1,721,252 research outputs found
Actinodaphne lanceolata (Lauraceae), an overlooked and misinterpreted name, replaces A. hookeri, and the consequent typification of five names
Chakrabarty, Tapas, Krishna, Gopal, Kumar, Anand (2021): Actinodaphne lanceolata (Lauraceae), an overlooked and misinterpreted name, replaces A. hookeri, and the consequent typification of five names. Phytotaxa 508 (1): 59-67, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.508.1.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.508.1.
Rediscovery of Morina ludlowii (Caprifoliaceae): An overlooked species from India
Kumar, Rahul, Krishna, Gopal, Kumar, Vikas (2023): Rediscovery of Morina ludlowii (Caprifoliaceae): An overlooked species from India. Phytotaxa 591 (2): 177-180, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.591.2.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PD
FIGURE 2. Garcinia stipulata T. Anderson, with a in Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India
FIGURE 2. Garcinia stipulata T. Anderson, with a fruit.Published as part of Ranjan, Vinay, Kumar, Anant & Krishna, Gopal, 2022, Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India, pp. 118-124 in Phytotaxa 577 (1) on page 120, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.577.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/751756
FIGURE 3 in Actinodaphne lanceolata (Lauraceae), an overlooked and misinterpreted name, replaces A. hookeri, and the consequent typification of five names
FIGURE 3. Lectotype of Actinodaphne heterophylla Blume (L0035461) Available at: https://data.biodiversitydata.nl/naturalis/specimen/L%20%200035461Published as part of Chakrabarty, Tapas, Krishna, Gopal & Kumar, Anand, 2021, Actinodaphne lanceolata (Lauraceae), an overlooked and misinterpreted name, replaces A. hookeri, and the consequent typification of five names, pp. 59-67 in Phytotaxa 508 (1) on page 64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.508.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/542578
FIGURE 3 in Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India
FIGURE 3. Lectotype of Garcinia stipulata T. Anderson housed at CAL (CAL0000005830, Image).Published as part of Ranjan, Vinay, Kumar, Anant & Krishna, Gopal, 2022, Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India, pp. 118-124 in Phytotaxa 577 (1) on page 121, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.577.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/751756
FIGURE 2 in Asystasia venui (Justicieae: Acanthaceae): A new species from West Bengal, India
FIGURE 2. Asystasia venui: A. Habit; B. Leaves; C. Front view of flower; D. Bract; E. Bracteoles; F. Dorsal view of calyx splits open; G. Ventral view of calyx splits open; H. Lateral view of corolla with calyx; I. Dorsal view of corolla splits open; J. Ventral view of corolla splits open; K. One pair of stamens; L. Style with calyx; M. Ovary; N. Disc; O. Fruits; P. Seeds. (Photographed by Anant Kumar)Published as part of Kumar, Anant, Krishna, Gopal & Bhattacharjee, Avishek, 2023, Asystasia venui (Justicieae: Acanthaceae): A new species from West Bengal, India, pp. 239-247 in Phytotaxa 600 (4) on page 242, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.600.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/809394
FIGURE 1. Garcinia stipulata T in Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India
FIGURE 1. Garcinia stipulata T. Anderson (A) Male inflorescence twig. (B) Sepal. (C) Petal. (D) Annular mass of stamens. (E) Pistillode after removing stamens. (F) Anther. (G) Female twig with fruit. (H) Female flower bud. (I) Female flower showing sepals, ovary and peltate stigma without petals.Published as part of Ranjan, Vinay, Kumar, Anant & Krishna, Gopal, 2022, Second-step lectotypification of Garcinia stipulata (Clusiaceae) and its recollection from Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, India, pp. 118-124 in Phytotaxa 577 (1) on page 119, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.577.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/751756
Morina Linnaeus 1753
Identification Key to Morina L. in India:— 1a. Fertile anthers 4.............................................................................................................................................................. M. nepalense 1b. Fertile anthers 2..................................................................................................................................................................................2 2a. Involucral bracts connate at the base forming a shallow cup; involucel teeth 1/2 or less as long as tube.................... M. polyphylla 2b. Involucral bracts free; involucel teeth at least 2/3 as long as tube.....................................................................................................3 3a. Leaves entire or slightly toothed; flowers usually 20 or more close-packed whorls, 8–12 flowers in each whorls........ M. ludlowii 3b. Leaves lobed; flowers few, distantly arranged in whorls...................................................................................................................4 4a. Flowers yellow; stamen filament about half as long as corolla lobe............................................................................ M. coulteriana 4b. Flowers white or pink or pinkish-white; stamen filaments longer than half of corolla lobe..............................................................5 5a. Calyx entire or emarginate; stamen filaments ca 10 mm long............................................................................................ M. persica 5b. Calyx lobes bi-fid; stamen filaments 1–3 mm long......................................................................................................... M. longifoliaPublished as part of Kumar, Rahul, Krishna, Gopal & Kumar, Vikas, 2023, Rediscovery of Morina ludlowii (Caprifoliaceae): An overlooked species from India, pp. 177-180 in Phytotaxa 591 (2) on page 179, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.591.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/779744
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
