200,693 research outputs found
Promotie van H.A.E. Kramer
No full textH.A.E. Kramer met paranimfen E. Spier (r ) en Raden Mas Hidajat (l
Data supporting the comparison of golden-winged warbler and American woodcock productivity in northern Minnesota, USA
No full textSee ReadMe.txt for detailed description of files. Files include model-predicted productivity for both species (raster), digitized land-cover type classification of study area (shapefile), predicted productivity of both species at observed nesting sites, and R code to make the statistical comparisons and produce the graphs in Kramer et al. (2019).Spatially explicit predicted reproductive output for golden-winged warblers and American woodcock at Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota, USA used to compare reproductive output of woodcock and warblers in Kramer et al. (2019; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.039). Models developed by Peterson (2014: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167309),Peterson et al. (2016) rely on raw demographic data for golden-winged warblers collected and reported by Peterson (2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167309). Models developed by Kramer (2017; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/188784) and Kramer et al. (in press) use raw demographic data for American woodcock collected and reported by Daly (2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167288).Kramer, Gunnar R; Peterson, Sean M; Daly, Kyle O; Streby, Henry M; Andersen, David E. (2019). Data supporting the comparison of golden-winged warbler and American woodcock productivity in northern Minnesota, USA. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://doi.org/10.13020/znag-tn48
Samuel Noah Kramer: 10-06-1981
No full textSamuel Noah Kramer was a Sumerian history and language expert and the author of over 25 books and 150 articles on Sumer. He begins the interview by reading a piece of Sumerian literature and continues by discussing what Sumerian literature is about, the time period it was written in, and the types of literature that the Sumerians wrote. He discusses how he got into cuneiform, the system of writing developed by the Sumerians, and talks about coming to the United States as a child. Kramer concludes the interview by discussing how he became an archaeologist.Archived web contentSUNY BrockportWriters Forum Video
Samuel Noah Kramer: 10-06-1981
No full textSamuel Noah Kramer was a Sumerian history and language expert and the author of over 25 books and 150 articles on Sumer. He begins the interview by reading a piece of Sumerian literature and continues by discussing what Sumerian literature is about, the time period it was written in, and the types of literature that the Sumerians wrote. He discusses how he got into cuneiform, the system of writing developed by the Sumerians, and talks about coming to the United States as a child. Kramer concludes the interview by discussing how he became an archaeologist.https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/writers_videos/1020/thumbnail.jp
Trachynotus Kramer 1876
No full textTrachynotus Kramer, 1876 Trachynotus Kramer, 1876: 74. Type species Trachynotus pyriformis Kramer, 1876: 74, designated by Michael, 1894: 293. Notes. Trachynotus Kramer, 1876 is a junior homonym of Trachynotus Latreille, 1829 (Coleoptera), and was replaced by Trachytes Michael, 1894.Published as part of Halliday, R. B., 2015, Catalogue of genera and their type species in the mite Suborder Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 101-147 in Zootaxa 3972 (2) on page 130, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3972.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/23277
Dinychus Kramer 1886
No full textDinychus Kramer, 1886 Dinychus Kramer, 1886: 255. Type species Dinychus perforatus Kramer, 1886: 255, by original designation. Notes. The genus name has been incorrectly spelled as Dynichus by some authors. Some authors have stated that D. perforatus was described by Kramer (1882), but that appears to be an error.Published as part of Halliday, R. B., 2015, Catalogue of genera and their type species in the mite Suborder Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 101-147 in Zootaxa 3972 (2) on page 112, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3972.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/23277
Survey of Italian veterinary practioners on D. immitis and D. repens
No full textDirofilarial infections (D. immitis, D. repens) are vector-borne parasitic diseases mainly of dogs and cats. Moreover, they are zoonotic and endemic areas of both are expanding. The experience of veterinarians is very important for correct prevention and diagnosis. To evaluate this, an electronic questionnaire was sent to all Italian veterinary facilities. In the first months of 2018 a questionnaire was sent by e-mail to 2795 veterinary facilities (surgeries, clinics, hospitals and public facilities). The 31 questions were mainly about in which province the facilities were located, and about diagnosis, prevention and treatment for D. immitis and D. repens in dogs and cats. In addition, it was asked if they knew the Dirofilariosis societies and if they had attended lectures and/or congresses on the topic. Among 662 responses (27%), 33.7% facilities reported infections only of D. immitis, 3.2% only of D. repens, 10.7% mix infections and 52.4% no cases of either parasite in the last year. Dirofilaria
immitis infections were observed above all in the northern and central Italy. However, also many regions of the south and the islands (Sicily and Sardinia) reported heartworm infections. Dirofilaria repens is fairly evenly distributed throughout Italy mainly in co-infections with D. immitis. The most frequent diagnostic method used in dogs was the antigen test, 24.0%, followed by the fresh blood smear together with the antigen test 23.3%, aid of a diagnostic laboratory 8.3%, and Knott test together with the antigen test 4.7%. For D.
repens in dogs results were: diagnostic laboratory 33.8%, skin biopsy 10.8% and fresh blood smear 9.8%. The most frequently diagnostic technique for D. immitis in cats was: diagnostic laboratory 27.3%, serological test 26.9% and fresh blood smear 8.2%. For treatment of canine heartworm infection, more then 25% used ivermectin + doxycycline or melarsomin and ivermectin + doxycycline 11%; while more than 50% did not do any treatment in the cat. Prevention was started in the dog in April-May, 54.8%, while 10.3% treated for all year. Finally, more than 70% knew the American Heartworm Society (AHS),
while 69% knew the European Society of Dirofilariosis and Angiostrongylosis
(ESDA). Our data show how D. immitis and D. repens are distributed in most of the Italian provinces. Furthermore, the diagnosis is often underestimated and mainly relegated just to serology. This type of research can be a good starting point for scientific societies and to get updated risk maps
Uropodidae Kramer 1881
No full textUropodidae Kramer, 1881 <p>Uropodina Kramer, 1881: 641.</p> <p> Type genus <i>Uropoda</i> Latreille, 1806, by inference from the family name.</p> <p> <b>Notes.</b> Kramer (1881, page 641) referred to a taxon called Uropodina, which included the genera <i>Uropoda</i> de Geer and <i>Trachynotus</i> Kramer. On the following page he said that the Uropodina may be divided into two tribes, depending on the presence or absence of claws on leg I. This makes it clear that he was referring to Uropodina as a family-group taxon. He was mistaken about the authorship of the genus <i>Uropoda</i>.</p> <p>Various authors have referred to taxa with names such as " Uropodidae Berlese, 1892 ", " Uropodidae Berlese, 1900 ", " Uropodidae Berlese, 1910 ", "Uropodini Berlese, 1917 ", "Uropodoidea Evans, 1957 ", or "Uropodinae Hirschmann & Zirngiebl-Nicol, 1962 ", but none of these is correct. According to the Principle of Coordination (ICZN Article 36.1), the author of all these names is Kramer (1881).</p>Published as part of <i>Halliday, R. B., 2016, Catalogue of families and their type genera in the mite suborder Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 347-366 in Zootaxa 4061 (4)</i> on page 359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4061.4.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/259719">http://zenodo.org/record/259719</a>
Marcusenius altisambesi Kramer 2007
No full text<i>Marcusenius altisambesi</i> Kramer et al., 2007 <p>(Figure 4C, D)</p> <p> <i>Gnathonemus okavangensis</i> Pappenheim, 1907. “Appeared as a form of <i>Gnathonemus macrolepidotus</i> Peters from the Okavango R., Damaraland, Africa; regarded as infrasubspecific and not available” (Eschmeyer 2013). “Nomen dubium” according to Gosse (1984) and Seegers (1996, p. 73).</p> <p> <i>Gnathonemus macrolepidotus</i>: Gilchrist and Thompson 1913, pp. 330–331.</p> <p> <i>Marcusenius altisambesi</i> Kramer et al. (2007), pp. 681–684.</p> <i>Type specimens</i> <p>Holotype: SAIAB 79135 (specimen L39isi), Namibia: Caprivi Strip: Lisikili on Upper Zambezi River. Paratypes: SAIAB 79136 (6), SAIAB 79137 (3), ZSM 35086 (5), ZSM 35085 (2), ZSM 35097 (1), ZSM 35082 (2); all examined.</p> <p> <b>–</b> Non-types, examined. One hundred and four specimens from the Upper Zambezi River System, East Caprivi, Namibia, some specimens from Kalimbeza presently alive in Aquarium:</p> <p> <b>–</b> SMF 28264 (22 specimens), from the Zambezi River, Lisikili backwater, 17 ◦ 33 ′ S, 24 ◦ 29 ′ E (type locality), coll.: F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, 5–7 March 1994,</p> <p> <b>–</b> SMF 28264 (45 specimens), ZSM 35084 (1), from the Kwando River, Nakatwa, 18 ◦ 06 ′ S, 23 ◦ 23 ′ E, in Mudumu National Park, coll.: B. Kramer, 9–15 March 1994, locality 6 on Figure 1,</p> <p> <b>–</b> SMF 28264 (two specimens), from Kwando River, Nkasa Island (18 ◦ 27 ′ S, 23 ◦ 42 ′ E) in Mamili National Park, close to locality 6 on Figure 1, coll.: F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, 9–10 September 1993,</p> <p> <b>–</b> 31 specimens, about 500 m from opposite Kalimbeza fishing camp, at downstream tip of small island