1,720,957 research outputs found
Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects
No full textObjectivesThe goal was to design a method which would permit an assessment of the suitability of a newly developed implant under physiological-like loading conditions. Information obtained from such an analysis is expected to delineate more clearly the indications for a new device prior to clinical utilization.DesignIn vitro mechanical stiffness testing and finite element analysis.MethodsFrom in vitro testing of proximal tibiae with defects, the stiffness of an internal stabilization system was determined. Using a finite element model, the loading of both the implant and bone was analyzed including all muscle forces. The variation in implant loading and interfragmentary strain for different defect locations was also investigated.ResultsConventional stiffness testing demonstrated the comparability of the experimental findings with the finite element predictions. Under physiological-like loading the implant experienced high bending and von Mises stresses if defects in the region of the shaft were stabilized. A short working length increased implant loading up to the yield strength of the material.ConclusionsThe finite element analysis illustrated the appropriateness of this new device for proximal defects of the tibia, but the implant should be used hesitantly in fractures or defects extending into the diaphyseal region of the bone.RelevanceThis new analytical approach helped to identify clinical indications for the implant in which its mechanical attributes would prove advantageous
Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing
No full textThe stability of joint endoprostheses depends on the loading conditions to which the implant-bone complex is exposed. Due to a lack of appropriate muscle force data, less complex loading conditions tend to be considered in vitro. The goal of this study was to develop a load profile that better simulates the in vivo loading conditions of a "typical" total hip replacement patient and considers the interdependence of muscle and joint forces. The development of the load profile was based on a computer model of the lower extremities that has been validated against in vivo data. This model was simplified by grouping functionally similar hip muscles. Muscle and joint contact forces were computed for an average data set of up to four patients throughout walking and stair climbing. The calculated hip contact forces were compared to the average of the in vivo measured forces. The final derived load profile included the forces of up to four muscles at the instances of maximum in vivo hip joint loading during both walking and stair climbing. The hip contact forces differed by less than 10% from the peak in vivo value for a "typical" patient. The derived load profile presented here is the first that is based on validated musculoskeletal analyses and seems achievable in an in vitro test set-up. It should therefore form the basis for further standardisation of pre-clinical testing by providing a more realistic approximation of physiological loading conditions
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
