1,724,568 research outputs found
Kent D. Martin
No full textKent D. Martin receives an award for 15 years of service in Student Affairs. (l-r) President William Perry, Kent D. Martin, Vice President of Student Affairs Dan Nadler.https://thekeep.eiu.edu/years_of_service_2013/1116/thumbnail.jp
Kent D. Martin
No full textKent D. Martin, 20 years of service, with President David Glassman and Lynette Drake, Interim Vice President for Student Affairshttps://thekeep.eiu.edu/years_of_service_2018/1044/thumbnail.jp
MF2183
Full text linkKent D. Rausch, Providing safe containers for food products: facts for niche-market food processors, Kansas State University, March 1996
Choosing and integrating new crops and products
No full textOlson, Kent D.. (1987). Choosing and integrating new crops and products. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202612
Expert Report of Kent D. Syverud
Full text linkExpert report from an educator with experience teaching many students in many settings; particular experience teaching the same subject matter to classes that are racially homogenous and racially heterogeneous, and to classes where non-white students make up a tiny fraction of the enrolled students and where their numbers are more significant
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
