1,721,096 research outputs found

    3 da Zhu jia zhuang

    No full text
    延安平劇硏究院集體創作.Music in number notation.Yan'an Ping ju yan jiu yuan ji ti chuang zuo

    Shui hu zhuan

    No full text
    延安平劇硏究會集體編寫.附: 從《逼上梁山》的出版談到平劇改造問題 / 劉芝明.Yan'an Ping ju yan jiu hui ji ti bian xie.Fu: Cong "Bi shang Liangshan" de chu ban tan dao Ping ju gai zao wen ti / Liu Zhiming

    Yi sheng xi ju yan jiu she: shou ci gong yan ji nian te kan.

    No full text
    [編輯者蔡澄玄, 梅逢春].書名據封面."演出地址: 香港大會堂音樂廳 ; 演出日期: 一九六四年十一月十五日 ; 演出時間: 下午八時正開演"[bian ji zhe Cai Chengxuan, Mei Fengchun].Shu ming ju feng mian."Yan chu di zhi: Xianggang da hui tang yin yue ting ; yan chu ri qi: yi jiu liu si nian shi yi yue shi wu ri ; yan chu shi jian: xia wu ba shi zheng kai yan

    Zhujiang lei: xin Yue ju.

    No full text
    陳殘雲原著 ; 華南文聯粤劇硏究組改編.本電子書乃根據《香港版權條例(第528章)》而複製, 並只可在大學圖書館系統內的獨立電子書系統上使用.Chen Canyun yuan zhu ; Huanan wen lian yue ju yan jiu zu gai bian.Ben dian zi shu nai gen ju "Xianggang ban quan tiao li (Di 528 zhang)" er fu zhi, bing zhi ke zai da xue tu shu guan xi tong nei de du li dian zi shu xi tong shang shi yong

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore