546 research outputs found
Preface
No full textThe University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) is an occasional series published by the Penn Linguistics Club. The series has included volumes of previously unpublished work, or work in progress, by linguists with an ongoing affiliation with the Department, as well as volumes of papers from NWAV and the Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
This volume contains selected papers from NWAV 36, held from October 11–14, 2007 in Philadelphia, PA at the University of Pennsylvania.
Alphabetic thanks go to Stefanie Brody, Toni Cook, Aaron Dinkin, Keelan Evanini, Michael Friesner, Laurel MacKenzie, Maya Ravindranath, and Joshua Tauberer for help in editing.
Beginning with this volume, PWPL is now an internet-only publication. Since Vol. 13.2, PWPL has been published both in print and online gratis via ScholarlyCommons@Penn. Due to the large number of hits these online papers have received, and the time and expense of managing a back catalog of PWPL volumes, the editorial committee decided to cease print publication in favor of wider-scale free online dissemination. Please continue citing PWPL papers or issues as you would a print journal article, though you may also provide the URL of the manuscript. An example is below: Gerard Van Herk. 2008. Fear of a Black Phonology: The Northern Cities Shift as Linguistic White Flight. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14.2: Papers from NWAV 36, ed. K. Gorman, 157-161. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss2/19/ Ultimately, the entire back catalog will be digitized and available on ScholarlyCommons@Penn.
Publication in the University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) does not preclude submission of papers elsewhere; copyright is retained by the author(s) of individual papers.
The PWPL editors can be contacted at: U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 619 Williams Hall, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104–6305 [email protected] http://ling.upenn.edu/papers/pwpl.html Kyle Gorman Issue Edito
Preface
No full textThe University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) is an occasional series published by the Penn Linguistics Club. The series has included volumes of previously unpublished work, or work in progress, by linguists with an ongoing affiliation with the Department, as well as volumes of papers from NWAV and the Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
This volume contains selected papers from NWAV 36, held from October 11–14, 2007 in Philadelphia, PA at the University of Pennsylvania.
Alphabetic thanks go to Stefanie Brody, Toni Cook, Aaron Dinkin, Keelan Evanini, Michael Friesner, Laurel MacKenzie, Maya Ravindranath, and Joshua Tauberer for help in editing.
Beginning with this volume, PWPL is now an internet-only publication. Since Vol. 13.2, PWPL has been published both in print and online gratis via ScholarlyCommons@Penn. Due to the large number of hits these online papers have received, and the time and expense of managing a back catalog of PWPL volumes, the editorial committee decided to cease print publication in favor of wider-scale free online dissemination. Please continue citing PWPL papers or issues as you would a print journal article, though you may also provide the URL of the manuscript. An example is below: Gerard Van Herk. 2008. Fear of a Black Phonology: The Northern Cities Shift as Linguistic White Flight. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14.2: Papers from NWAV 36, ed. K. Gorman, 157-161. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss2/19/ Ultimately, the entire back catalog will be digitized and available on ScholarlyCommons@Penn.
Publication in the University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) does not preclude submission of papers elsewhere; copyright is retained by the author(s) of individual papers.
The PWPL editors can be contacted at: U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 619 Williams Hall, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104–6305 [email protected] http://ling.upenn.edu/papers/pwpl.html Kyle Gorman Issue Edito
Generational Differences Among Police Officers
No full textMany studies have examined differences in personality, values, and work ethics, between people from different generations. However, one of the biggest deficits in the generational differences knowledge is that little, if any, research has been done regarding generational differences in criminal justice. The purpose of this project was empirically to determine whether generational differences actually exist in policing organizations. Physical surveys examining generational differences were given to active duty police officers who are members of both Generation X and Generation Y. The officers were selected from the San Marcos, Kyle, Buda, and New Braunfels police departments. Using the survey originally developed by Gursoy, Geng-Qing Chi, and Karadag (2013), the study examined seven factors such as work centrality and leadership to determine whether generational differences exist among police officers. The results suggest that, while generational differences do exist among police officers, the strength of these differences appears to be weak, especially compared to findings in previous research. Technology challenge was the only factor that appeared to have a modest relationship with generation. Based on the findings from this study, changes to training for officers and management practices can better address these generational differences to make the workplace a more positive environment.Criminal Justice and Criminolog
Recommended from our members
A long quavering chant : peonage labor camps in the rural-industrial South, 1905-1965
Get PDFThis dissertation is a study of social and environmental conditions inside rural industrial labor camps throughout the U.S. South between 1905 and 1965. The use of peonage labor, i.e., the coercion of labor against ones’ will through indebtedness or violence impacted nearly a fourth of rural workers in the postbellum south, particularly in isolated railroad construction sites, lumber operations, turpentine camps, and commercial vegetable farms. Though employers’ various peonage labor regimes changed within the context of the camps’ physical environment and evolved over time, they continually took advantage of marginalized social groups, immigrants, African-Americans, and the poor. The relative inability of workers, their families, and reformers to prosecute employers and foremen for labor abuses stemmed from the collusion of local law enforcement and the indifference of federal government officials. Ultimately, broader market forces of globalization and technology changed peonage labor regimes, not the enforcement of federal statues outlawing the practice.Histor
Influx, 1999, volume 14, issue 4:
Get PDFAssistant editor: Tara DeLong. Contributors: Aaron Carpenter, Abe Murley, Alexander Duff, Ami Joseph, Anchin Chu, Andrea Renaud, Ben Bogart, Bernadette Wycks, Bronwyn Chambers, Ceasar Banares, Chris Jones, Christian Kuras, Christy Costello, Cristina King, Damian Hess, Damian Petryshyn, Dawn Buie, Derek Brunen, Frank Pang, Geneviève Clouthier, Harald Gravelsins, Heather Olsen, Igor Santizo, Janet Noade, Jaleen Grove, Karim Zouak, Kyle McGreer Thorpe, Leslie Grant, Lionel Doe, Little Jimi Crowbar, Lore, Lori Kiessling, Melanie Janisse, Mia Thomsett, Michael Black, Michael Lee, Micheal Simons, Paola Van Turennout, Peter Chelbak, Rachel Moore, Renen Costa Lima, Ryan Semeniak, Sean Clancy, Serena McCarroll, Suez Holland, T.J. Anzai, Tara DeLong, Theresa Magee, Thirza Jean Cuthand, Wade Germain, Wendy Hainstock, Xero, Yuka Kawada.
