1,720,958 research outputs found
Deep learning versus conventional learning in data streams with concept drifts
No full textIn many real-world applications, the characteristics of data collected by activity logs, sensors and mobile devices change over time. This behavior is known as concept drift. In complex environments, which produce high dimensional data streams, machine learning tasks become cumbersome, as models become outdated very quickly. In our study, we assess hundreds of combinations of data characteristics and methods on network traffic data. Specifically, we focus on seven conventional machine learning and deep learning methods and compare their generalization power in the presence of concept drift. Our results show that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) outperform conventional methods, even when compared to an idealized upper bound on their performance created in a piecewise manner by selecting the best method and its best configuration at each point in time, thus mimicking the output of a perfect meta-learning architecture. In the context of sequential data subject to concept drift, our results appear to defy the usually accepted 'No Free Lunch Theorem (NFL)', which stipulates that no method dominates all the others in every situation. While this is by no means a rejection of the NFL Theorem, which captures a much more complex phenomenon, it is nonetheless a surprising result worth further investigations. As a matter of fact, our results show that, when data availability is limited, a meta-learning approach is preferable to CNNs, as it requires less data for training
Spark-GHSOM: Growing Hierarchical Self-Organizing Map for large scale mixed attribute datasets
Full text linkThe Growing Hierarchical Self-Organizing Map (GHSOM) algorithm has shown its potential for performing several tasks such as exploratory analysis, anomaly detection and forecasting on a variety of domains including the financial and cyber-security domains. GHSOM is a dynamic variant of the SOM algorithm which generates a multi-level hierarchy of SOM maps based solely on input data. However, in order to generate this multi-level structure, GHSOM requires multiple iterations over the input dataset, thus making it intractable on large datasets. Moreover, the conventional GHSOM algorithm is designed to handle datasets with numeric attributes only. This represents an important limitation as most modern real-world datasets are characterized by mixed attributes - numerical and categorical. In this work, we propose an extension of the conventional GHSOM algorithm called Spark-GHSOM, which exploits the Spark platform to process massive datasets in a distributed manner. Moreover, we leverage a method known as the distance hierarchy approach to modify the optimization function of GHSOM so that it can (also) coherently handle mixed-attribute datasets. We test our new method with respect to accuracy, scalability and descriptive power. The results obtained using different datasets demonstrate the superior predictive and descriptive capabilities of Spark-GHSOM, as well as its applicability to large-scale datasets which could not be analyzed before
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
