased from '34 -- University first in state to install IBM systemPhotograph(s): 1200 University students jam the sidewalk in front of the Sandra theatre Monday for the special showing of Hamlet. p. 1 -- (Left to right) Joe Kraefels, Jim Nebergall, and Bud Weaver. p. 1 -- Capt. Edgar N. Glotzbach and Janice Claire (Cooper) Glotzbach. p. 2 -- Dr. Earle R. Davis. p. 3 -- Ellen Anderson: She will dance. p. 5 -- Betty Jean Garnand; Phyllis Schmedeman; and Colleen Carolyn Aldrich. p. 5 -- Bea Bowman and Jim Nebergall. p. 6 -- Sherman Culbertson, Jr. p. 8 -- Rex McMurray. p. 14 -- Ken Gunning. p. 15 -- Les Needham. p. 1
Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) latifacies Murao, sp. nov.
No full textLasioglossum (Evylaeus) latifacies Murao sp. nov. (Figs. 4 E, 4 F, 9) Description. Female. Body length 4.7–5.3 mm, wing length 4.1–4.5 mm (n= 5). Color. Tegula yellowish brown translucent. Posterior margins of metasomal terga broadly yellowish brown translucent. Pilosity. T 1 (Fig. 4 F) medially with sparse simple and short hairs. Metasomal terga with neither basal hair bands nor apical fimbriae. Structure. Head wider than long; head length/width ratio 0.85–0.92 (n= 10). Interocellar distance subequal to ocellocular distance. Frons and paraocular area dull, reticulate-punctate. Supraclypeal area (Fig. 9 B) dull, with dense PP and IS with weak tessellation on the entire surface. Clypeal length 1.3 x distance between lower rim of antennal socket and upper margin of clypeus, with moderately dense PP on upper 2 / 3, and with sparse larger shallow PP on lower 1 / 3; IS with weak tessellation on upper 2 / 3, and smooth on lower 1 / 3. Basal area of labrum 2.6 x as wide as long; distal process without lateral projection; keel of distal process broad, apically bluntly pointed in frontal view. Scape length approximately 0.6 mm (n= 5). Mesoscutum (Fig. 9 C, D) shiny, with dense PP and IS with distinct tessellation on the entire surface. Mesoscutellum (Fig. 9 E) shiny, marginally and longitudinally with moderately PP; IS with weak tessellation on the entire surface. Mesepisternum (Fig. 9 F) shiny, with dense PP and IS nearly smooth on upper area, and with weak rugulae on lower area. Propodeal dorsum (Fig. 9 H) nearly as long as mesoscutellum, and 1.2 x metanotum, dorsomedially with longitudinal ridges on basal 2 / 3 and weak tessellation on apical 1 / 3; lateral slope, propodeal side, and shield with weak tessellation. Inner hind tibial spur (Fig. 9 I) with 2–5 teeth (n= 5). T 1 (Fig. 4 F) with weak lineolation on the entire surface, and medially with sparse obscure PP. T 2 –T 4 similar lineolation with T 1 on the entire surface. Male. Unknown. Remarks. The species code sp. Y– 1 reported by Maeta et al. (2004) corresponds to this new species. Within the sexstrigatum -group, this species is similar to Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) zipangu Ebmer & Sakagami from the southern Ryukyus. For the differences between the species see the key. So far as the first author surveyed in Iriomote-jima, this species was found from open land to humid or dry subtropical forest. Etymology. The specific name is derived from the broad head. Distribution. Japan (southern Ryukyus: Ishigaki-jima, Iriomote-jima). Flight records. Female: February to November. Flower records. The flowering plants visited by this species were six species in five families listed as follows. Apiaceae: Oenanthe javanica var. japonica. Aquifoliaceae: Ilex rotunda. Euphorbiaceae: Mallotus japonicus. Rubiaceae: Ophiorrhiza kuroiwae. Rutaceae: Tetradium glabrifolium var. glaucum; Zanthoxylum ailanthoides var. ailanthoides. Type material. Holotype (Type No. ELKU 3307): female, Shirahama-rindô, Iriomote-jima, Okinawa Pref., Ryukyus, JAPAN, 18. v. 2007 (R. Murao leg., RMPC). Paratypes: [Ryukyus: JAPAN] Ishigaki-jima, Okinawa Pref.: 2 females, Botanical Garden Banna, 6. vi. 1974 (H. Makihara, ELKU); 1 female, Mt. Karayama, 14–18. iii. 1964 (M. Yoshimoto, ELKU); 1 female, Mt. Kawara-dake, 14. iii. 1964 (S. Kimoto, ELKU); Yonehara, 15. iii. 1964 (T. Shirôzu, ELKU). Iriomote-jima, Okinawa Pref.: 6 females, 12–15. vii. 2002 (Y. Maeta, MCDS), 14–18. ix. 2003 (Y. Maeta, MCDS), 6–9. xi. 2003 (Y. Maeta, MCDS), 22–27. vii. 2007 (Y. Maeta, MCDS); 4 females, Funaura, 5. ii. 2008 (K. Mitai, RMPC), 15. iv. 1979 (H. Makihara, ELKU); 26. vii. 2005 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU); 8 females, same data as the holotype; 3 females, Shirahama, 4. x. 1963 (Y. Hirashima, ELKU), 7. x. 1963 (Y. Hirashima, ELKU); 2 females, Shirahama, Shirine, 23–27. iv. 2004 (T. Mita, RMPC); 6 females, same locality as the holotype, 18. v. 2007 (R. Murao, RMPC), 20. v. 2007 (R. Murao, RMPC), 21. v. 2007 (R. Murao, RMPC); 1 female, TBRC campus, 7. iv. 2004 (H. Hannan, MCDS); 1 female, Ushiku-mori, 3–7. xi. 1963 (G. A. Samuelson, ELKU). Type depository. The holotype and 29 paratypes are deposited in ELKU, and seven paratypes in MCDS.Published as part of Murao, Ryuki, Tadauchi, Osamu, Goubara, Masashi & Maeta, Yasuo, 2010, Taxonomy of the carinaless group of Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, with description of seven new species, pp. 1-33 in Zootaxa 2669 on pages 16-18, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27643