Personal non-commercial use of this item is permitted
Differentiating and Investigating Acute and Chronic Typologies of Suicidal Patients Using Quantitative and Qualitative Suicide Status Form (SSF) Responses
No full textDegree awarded: Ph.D. Psychology. The Catholic University of AmericaThis dissertation can be viewed by CUA users only.The Suicide Status Form (SSF) was developed by Jobes and colleagues (1997) to provide a standardized, clinically useful multipurpose assessment, treatment, and tracking clinical tool for suicidal patients. Research conducted using the SSF to date has pursued a larger effort within suicidology to study and potentially identify specific typologies of suicidal patents (e.g., chronic vs. acute), who may have uniquely different clinical presentations and responses to treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of the two quantitatively derived factor loadings of the "Core SSF Assessment" recently identified by Conrad et al (2009) that differentiated chronic (Factor 1) and acute (Factor 2) styles of responding to the SSF. Following this work, the current study attempted to explore the phenomenological differences between these two different suicidal presentations using qualitative data from three sections from the SSF: (a) the Core SSF Assessment, (b) the qualitative "Reasons for Living vs. Reasons for Dying Assessment," and (c) the qualitative "One Thing" Assessment. In this study, two experts in clinical suicidology classified 97 suicidal inpatients as chronically or acutely suicidal based on demographic, diagnostic, and suicidal attempt history data. This expert sort yielded n=39 individuals classified as chronically suicidal, with n=58 classified as acutely suicidal. Based on this sort, logistic regression analyses were performed using the quantitative rating responses from the Core SSF Assessment to determine if the previously identified two factors from Conrad et al (2009) study were indeed significant predictors of expert rated chronic vs. acute suicidality, respectively. High SSF rating scores on the empirically derived Factor 1 loading were found to significantly predict the expert sorted chronic cases; however SSF rating scores pertaining to the Factor 2 loading did not predict expert sorted acute cases. Additional chi-square statistics demonstrated that interpersonal concerns appeared to be particularly meaningful for both chronically and acutely suicidal individuals, and were observed to contribute to both suicidal states and life-sustaining beliefs. These seemingly contradictory findings raise a paradox for the suicidal individual, where the very relationships that can give an individual reason to live, can also seem to motivate a person towards suicide.Submitted by Shanyun Zhang ([email protected]) on 2013-05-09T17:02:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Grohmann.pdf: 373002 bytes, checksum: 2db6680e049eaedfe5d1afd947e03827 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2013-05-09T17:14:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Grohmann.pdf: 373002 bytes, checksum: 2db6680e049eaedfe5d1afd947e03827 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-01-0
The Impact of Mask Mandates on the Trade-Off Between GDP and COVID-19 Mortality
