1,721,036 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Arthroscopic Debridement of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears — A Comparison of Debridement Alone and Combined Procedure with Biceps Tenotomy
No full textThe goal of the study was to compare the results of arthroscopic debridement in massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears with and without tenotomy of the long head of the biceps (LHB). We evaluated 41 patients who were treated by a single surgeon for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears either by arthroscopic debridement alone (24 patients) or with additional tenotomy of LHB (17 patients). The mean age was 67 years (range : 61 to 82 years) and the average follow-up was 31 months (range : 24 to 48 months). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, pain, function, and follow-up. All patients had significant disabling pain weakness preoperatively. Assessments were made using the Constant score. The average Constant score for the group without LHB tenotomy improved from a mean of 39 points (range : 19 to 54 points) preoperatively to a mean of 67 points (range : 41 to 87 points) and for the group with additional LHB tenotomy from a mean of 41 points (range : 16 to 54 points) preoperatively to a mean of 69 points (range : 49 to 87 points) at the time of follow-up. The radiological study showed no significant narrowing of the subacromial space. No statistical significance (P > .05) was found between the two groups. However, patients with additional LHB tenotomy had a longer duration of postoperative pain relief, but final pain score difference was not statistically significant. There was no complication related to the procedure. Arthroscopic debridement of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears provides reliable expectation for improvement in function, decrease in pain, and improvement in shoulder scores for most patients. Additional LHB tenotomy did not significantly influence the postoperative results at the latest follow-up. In our series we noted no significant humeral head migration or developing rotator cuff arthropathy
Rotator cuff repair: single- vs double-row. Clinical and biomechanical results
No full textBackground. The goal of rotator cuff repair is a high initial mechanical stability as a requirement for adequate biological recovery of the tendon-to-bone complex. Notwithstanding the significant increase in publications concerning the topic of rotator cuff repair, there are still controversies regarding surgical technique. Objectives. The aim of this work is to present an overview of the recently published results of biomechanical and clinical studies on rotator cuff repair using single-and double-row techniques. Materials and methods. The review is based on a selective literature research of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database on the subject of the clinical and biomechanical results of single-and double-row repair. Results. In general, neither the biomechanical nor the clinical evidence can recommend the use of a double-row concept for the treatment for every rotator cuff tear. Only tears of more than 3 cm seem to benefit from better results on both imaging and in clinical outcome studies compared with the use of single-row techniques. Conclusions. Despite a significant increase in publications on the surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears in recent years, the clinical results were not significantly improved in the literature so far. Unique information and algorithms, from which the optimal treatment of this entity can be derived, are still inadequate. Because of the cost-effectiveness and the currently vague evidence, the double-row techniques cannot be generally recommended for the repair of all rotator cuff tears
Calcined Bursitis prepatellar: Casereport of a Female Patient with limited systemic Scleroderma and Literature Review
No full textVariations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Calcined Bursitis prepatellar: Casereport of a Female Patient with limited systemic Scleroderma and Literature Review
No full textAppropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
