1,720,979 research outputs found

    Perception of Complex Emotional Body Language of a Virtual Character

    No full text
    Virtual characters are a common phenomenon in serious game applications, and can enrich training environments for a range of different purposes. These characters can be used in games that have been developed to help people with learning difficulties. They can also be used to help users develop social skills, such as communication. For social interactions, much communicative information is contained in the body language between the parties involved. We know that humans are sensitive to emotions when they are conveyed on a virtual character and are capable of correctly identifying certain emotions. However, research on emotions and virtual characters tends to focus on a small number of emotions. We wish to create characters for a serious game who will convey a wide range of complex and subtle emotions. This paper presents a first investigation into the use of complex emotional body language for a virtual character. In two experiments, we examine participants’ perception of a range of motion-captured subtle emotions. Results from a pilot shows that participants are better able to recognise complex emotions with negative connotations rather than positive from a virtual character’s body motion. A second experiment aims to identify perceptual overlaps in these emotions, and results obtained motivate further investigation

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore