1,720,993 research outputs found
FIG. 3 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 3. — Continuation.Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 32, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 1 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 1. — Continuation.Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 28, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 2 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 2. — Continuation.Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 30, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 2 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 2. — Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis of sequences of Pezizomycotina including Dactylospora based on ITS, LSU, SSU, TEF, RPB1 and RPB2 sequence data. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 60% and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities ≥ 0.90 are given above the nodes. Strain/culture numbers are given after the taxon names. The tree was rooted with Taphrina antarctica (CCFEE 5198) and Taphrina deformans (AFTOL ID 1234).Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 29, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 3 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 3. — Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis of sequences of Eurotiomycetes including Dactylospora based on ITS and LSU sequence data. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 60% and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities ≥ 0.90 are given above the nodes. Strain/culture numbers are given after the taxon names. The newly generated sequences are in blue bold. The tree was rooted with Teloschistes flavicans (Sw.) Norman Tflav103.Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 31, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 5 in A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae
FIG. 5. — Morphology of Dactylospora fusiformis Ekanayaka, E.B.G. Jones, Q. Zhao & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov. (Holotype MFLU 16-0593): A, substrate; B, ascomata on wood; C, ascoma on wood; D, cross section of an ascoma;E, close up of a vertical section of the ascoma at margin;F, apically swallen paraphyses;G, asci with gelatinous amyloid cap (in Melzer's reagent); H-J, short sessile asci; K-P, ellipsoid to fusoid ascospores. Scale bars: B, C, 1000 µm; D, 400 µm; E, 200 µm; F, 30 µm; G, J, 20 µm; K-N, 10 µm.Published as part of Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 35, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781485
FIG. 2 in Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde, gen. nov.
FIG. 2. — Continuation.Published as part of Dayarathne, Monika C., Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N., Devadatha, B., Abeywickrama, Pranami, G, E. B., Jones, areth, Chomnunti, Putarak, Sarma, V. V., Hyde, Kevin D., Lumyong, Saisamorn, C., Eric H. & Mckenzie, 2020, Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde, gen. nov., pp. 21-67 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3) on page 32, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2020v41a3, http://zenodo.org/record/781504
Dactylosporaceae Bellem. & Hafellner
Family DACTYLOSPORACEAE Bellem. & Hafellner <p> <i>In</i> Cryptog. Mycol. 3: 79 (1982).</p> <p>FACESOFFUNGI NUMBER. — FoF 04852</p> <p> GENERA INCLUDED. — <i>Dactylospor</i> a, possibly also <i>Sclerococcum</i></p> DESCRIPTION <p> Dactylosporaceae taxa are saprotrophic on bark and wood, liverworts or lichenicolous. This family includes two genera: <i>Dactylospora</i> and <i>Sclerococcum</i>. <i>Dactylospora</i> is a sexual genus and characterized by superficial to stalked blackish apothecia, excipulum composed of <i>textura angularis</i> to <i>globulosa</i> cells, hymenium consists of a thick gelatinous matrix, sparingly branched paraphyses apices slightly swollen and pigmented, cylindrical to clavate amyloid asci with I– tholus covered by an I+ blue external gelatinous cap, subglobose to ellipsoid and one to several transverse septate ascospores, mostly 8 per ascus (Hafellner 1979, Bellemère & Hafellner 1982; Döbbeler & Buck 2017). <i>Sclerococcum</i> is an asexual genus and characterized by sporodochial conidiomata (Diederich <i>et al.</i> 2013, Miadlikowska <i>et al.</i> 2014). In this paper, we introduce two new species of <i>Dactylospora</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Ekanayaka, Anusha H., G, E. B., Jones, areth, Hyde, Kevin D. & Zhao, Qi, 2019, A stable phylogeny for Dactylosporaceae, pp. 23-44 in Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3)</i> on page 25, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2019v40a3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7814853">http://zenodo.org/record/7814853</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
