128,563 research outputs found
F. W. Kohl to Horace Kephart January 6, 1916
No full textIn a letter to Horace Kephart on January 6, 1916, F. W. Kohl responds to Kephart’s inquiries about the Klondyke Kamp Kooker, a durable and reliable camping stove.J. B. Barlow, Jr. J. G. S.eliii F. W. Kohl C. A. Kohl
itseomm Jan. 6, 1916.
Automobile Supplies
Mr. Horace Kephart,
Bryson City, I. C.
Dear Sir:
Enclosed find our circular describing our Elondyke
Kamp Kooker, which is in answer to your inquiry of Dec. 31st,
We are sure that you will find this Kamp Stove most
convenient for camping on account of its compactness, its
lightness and its durability. The pipe, oven and grub-box
can he placed inside of the stove when not in use, and when
the whole stove is packed ready for shipment it only weighs
about sixty pounds.
The one great feature of this Kooker is, that it takes
28" wood, doing away with having to cut your wood in so
many pieces, as you have to do in all other camp stoves.
Reeling certain that were you to buy one of these
camp stoves, you would be more than delighted with it, and
hoping to hear from you with an order, we are,
Yours very truly,
BARLOW & SEELIG CO,
BY'
FE.JY
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Sphex nigrohirtus KOHL 1895
No full textSphex nigrohirtus KOHL 1895 2 (compared with det. Kohl, NHMW) U g a n d a: 1, 20-50 km NEE Fort Portal, 26.XI.2001, leg. Snizek. Z i m b a b w e -E:1, Chirinda Forest Land, Mt. Selinda, 24.I.1998, leg. Ma. Halada. Sphex nitidiventris SPINOLA 1851 1 (compared with type S. neotropicus (syn.) det. Kohl, NHMW) E c u a d o r:1, Napo prov., 8 km S Tena, Puerto Napo, 400m, 16.-22.II.2002, leg. Ma. Halada.Published as part of Dollfuss, H., 2008, The Sphecini Wasps of the Genera Chilosphex BOHART & MENKE, Isodontia PATTON, Palmodes KOHL, Prionyx VANDER LINDEN and Sphex LINNAEUS of the " Biologiezentrum Linz " - Collection in Linz, Austria, (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Sphecidae), pp. 1399-1434 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 40 (2) on page 1429, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.543113
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Bembix latebrosa KOHL 1909
No full text<i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909 <p> <i>Bembex latebrosa</i> n.sp.: KOHL 1909: 373 (descr., Madagascar), 374 (figs 5-8).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: ARNOLD 1945: 79 (key), 82 (tax., descr., figs 57, 57a, b, Madagascar).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: LOHRMANN 1948: 422 (cat.), 449 (tax.).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: LECLERCQ 1960: 100 (Madagascar).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: LECLERCQ 1961c: 103 (key), 104 (key), 105 (tax., Madagascar).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: BOHART & MENKE 1976: 547 (cat.).</p> <p> <i>Bembix latebrosa</i> KOHL, 1909: PULAWSKI 2003: 795 (cat. Madagascar).</p> <p>D i s t r i b u t i o n Madagascar: Prov. Mahajanga: Amborovy, Ankarafantsika, Mahatazana – Prov. Fianarantsoa: Ranohira – Prov. Toliara: Ambovombe, Behara, Bekily, Fort Dauphin, Sakaraha, Toliara.</p> <p>Endemic.</p>Published as part of <i>Madl, M., 2014, Annotated catalogue of the Ampulicidae, Crabronidae and Sphecidae (Hymenoptera) of the Malagasy subregion, pp. 933-1039 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 46 (2)</i> on page 944, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5312608">10.5281/zenodo.5312608</a>
Megachile (Eutricharaea) naevia Kohl 1906
No full textMegachile (Eutricharaea) naevia Kohl, 1906 (Figs 94–98) Megachile argentata Fabricius, 1793: KIRBY (1903): 250 (misidentification). Megachile naevia Kohl, 1906: 15 (type locality: Socotra, Ras Shoab). Megachile naevia Kohl, 1907: 183 (junior homonym and objective synonym). Material examined. Sokotra: Ras Shoab, 1 J (lectotype), 1 ♀, i.1899, O. Simony lgt., F. Kohl det., D. B. Baker revid. (NHMW); Noged plain (sand dunes), Sharet Halma vill. env., 20 m, 12°21.9′N, 54°05.3′E, 1 ♀, 10.–11. xi.2010, J. Hájek lgt. (NMPC). Distribution. Endemic to Socotra: Jena-agahan, Homhil (KIRBY 1903); Ras Shoab (KOHL 1906, 1907).Published as part of Straka, Jakub, Batelka, Jan & Pauly, Alain, 2017, Bees of the Socotra Archipelago (Hymenoptera: Anthophila), their biogeography and association with parasites, pp. 183-219 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae (Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae) (Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae) 57 on page 208, DOI: 10.1515/aemnp-2017-0118, http://zenodo.org/record/532421
Ammophila strumosa Kohl 1906