between Lisikili side channel and main channel, coll.: F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, caught 21 August 1999, water conductivity and temperature, 84 µS cm, 22 ◦ C, size range 7.2–13.3 cm SL, arrival live in Regensburg 2 September 1999, EOD recording 28 September to 7 October 1999 at 100 µS cm−1 water conductivity and 21 ◦ C (EOD recording in Germany for quicker transport in Africa), presently alive,</p> <p> −1</p> <p> <b>–</b> ZSM 35083 (1), from Kwando River, Kongola Bridge, 17 ◦ 47 ′ 26.7 ′′ S, 23 ◦ 20 ′ 40.0 ′′ E, 24 January 2001, coll.: F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer,</p> <p> <b>–</b> Non-types (63 specimens)from the Okavango River, Botswana, totalling at least 10 males, male size range 110–181 mm SL, juvenile/female size range 54–169 mm SL, examined:</p> <p> <b>–</b> SAIAB 79140 (9), ZSM 35079 (1), ZSM 35080 (3), ZSM 35081 (6) from the Okavango River, Makwena Lodge, near the township of Etsha no. 6, 19 ◦ 07 ′ 30 ′′ S, 22 ◦ 22 ′ E, coll.: F.H. van der Bank, J. Engelbrecht and B. Kramer, 20–22 January 2001, locality 7 on Figure 1,</p> <p> <b>–</b> SAIAB 79143 (6), ZSM 35096 (5), and 24 specimens presently alive in aquarium, from the Okavango River at Guma Lagoon, 18 ◦ 57 ′ 46.6 ′′ S, 22 ◦ 22 ′ 25.3 ′′ E, coll.: F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, 10–12 August 2004, close to locality 7 on Figure 1,</p> <p> <b>–</b> SAIAB 79141 (1), ZSM 35095 (1), and seven specimens presently alive in aquarium, details as in preceding paragraph, except for locality at Makwena, 19 ◦ 03 ′ 13.85 ′′ S, 22 ◦ 22 ′ 42.6 ′′ E, 12 August 2004.</p> <p> <i>Samples examined for genetics.</i> DNA samples are stored at Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg University (IPMB).</p> <p> <b>–</b> IPMB 44903–44905, Namibia: Upper Zambezi: Kalimbeza, 17 ◦ 32 ′ 27.3 ′′ S, 24 ◦ 31 ′ 26.2 ′′ E, coll. F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, 21 August 1999;</p> <p> <b>–</b> IPMB 44638–44640 Botswana: Okavango: Guma Lagoon, 18 ◦ 57 ′ 46.6 ′′ S, 22 ◦ 22 ′ 25.3 ′′ E, coll. F.H. van der Bank and B. Kramer, 10 August 2004; IPMB 44641, 44642, as before, but 10–12 August 2004; GenBank accession numbers: (KC 202230 – KC 202237).</p> <i>Type locality</i> <p> Upper Zambezi River in East Caprivi (Namibia); specifically Upper Zambezi River between Lisikili and Kalimbeza (or Kalambesa, 17 ◦ 33 ′ S, 24 ◦ 29 ′ E to 17 ◦ 32 ′ 27.3 ′′ S, 24 ◦ 31 ′ 26.2 ′′ E; 22–26 km straight line downstream from Katima Mulilo; Figure 1, no. 5).</p> <p> The first record of <i>G. macrolepidotus</i> for the Upper Zambezi is that of Gilchrist and Thompson (1917, p. 562), specifying Lialui, Barotseland as origin. For a description, the authors refer to Gilchrist and Thompson (1913, p. 330), a description of South African specimens that Kramer et al. (2007) have referred to <i>M. pongolensis</i> (Fowler, 1934). The presence of <i>G. macrolepidotus</i> in the Upper Zambezi System was confirmed by Jubb (1958). Another possible synonym would be <i>G. okavangensis</i> if it were available (this name should be dropped from a list of synonyms, as suggested by Kramer et al. 2007). Upper Zambezi and Okavango specimens were recognized as representing a new species, <i>M. altisambesi</i>, that is well differentiated from <i>M. macrolepidotus</i> (Peters, 1852) by Kramer et al. (2007).</p>Published as part of <i>Kramer, Bernd & Wink, Michael, 2013, East-west differentiation in the Marcusenius macrolepidotus species complex in Southern Africa: the description of a new species for the lower Cunene River, Namibia (Teleostei: Mormyridae), pp. 2327-2362 in Journal of Natural History (J. Nat. Hist.) (J. Nat. Hist.) 47 (35 - 36)</i> on pages 2335-2337, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2013.798699, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5197590">http://zenodo.org/record/5197590</a>
Special cases of the orbifold version of Zvonkine's r-ELSV formula
No full textWe prove the orbifold version of Zvonkine's r-ELSV formula in two special cases: the case of r=2 (complete 3-cycles) for any genus g≥0 and the case of any r≥1 for genus g=
- …
