1,721,027 research outputs found
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article
you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be
bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editor Kenneth V.
Iserson care of CQ. If you do not like the editorial comments,
this will give you an opportunity to respond in the letters section.
Your input is desired and anticipated.</jats:p
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article
you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be
bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editor Kenneth V.
Iserson care of CQ. If you do not like the editorial comments,
this will give you an opportunity to respond in the letters section.
Your input is desired and anticipated.</jats:p
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article
you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be
bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editor Kenneth V.
Iserson care of CQ. If you do not like the editorial comments,
this will give you an opportunity to respond in the letters section.
Your input is desired and anticipated.</jats:p
Advance Directives: The Physician's Role (1995)
No full textFrom the University of Arizona Health Sciences Center. Those appearing in the tape are Kenneth V. Iserson, M.D., M.B.A., and Angelica Gomez Messerschmidt
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editors Kenneth V. Iserson and Barry Morenz at [email protected].</jats:p
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editors Kenneth V. Iserson and Barry Morenz at [email protected].</jats:p
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editors Kenneth V. Iserson and Barry Morenz at [email protected].</jats:p
Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature
No full textThis section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editors Kenneth V. Iserson and Barry Morenz at [email protected].</jats:p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
