1,720,959 research outputs found
rOpenGov/iotables: 0.4.6 CRAN release
No full textFull Changelog: https://github.com/rOpenGov/iotables/compare/0.4.4...0.4.
rOpenGov/iotables: 0.9.1 CRAN release with documentation and bug fixes
No full textThis is a documenation update and a minor bug patch before the major release 1.0 with a long-form publication.
Please take a look at the iotables: an r Package for Reproducible Input-Output Economics Analysis, Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment with Empirical Data manuscript to describe in more detail for a journal submission the methodology and further development philosophy of iotables
Patent Applications in European Union
No full textThis dataset combines data from the following Eurostat sources:
High-tech patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 regions [PAT_EP_RTEC]:
Unit of measure: [NR] Number; [P_MHAB] Per million inhabitants
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 regions, international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes [PAT_EP_RIPC]:
International patent classification (IPC) [ipc]: [IPC] International patent classification (IPC) - total; [A] Section A - Human necessities; [B] Section B - Performing operations; transporting; [C] Section C - Chemistry; metallurgy; [D] Section D - Textiles; paper; [E] Section E - Fixed constructions; [F] Section F - Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons; blasting; [G] Section G - Physics; [H] Section H - Electricity
Unit of measure: [NR] Number; [P_MHAB] Per million inhabitant
European Green Deal R&D and Business Opportunities
No full textThis dataset combines data from the following Eurostat sources:
Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba): GBARD by socioeconomic objectives (NABS 2007) (gba_nabsfin07):
Nomenclature for the analysis and comparison of scientific programmes and budgets (NABS 2007) [nabs07]: [NABS02] Environment
Unit of measure: [EUR_HAB] Euro per inhabitant
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) at national and regional level (rd_e): GERD by sector of performance and socioeconomic objectives (NABS 2007) [RD_E_GERDSOBJ07]:
Nomenclature for the analysis and comparison of scientific programmes and budgets (NABS 2007) [nabs07]: [NABS02] Environment; [TOTAL] Total government budget allocations for R&D
Unit of measure: [EUR_HAB] Euro per inhabitant
Climate change: Mitigation: Production, value added and exports in the environmental goods and services sector (env_ac_egss2):
Classification of economic activities - NACE Rev.2 [nace_r2]: [TOTAL] Total - all NACE activities
Classification of environmental protection activities (CEPA) and classification of resource management activities (CReMA) [ceparema]: [TOTAL] Total environmental protection and resource management activities
Unit of measure [unit]: [PC_GDP] Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)
Type of expenditure [ty]: [TOT_EGSS] Total environmental goods and services secto
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
