1,720,974 research outputs found
β2-Microglobulin and low-flux synthetic dialyzers
The aim of this study was to compare the effect on β2-microglobulin (β2-M) plasma levels of dialyzers with 3 low-flux synthetic membranes and regenerated cellulose (Cuprophan) in 12 chronic dialysis patients. The Synthetic membrane materials chosen were low-flux polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), low-flux polysulfone (PS 400), and polycarbonate-polyether (Gambrane). Adequate and comparable removal of small solutes was provided by dialyzers with all 4 membrane materials used under similar conditions. A significant reduction of β2-M plasma levels was seen only with Gambrane while the other 2 synthetic membrane materials gave rise to increases similar to those known to occur with Cuprophan. After correction for the hemoconcentration caused by ultrafiltration, dialysis with Gambrane showed a 24% lower plasma β2-M level while the β2-M concentrations with the other 3 membrane materials were practically unchanged. In addition, the efficiency of Gambrane dialyzers in β2-M removal was able to significantly lower the predialysis plasma β2-M levels after only 5 dialysis sessions. The hemocompatibility of the 3 synthetic low-flux membranes as judged by the white blood cell (WBC) count and complement activation was similar and therefore cannot be used to explain the different β2-M plasma levels. In anticipation of gaining further insight into the mechanisms of accumulation and deposition of β2-M in dialysis patients, a worthwhile approach may be to use a low-flux membrane such as Gambrane which combines removal with protection against potential activating factors in the dialysis fluid
FROM PATHOPHYSIOLOGY TO CLINICAL HEMODIALYSIS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT MILLENIUM Kidney International
A comparison of dialysers with low-flux membranes: Significant differences in spite of many similarities
The solute removal characteristics and haemocompatibility of low-flux dialysers containing Cuprophan(TM), cellulose acetate, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polycarbonate-polyether (Gambrane(TM)) membranes were compared in a multicentre cross-over clinical trial. While all four dialysers provided comparable removal of urea and creatinine, the dialyser containing PMMA membrane showed a reduced ability to remove phosphate compared to that containing Cuprophan membrane. Significant β2-microglobulin removal was obtained with the dialyser containing Gambrane membrane, whereas the other three dialysers had no impact on plasma β2-microglobulin concentrations. The ability to activate complement, measured as changes in the plasma concentrations of C3a des Arg and the terminal complement complex, and to produce leukopenia was greater for the dialyser containing Cuprophan membrane than for the other three. The ability to activate complement and cause leukopenia was not consistent among the remaining three dialysers and the degree of leukopenia could not be predicted from the level of complement activation. Neutrophil degranulation, as indicated by the release of elastase-α1-proteinase inhibitor, occurred to a greater extent with the dialysers containing Cuprophan and Gambrane membranes. None of the dialysers was overtly thrombogenic as judged by changes in platelet count and plasma concentrations of the thrombin-antithrombin III complex. Our results demonstrate that although there are many similarities between dialysers containing low-flux membranes, there are also significant differences. These differences may enable improvements in therapy, while allowing continued use of low-flux dialysers
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
