1,721,469 research outputs found
Kerr, R J, 21529
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396965Surname: KERR. Given Name(s) or Initials: R J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 21529. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-1593.234071
Item: [2016.0049.29258] "Kerr, R J, 21529
Kerr, R C, NX5998
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396995Surname: KERR. Given Name(s) or Initials: R C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX5998. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 3942.234131
Item: [2016.0049.29288] "Kerr, R C, NX5998
Kerr, R, Singapore
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/397006Surname: KERR. Given Name(s) or Initials: R. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: SINGAPORE. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 19973.234153
Item: [2016.0049.29299] "Kerr, R, Singapore
Kerr, R A, 409144
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396978Surname: KERR. Given Name(s) or Initials: R A. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 409144. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 49414.234097
Item: [2016.0049.29271] "Kerr, R A, 409144
Identifying Factors for Student Success in Micronesian Populations
No full textThe purpose of this case study was to examine factors which influence Micronesian migrant students who successfully matriculate to schools in the U.S. territory of Guam. A heuristic, exploratory case study design was used to provide an overarching framework for the study. The study included both quantitative and qualitative data. Educator surveys were used to help inform educator interviews for the purpose of identifying common factors that lead to Micronesian migrant student success in the U.S. territory of Guam. From this analysis, culture, mindsets, English Language Learning strategies, resources, and family and community engagement emerged as the foundation of a framework for engaging Micronesian migrant students.|Keywords: English Language Learner, Family and Community Engagement, Indigenous Education, Micronesia, Migrant Student, Student Success.ProQuest Traditional Publishing Optio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Reconciliation After War: Historical Perspectives on Transitional Justice
Full text linkhis edited volume examines a range of historical and contemporary episodes of reconciliation and anti-reconciliation in the aftermath of war. Reconciliation is a concept that resists easy definition. At the same time, it is almost invariably invoked as a goal of post-conflict reconstruction, peacebuilding and transitional justice. This book examines the considerable ambiguity and controversy surrounding the term and, crucially, asks what has reconciliation entailed historically? What can we learn from past episodes of reconciliation and anti-reconciliation? Taken together, the chapters in this volume adopt an interdisciplinary approach, focused on the question of how reconciliation has been enacted, performed and understood in particular historical episodes, and how that might contribute to our understanding of the concept and its practice. Rather than seek a universal definition, this book focuses on what makes each case of reconciliation unique, and highlights the specificity of reconciliation in individual contexts.
This book will be of much interest to students of transitional justice, conflict resolution, human rights, history and International Relations.
Introduction: A Genealogy of Reconciliation?
The chapter introduces the edited volume, and sets out its core questions and premise. This is to offer a fresh take on what reconciliation means, and might mean, by looking to historical and forgotten instances of reconciliation, and particularly those which fall outside the usual scope of transitional justice and peacebuilding research. In particular, we argue, this draws attention to the specificity of reconciliation attempts, the important of a longue duree perspective, an emphasis on interdisciplinarity and finally can open up new and novel understandings of reconciliation in the face of what we argue remains a limited and constrained understanding of the term.
The core questions we asked the authors ere:What does the term 'reconciliation' mean during the events you have studied? How was it pursued? How did it unfold? Which particular harm was seen as needing to be redressed? Which were the key actors driving the process? Was it deemed successful? Why, or why not? On whose/what terms
- …
