1,720,958 research outputs found
Genin (Vincent). Le laboratoire belge du droit international. Une communauté épistémique et internationale de juristes (1869-1914). Bruxelles, Académie royale de Belgique, 2018
No full textJottrand Maxime. Genin (Vincent). Le laboratoire belge du droit international. Une communauté épistémique et internationale de juristes (1869-1914). Bruxelles, Académie royale de Belgique, 2018. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 97, fasc. 4, 2019. Histoire – Geschiedenis. pp. 1452-1456
La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France de Godefroid Kurth (1847-1916). Historiographie de l’origine d’une controverse
No full textLa frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France of Godefroid Kurth (1847-1916). Historiography of the Origin of a Controversy.
Since the publication of La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France (1896-1898), the Belgian study of the historical origin of the demarcation between Germanic and Romance people cannot be written without referring to this fundamental work. The author, Godefroid Kurth contributed in shaping a historical object in regards to its methodological, chronological and topographical aspects. This work takes place in a national as well as European continuum. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the definition of a national identity is conceived according to criteria considered as scientific. In this configuration, the linguistic and racial elements were strongly mobilized. Our ambition with this paper is to go back to the redaction context of Kurth’s book, and thereby understand the sources of the historical but also topographical issue of the Linguistic Frontier in Belgium.Depuis la parution de La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France (1896-1898), l’étude belge de l’origine historique de la démarcation entre des peuples germaniques et romans ne s’écrit pas sans se référer à cet ouvrage pionnier. L’auteur, Godefroid Kurth, a ainsi contribué à structurer un objet historique aux points de vue méthodologique, chronologique et topographique. Ce travail s’inscrit cependant dans un continuum à la fois national et européen. Durant la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle, la définition d’une identité nationale se conçoit selon des critères jugés scientifiques. Dans ce modèle, les éléments linguistiques et raciaux sont alors intensément mobilisés. Notre objectif dans cette contribution est de revenir sur le contexte rédactionnel de l’ouvrage de Kurth et d’élucider, par ce fait, les sources du questionnement historique mais aussi topographique de la frontière linguistique en Belgique.La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France van Godefroid Kurth (1847-1916). Geschiedschrijving van de oorsprong van een controverse.
Sinds het uitkomen van La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France (1896-1898), kan de Belgische studie over de historische oorsprong van de begrenzing tussen Germaanse en Romaanse volkeren niet geschreven worden zonder verwijzing naar dit pionierswerk. De auteur, Godefroid Kurth, steunde zijn bijdrage op het structureren van een historisch probleem volgens methodologische, chronologische en topografische beschouwingen. Dit werk slaat zowel op nationaal als op Europees vlak. In de tweede helft van de negentiende eeuw geschiedt de definitie van een nationale identiteit volgens criteria die wetenschappelijk geacht worden. In deze aanpak staan taalkundige en rassencriteria centraal. Met dit artikel beogen wij een terugblik op de context van de redactie van Kurths boek, om, aldus, de oerbron van de historische en topografische vragen rond de taalgrens in België te begrijpen.Jottrand Maxime. La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le Nord de la France de Godefroid Kurth (1847-1916). Historiographie de l’origine d’une controverse. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 95, fasc. 2, 2017. Histoire Médiévale, Moderne et Contemporaine – Middleleeuwse, Moderne en Hedendaagse Geschiedenis. pp. 369-399
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