No full textWe extend the Hall, Jones, and Klenow (2020) utilitarian model to find the maximum reduction in gross domestic product (GDP) that a representative agent would be willing to accept in the current period to avoid all deaths associated with COVID-19. We discover that the answer changes with the adoption and compliance of universal mask mandates in the United States (US). In the absence of a mask mandate, we determine that the representative agent would be willing to reduce GDP by 30% (approximately 4.0 trillion USD). This represents a $1.7 (USD) trillion improvement in the agent’s willingness to trade-off GDP and COVID-19 deaths, attributed to how mask mandates reduce the death rate faced by a representative agent. We also empirically analyze the trade-off between GDP and COVID-19 deaths, finding that the trade-off does not exist in the combined Q1 and Q2 2020 data. However, we discover that the trade-off does exist in Q3 unemployment data, that differential lockdowns influence macroeconomic variables, and that mask mandates can significantly reduce COVID-19 deaths
Class of 2011, Indiana University Maurer School of Law
No full textPictured: Aaron Aft, Felipe Alexandre, Brandon Almas, Nanafrema Ananeh-Firempong, Jonathan Armiger, Caridad Austin, Jessica Baumi, Whitney Beck, Jessica Bergman, Martine Bernard, Rebecca Billick, Michelle Bird, Kyle Borkenhagen, Brielle Bovee, Amanda Brewster, Chenese Brown, Gregory Buhl, Jamie Burnett, Sarah Caldwell, Kristen Cameron, Thomas Cameron, Michael Carlston, Shaina Carmichael, Kyle Cassidy, Richard Chasney, Christina Clark, Kelli Colbert, Katelyn Conroy, Aileen Cook, Thomas Cook, Sean Crotty, Joseph Dages, Matthew Day, Allison Diercks, Lauren Dimmitt, Katie Dittelberger, Jalil Dozier, Amanda Elizondo, Jennifer Ellis, Katherine Erbeznik, Jessica Farley, Kathryne Feary, Greg Fick, Alison Finkelmeier, Margaret Flores, Timothy Flowers, Elizabeth Fox, John Frenk, Kimberly Furrer, Evelyn Gentry, Nathan George, John Georgievski,Sean Giambattista, Lisa Gibson, Amanda Glowacki,Kevin Grande, Kendal Gulbrandsen, Chip Habegger, Jana Hageman, Shane Hageman, Stephen Harper, Alec Hass, Jason Henderson, Kathryn Hiddle, Christopher Edwin Hopkins-Gillispie, Benjamin Hugon, Jesse James, Julie Jansen, Matthew Jenner, Amy Jensen, Kara Jensen, Daniel Johns, Lydia Johns, Jacob Johnson, Benjamin Jones, Randall Jones, Joseph Kassab, Caitlin Kerr, David Kim, Larissa Koshatka, Katherine LaBeau, Kurt Laird, Adebola Lamikanra, Krystal Lechner, Xinran Li, Winston Lin, Lance Lindeen, Brian Lohnes, Jonathan Long, Jesse Lothamer, Lacee Louderback, Austin Lumbard, Mehek Manawalia, Anthony Marek, Andrei Marks, Erin McAdams, Alison McCormick, Colin McCready, Jonathan McPike, Misty Mercer, Jessica Meredith, Ashley Michael, Jason Mizzell, Yoni Moise, Michael Morris, Megal Mullett, Christopher Nevels, Ryan Nicholson, Christopher Nusbaum, David Oberly, Ann O\u27Connor, Kevin O\u27Neill, Benjamin Parmet, Andrew Pendexter, Ryann Perlinski, Katherine Peterson, Matthew Petra, Andrew Pittman, Alexander Platte, Jonathan Postema, Gregory Pottorff, Amy Price, Zachary Raibley, Timothy Renfro, Joshua Robare, Justin Roddye, David Rosenberg, Sarah Ruhlen, Samantha Salisbury, Alicia Sanders, Melissa Sauer, Ashley Schneider, David Schwarz, Jesal Shah, Megan Shipley, Catherine Siebecker, Alexander Simpson, Conor Slocum, Deirdre Lynch Smith, Jessica Smith, Patrick Smith, Jessica Sosa, Aaron Spolarich, Elizabeth Steele, Abbey Stamler, Christopher Stoker, Gregory Sturm, Andrew Tan, Michelle Tanyhill, Macey Thompson, Gregory Touney, Christopher Lloyd Tucker, Gina Venturelli, Jason Wallace, Zhuhao Wang, Allison Weimer, Rachel Wetzel, Alanna Whybrew, Luke Williams, Seth Williams, Therese Williams, Ingrid Winston, Sarah Yusuf, Jing Zhang, and Christine Zook.
Not pictured:
Amir Raza Ali, Jacob Atz, Elizabeth Ann Baldwin,Jeffrey Block, Syed Bokhari, Jessica Boyd, Daniel Bradley, Allison Cardinal, Robert Clark, Noah Ellenberg, Lori Anne Johnston, Kiersten Ann Kamman, Jessica Ann Kruse, Douglas Line, Rodan Luo, Lauren Outlaw, Jonathan Powers, Leslie Prill, Noah Priluck, Joshua Radicke, Hudson Thomas Rowland, Matthew Ruher, Stephen Schwartz, Renee Skeeta, Mia So, Abbey Rae Stemler, Andrew Williams, and Noah Williams.