No full textAmmophila strumosa Kohl, 1906 (Map 20) Ammophila quadraticollis strumosa, Kohl 1906. Annalen des kaiserlich-königlichen naturhistorischen Hofmuseums. Wien, 21: 355. Ammophila quadraticollis var. strumosa: von Schulthess, 1926: 209 (Gafsa). Ammophila strumosa: Dollfuss, 2013 b: 584 (Gafsa). New records (Total 1 ♀ ). Sidi Bouzid: Bouhedma National Park, 1 ♀ (Dumont Collection, MNHN). General distribution. Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Western Sahara (Dollfuss 2013a, 2013 b).Published as part of Khedher, Hassib Ben, Yildirim, Erol, Braham, Mohamed & Ljubomirov, Toshko, 2020, First checklist of Tunisian sphecid wasps (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) with new and additional records, pp. 301-327 in Zootaxa 4801 (2) on page 307, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4801.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/390048
Ophion rufoniger Kohl 1905
No full text<i>Ophion rufoniger</i> Kohl, 1905 <p>Figs 16A‒B, F</p> <p> <i>Ophion rufoniger</i> Kohl, 1905: 223. Lectotype ♀ female from Azerbaijan in NHMW, examined.</p> <p> <b>Material examined</b>: <b>IRAN</b>: 1♀, Esfan dagheh-Djirouft, 20 Apr. 1971, Saf Zair leg. (HMIM).</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>: <i>Ophion rufoniger</i> (Figs 16A‒B, F) was described from Goygol in Northwestern Azerbaijan (Kohl, 1905). It is a very rarely recorded species also known from Armenia and Georgia. The species is quite easily determined based on the buccate head and the dark reddish brown body with mainly black metasoma and legs. The depicted female specimen is from Georgia and housed in OÖLM.</p>Published as part of <i>Johansson, Niklas, Ameri, Ali, Riedel, Matthias, Talebi, Ali Asghar & Ebrahimi, Ebrahim, 2021, Contribution to the Ophioninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) of Iran with the description of 16 new species and an illustrated key to the Eremotylus of the Western Palaearctic, pp. 151-206 in Zootaxa 5023 (2)</i> on page 184, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5023.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5225655">http://zenodo.org/record/5225655</a>
Sphex decipiens KOHL 1895
No full textSphex decipiens KOHL 1895 8 (compared with type det. Kohl, NHMW) N a m i b i a 1, 15 km E Swakopmund, 8.II.1993, leg. J. Gusenleitner; 1, 90 km NE Grootfontein, 16.I.1993, leg. J. Gusenleitner. R S A:1, Eastern Cape, 30 km W Grahamstown Olifantskop pass, 25.I.2000, leg. J. Halada; 2, O. F. S., 30 km N Colesberg orange riv., 26.XI.2002, leg. M. Halada; 2, North, West, 20 km W Bothaville Kerksdorp Vaal Riv., 31.I.2001, leg. Snizek; 1, W Cape, Clanvilliam Pakhwispas, 17.I.2001, leg. Snizek.Published as part of Dollfuss, H., 2008, The Sphecini Wasps of the Genera Chilosphex BOHART & MENKE, Isodontia PATTON, Palmodes KOHL, Prionyx VANDER LINDEN and Sphex LINNAEUS of the " Biologiezentrum Linz " - Collection in Linz, Austria, (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Sphecidae), pp. 1399-1434 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 40 (2) on page 1419, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.543113
Ammophila erminea KOHL 1901
No full text<i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901 <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> n.sp.: KOHL 1901: 156 (description ♀ ♁, Assab), pl. 7 (figs. 11, 14).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: KOHL 1906: 258 (key ♀), 268 (key ♁), 365 (taxonomy, description ♀ ♁, Assab), pl. 13 (figs. 152, 154).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila</i> (<i>Ammophila</i>) <i>erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: LECLERCQ 1955: 77 (catalogue Africa: "bords de la mer rouge" – KOHL 1901, 1906), 99 (tab. 1: distribution in Africa).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: BOHART & MENKE 1976: 153 (synonym of Ammophila rubripes SPINOLA, 1838).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: GUICHARD 1988: 128 (taxonomy).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: DOLLFUSS 1989: 7 (type catalogue Natural History Museum Vienna), 17 (type catalogue Natural History Museum Vienna).</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> KOHL, 1901: DOLLFUSS 2013: 388 (key ♀), 397 (key ♁), 428 (taxonomy, lectotype designation (Egypt = Sudan), description ♀ ♁, record from Eritrea not mentioned), 514 (fig. 40), 542 (fig. 381), 547 (fig. 451), 551 (fig. 515), 554 (fig. 569).</p> <p>D i s t r i b u t i o n:Assab.</p> <p> <i>Ammophila erminea</i> is known from the Afrotropical (Eritrea, Sudan), Oriental and Palaearctic (e.g. Bahrein, Quatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen) regions. GUICHARD (1988: 128) revived the specific status of <i>Ammophila erminea</i> based only on material of the Natural History Museum in London identified by J. de Beaumont. DOLLFUSS (2013: 428) designated the lectotype (Egypt, 1 ♀ 1858, Natterer). J.F Natterer (28.05.1819 – 17.12.1862) collected in today’s Sudan and not in Egypt. Natterer’s material was acquisited during his visit to Vienna in 1858.</p>Published as part of <i>Madl, Michael, D, Chalybion, L, Chlorion, S, Podalonia, V, Prionyx & K, Sceliphron, 2023, A catalogue of the family Sphecidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) of Eritrea, pp. 563-572 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 54 (2)</i> on page 564, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10414555">10.5281/zenodo.10414555</a>
- …
