618 research outputs found

    Kliemt, Hartmut

    No full text

    (Over)-stylizing experimental findings and theorizing with sweeping generality

    No full text
    Human decision making is a process guided by different and partly competing mo-tivations that can each dominate behavior and lead to different effects depending on strength and circumstances. Over-stylizing neglects such competing concerns and context-dependence, although it facilitates the emergence of elaborate general theories. We illustrate by examples from social dilemma experiments and inequality aversion theories that sweeping empirical claims should be avoided

    Evolutionary Norm Enforcement

    No full text
    Applying an indirect evolutionary approach with endogenous preference formation, we show that a legal system can induce players to reward trust even if material incentives dictate to exploit trust. By analyzing the crowding out or crowding in of trustworthiness implied by various verdict rules, we can assess how a court influences the share of kept promises of "truly" trustworthy players who evolutionarily evolved as trustworthy and of opportunistic players who are only trustworthy if inspired by material incentives.

    Charitable giving: The role of framing and information

    No full text
    We investigate how different levels of information influence the allocation decisions of donors who are entitled to freely distribute a fixed monetary endowment between themselves and a charitable organization in both giving and taking frames. Participants donate significantly higher amounts, when the decision is described as taking rather than giving. This framing effect becomes smaller if more information about the charity is provided.Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 202

    Standardisierung in der Medizin: Qualitätssicherung oder Rationierung?

    No full text
    Dietrich F, Imhoff M, Kliemt H, eds. Standardisierung in der Medizin: Qualitätssicherung oder Rationierung?. Stuttgart, New York: Schattauer; 2004
    corecore