1,720,954 research outputs found
La reforma del Código Civil y el art. 931
No full textO artigo analisa as alterações propostas ao art. 931 do Código Civil no contexto da reforma legislativa, focando na substituição da responsabilidade do empresário pela do fabricante e na introdução do conceito de "defeito" como requisito para a responsabilidade objetiva, aproximando o regime do Código Civil ao do Código de Defesa do Consumidor.
Recebido em: Julho de 2024 | Aceito em: Outubro de 2024This article analyzes the proposed amendments to art. 931 of the Civil Code within the context of legislative reform, focusing on the substitution of business owner liability for manufacturer liability and the introduction of the concept of "defect" as a requirement for strict liability, aligning the Civil Code regime with the Consumer Defense Code.
Received in: July 2024 | Accepted in: October 2024El artículo analiza las modificaciones propuestas al art. 931 del Código Civil en el contexto de la reforma legislativa, centrándose en la sustitución de la responsabilidad del empresario por la del fabricante y en la introducción del concepto de "defecto" como requisito para la responsabilidad objetiva, aproximando el régimen del Código Civil al del Código de Defensa del Consumidor.
Recibido en: Julio de 2024 | Aceptado en: Octubre de 202
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Os regimes de responsabilização civil no novo Marco Legal para Inteligência Artificial: o Projeto de Lei nº 2.338/23 : The civil liability regimes in the new Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence: Bill No. 2,338/23
No full textThis paper examines proposals for regulating liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence (AI) systems in Brazil, spanning across bill no. 21/2020 and focusing on the new text of the AI Legal Framework, bill no. 2,338/2023. The aim is to contribute to the legislative debate with a textual and critical analysis of the liability regimes outlined by bill no. 2,338/2023 and to anticipate issues and challenges to be faced by agents in the development and operation chain, as well as victims of AI systems. Additionally, it identifies stances that should be adopted by AI system agents and competent authorities for the balanced functioning of the liability system proposed in bill no. 2,338/2023.Este artigo examina propostas de regulação da responsabilidade civil por danos causados por sistemas de inteligência artificial (IA) no Brasil, perpassando o projeto de lei n.º 21/2020 e tendo como foco o novo texto de Marco Legal da IA, o PL n.º 2.338/2023. Objetiva-se contribuir para o debate legislativo com uma análise textual e crítica dos regimes de responsabilização delineados pelo PL n.º 2.338/2023 e a antecipação de questões e dificuldades a serem enfrentadas pelos agentes da cadeia de desenvolvimento e operação e vítimas de sistemas de IA. Além disso, identificam-se posturas que deverão ser adotadas pelos agentes de sistema de IA e autoridades competentes para o funcionamento equilibrado do sistema de responsabilidade proposto no PL n. 2.338/2023
- …
