1,720,981 research outputs found

    Evaluation of overstrength-based interaction checks for columns in steel moment frames

    No full text
    A study is presented to examine the implications of this guidance, which disregards the column interaction check (including both axial force and moment) under overstrength seismic loads. A set of thirteen steel moment frames are designed using multiple rules that apply and disregard overstrength, drift, and cross-sectional compactness checks in various combinations. The frames are subjected to a suite of simulations including linear elastic, nonlinear static pushover, nonlinear response history, and continuum finite element simulations that are able to represent a range of physical behavior modes in the columns including interactive nonlinear geometric instabilities that could trigger loss of the load carrying capacity of the member. The simulations indicate no significant distinction between the seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames designed as per current code-based provisions (i.e., disregarding the column interaction check for overstrength seismic loads), and those designed with the use of the interaction check, with each providing acceptable response without failure. The simulations also indicate that design checks for drift and cross-sectional compactness play a significant role ensuring acceptable response, providing additional margin of safety beyond the member strength checks.RESSLA

    Fracture Propagation Modeling in Civil Steel Structures at Different Length-Scales

    Get PDF
    Within the civil structural community, nonlinear time history analysis has become a ubiquitous tool to evaluate the structural performance of steel structures when subjected to extreme loadings such as earthquakes, blast, and strong winds. Extreme limit states such as structural instability, local bulking, plastic stress/strain localization in critical regions and structural components can be reliably simulated using current available analysis methods. However, the existing methods cannot reliably model fracture—an extreme limit state which may precipitate structural failure and collapse. Henceforth, on both the structural component and system level, researchers and engineers typically implement a capacity check evaluation approach in which a fracture toughness demand index, calculated based on the predicted continuum stress and strain fields, is checked against a material toughness parameter. Conservatively equating end-of-life (e.g., ultimate failure) to fracture initiation rather than to the onset of unstable crack propagation (e.g., cleavage), such approach disregards the remaining inherit capacity of the steel structure or components—as evident in recent large-scale experimental studies in which the steel components often sustained significant amount of stable ductile crack growth prior to ultimate failure. Clearly, a holistic framework or tool to reliably simulate crack propagation in concert with the global analysis of steel components enables a more realistic assessment of the structural performance of steel structures and designs because it captures the complex interactions between the overall structural response and advancing crack front. Depending on many factors such as the existing numerical tools and associated computational cost, nature of the crack propagation, and the size scale, some numerical frameworks may be more appropriate than others for modeling crack propagation in steel structures. Motivated by this, the scope of this project entails modeling crack propagation in steel structures on three different scales: continuum level, structural component level, and structural frame level. At the continuum level, a novel computational framework is developed and implemented to simulate ductile fracture initiation and propagation. This framework incorporates a local micromechanistic continuum damage model into a cohesive zone model; the continuum damage model predicts fracture initiation, whereas the cohesive zone model simulates the physical process of crack growth and propagation. The framework has been demonstrated to give reliable results (i.e., mesh-convergent agreement between test data and simulations using a single set of model parameters) using test data from CNT and CT specimens. At the structural component level, the framework successfully simulates crack propagation in test specimens that are meant to imitate practical structural design details such as the bolted connections and the reduced-beam-section (RBS) specimen under monotonic loading. Ideally, on the structural frame level, the established framework may be applied to model fracture propagations in key structural components throughout the frame. However, the high computational cost renders such approach impractical. Clearly, a phenomenological frame-element based model is more appropriate. Such model is developed to simulate post-fracture response of welded column splices. The novel model is informed by fracture-mechanics based estimates of splice strength and reproduces phenomena such as gapping and re-seating that occurs in the splices after fracture. Specifically, within the framework of Performance Based Earthquake Engineering, the effects of column splice fracture on the seismic performance of steel moment frames are assessed. It is concluded that due to the rocking phenomenon (e.g., rocking of the top stories above a story with fractured column splices), splice fractures auspiciously affect the dynamic response. Additionally, the phenomenology of splice fracturing throughout the structural system are investigated

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
    corecore