The Recognition Ceremony Program for the Class of 2011 can be found here.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/composite/1035/thumbnail.jp
Class of 2011, Indiana University Maurer School of Law
No full textPictured: Aaron Aft, Felipe Alexandre, Brandon Almas, Nanafrema Ananeh-Firempong, Jonathan Armiger, Caridad Austin, Jessica Baumi, Whitney Beck, Jessica Bergman, Martine Bernard, Rebecca Billick, Michelle Bird, Kyle Borkenhagen, Brielle Bovee, Amanda Brewster, Chenese Brown, Gregory Buhl, Jamie Burnett, Sarah Caldwell, Kristen Cameron, Thomas Cameron, Michael Carlston, Shaina Carmichael, Kyle Cassidy, Richard Chasney, Christina Clark, Kelli Colbert, Katelyn Conroy, Aileen Cook, Thomas Cook, Sean Crotty, Joseph Dages, Matthew Day, Allison Diercks, Lauren Dimmitt, Katie Dittelberger, Jalil Dozier, Amanda Elizondo, Jennifer Ellis, Katherine Erbeznik, Jessica Farley, Kathryne Feary, Greg Fick, Alison Finkelmeier, Margaret Flores, Timothy Flowers, Elizabeth Fox, John Frenk, Kimberly Furrer, Evelyn Gentry, Nathan George, John Georgievski,Sean Giambattista, Lisa Gibson, Amanda Glowacki,Kevin Grande, Kendal Gulbrandsen, Chip Habegger, Jana Hageman, Shane Hageman, Stephen Harper, Alec Hass, Jason Henderson, Kathryn Hiddle, Christopher Edwin Hopkins-Gillispie, Benjamin Hugon, Jesse James, Julie Jansen, Matthew Jenner, Amy Jensen, Kara Jensen, Daniel Johns, Lydia Johns, Jacob Johnson, Benjamin Jones, Randall Jones, Joseph Kassab, Caitlin Kerr, David Kim, Larissa Koshatka, Katherine LaBeau, Kurt Laird, Adebola Lamikanra, Krystal Lechner, Xinran Li, Winston Lin, Lance Lindeen, Brian Lohnes, Jonathan Long, Jesse Lothamer, Lacee Louderback, Austin Lumbard, Mehek Manawalia, Anthony Marek, Andrei Marks, Erin McAdams, Alison McCormick, Colin McCready, Jonathan McPike, Misty Mercer, Jessica Meredith, Ashley Michael, Jason Mizzell, Yoni Moise, Michael Morris, Megal Mullett, Christopher Nevels, Ryan Nicholson, Christopher Nusbaum, David Oberly, Ann O\u27Connor, Kevin O\u27Neill, Benjamin Parmet, Andrew Pendexter, Ryann Perlinski, Katherine Peterson, Matthew Petra, Andrew Pittman, Alexander Platte, Jonathan Postema, Gregory Pottorff, Amy Price, Zachary Raibley, Timothy Renfro, Joshua Robare, Justin Roddye, David Rosenberg, Sarah Ruhlen, Samantha Salisbury, Alicia Sanders, Melissa Sauer, Ashley Schneider, David Schwarz, Jesal Shah, Megan Shipley, Catherine Siebecker, Alexander Simpson, Conor Slocum, Deirdre Lynch Smith, Jessica Smith, Patrick Smith, Jessica Sosa, Aaron Spolarich, Elizabeth Steele, Abbey Stamler, Christopher Stoker, Gregory Sturm, Andrew Tan, Michelle Tanyhill, Macey Thompson, Gregory Touney, Christopher Lloyd Tucker, Gina Venturelli, Jason Wallace, Zhuhao Wang, Allison Weimer, Rachel Wetzel, Alanna Whybrew, Luke Williams, Seth Williams, Therese Williams, Ingrid Winston, Sarah Yusuf, Jing Zhang, and Christine Zook.
Not pictured:
Amir Raza Ali, Jacob Atz, Elizabeth Ann Baldwin,Jeffrey Block, Syed Bokhari, Jessica Boyd, Daniel Bradley, Allison Cardinal, Robert Clark, Noah Ellenberg, Lori Anne Johnston, Kiersten Ann Kamman, Jessica Ann Kruse, Douglas Line, Rodan Luo, Lauren Outlaw, Jonathan Powers, Leslie Prill, Noah Priluck, Joshua Radicke, Hudson Thomas Rowland, Matthew Ruher, Stephen Schwartz, Renee Skeeta, Mia So, Abbey Rae Stemler, Andrew Williams, and Noah Williams.
The Recognition Ceremony Program for the Class of 2011 can be found here.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/composite/1035/thumbnail.jp
The eventual rejection of the linear no‐threshold theory will lead to a drastic reduction in the demand for diagnostic medical physics services
No full text- …
