16 research outputs found
Banned Books Week Panel
No full textPanelists include: Allene Nichols, Assistant Professor of English Education at MUW Toby Price, Former Gary Road Elementary School Assistant Principal Tonja Johnson, Madison County Library System Director
The panel will be moderated by Hillary Richardson, Coordinator of Undergraduate Researc
PhT Class 1987
No full textOn photo: First row (left to right): Nancy Hall Armstrong, Cindy Cone, Pam Doan, Shelley Downer Koehler, Tonja Erickson, Marcella HaileySecond row (left to right): Patricia Hoover, Joyce Kracht, Susan Lenk, Judy Long Johnson, Karen Maloy Linn, Brenda MasonThird row (left to right): David Schremmer, Linda Berggren Sergeant, Lee Ann Sherry, Regina Spaay, Lisa StephensFourth row (left to right): Susan Tomenendal, Lisa Wendorf, Sondra Wilhite Kitch, Brian YockersDigitized by University Libraries' Technical Services Institutional Repository & Digitization group.Personal and non-profit use only. Contact [email protected] if you have any questions
»Zahtevam konfiskacijo in uničenje že ekspediranih izvodov!«: Čerinova razprava o slovenskih protestantskih pesmaricah in zapleti okoli njene objave
No full textThe publication of Josip Čerin’s doctoral thesis on Slovenian Protestant hymns in Trubarjev zbornik in 1908 gave rise to bitter complaints from the author. His original doctoral thesis is unfortunately lost. However, the extant documentation – especially his correspondence and a copy of the printed essay with his own manuscript comments and corrections – contains a wealth of key facts about the dispute between Josip Čerin and Slovenska matica, the publisher of the volume.Objava prevoda doktorske disertacije Josipa Čerina o slovenskih protestantskih pesmih v Trubarjevem zborniku leta 1908 je povzročila hudo avtorjevo kritiko. Žal je doktorska naloga izgubljena, vendar je v ohranjeni dokumentaciji, predvsem korespondenci in avtorsko popravljenem izvodu natisa, veliko ključnih podatkov v zvezi s sporom med Čerinom in uredništvom Slovenske matice
Methodological issues concercing Emotional-Intelligence-Tests
No full textÜber das Konstrukt Emotionale Intelligenz, verstanden als die Fähigkeit emotionale Informationen wahrzunehmen, zu nutzen, zu verstehen und zu regulieren (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 2000), wird in der psychologischen Forschungsgemeinde seit nunmehr gut 25 Jahren rege und kontrovers diskutiert. Trotz großer Forschungsbemühungen können nach wie vor verschiedene Fragen zu Konzeption, Messung und Validierung nicht eindeutig oder nur unzureichend beantwortet werden. Die Forschungsfragen der vorliegenden Dissertation lauten daher: 1. Was passiert, wenn ein Emotionale-Intelligenz-Test mit unterschiedlichen Scorings ausgewertet wird und welche Scorings sind für die Anwendung zu empfehlen? 2. Inwiefern wirkt sich ein geändertes Antwortformat („Ankreuzen“ vs. „Zuordnen“) auf Ergebnisse eines Emotionale-Intelligenz-Tests, dem Videobasierten Test zur Erfassung der Emotionalen Intelligenz im Pflegeberuf (ViTEIP-V2), aus? 3. Ist ein videobasierter Präsentationsmodus für den ViTEIP-V2 geeignet?
In die erste Untersuchung flossen die Daten von N=113 überwiegend studentischen Teilnehmern ein. An der zweiten Untersuchung beteiligten sich insgesamt sieben Altenhilfe- und Krankenpflegeschulen, woraus sich zwei Stichproben mit N=138 und N=122 generierten. Alle Teilnehmer bearbeiteten die beiden Leistungstests zur Erfassung von Emotionaler Intelligenz ViTEIP-V2 und TEMINT (Schmidt-Atzert & Bühner, 2002) sowie weitere Verfahren.
Aus der vorliegenden Arbeit ergibt sich die Empfehlung, auf sogenannte targetbasierte Scorings zurückzugreifen, bei denen die Auswertung über einen Vergleich zwischen der Antwort der Probanden und den situationsgebenden Originalpersonen (Target) erfolgt. Neben grundlegenden kritischen Einwänden bezüglich des Konsensscorings (d.h Verwendung der Mehrheitsmeinung zur Bestimmung der korrekten Antwort), sprechen eine höhere Varianz und Reliabilität sowie etwas deutlichere Validitätsbelege für den Einsatz von Targetscorings. Die Auswirkungen, die sich durch auf Seiten der Probanden auftretende Antworttendenzen (Bias) ergaben, konnten durch drei neu entwickelte targetbasierte Scoringprozeduren nivelliert werden.
Mit der Auswertung über Antwortprofile im Kontext der Profilauswertung wurde der Einfluss des Bias auf das Testergebnisses deutlich reduziert; aufgrund geringer Reliabilitäten ist ein Einsatz dieses Scorings nur bedingt zu empfehlen. Der für den zweiten Scoringansatz aus der Signalentdeckungstheorie entliehene Kennwert „Detektionsleistung“ ermöglichte eine überwiegend biasfreie Leistungserfassung. Für die Auswertung des ViTEIP-V2 und TEMINT zu präferieren ist aus Sicht der Autorin jedoch ein Scoring, bei dem eine Aufteilung der Items zu den zwei Kennwerten „Emotionale Sensitivität“ (Umgang mit vorhandenen Emotionen) und „Emotionale Spezifität“ (Umgang mit nicht vorhandenen Emotionen) erfolgte. Mit dieser Auswertung wurden die Effekte, die sich aus den spezifischen Ankreuzverhalten der Probanden ergaben, deutlich minimiert; die generellen Korrelationsmuster zur Validität konnten zudem mittels der Aufteilung in zwei Kennwerte besser erklärt werden als mit nur einem Kennwert. Einige Fragen bezüglich der Validität von ViTEIP-V2 und TEMINT blieben, unabhängig vom eingesetzten Scoring, offen.
Eine Veränderung des Antwortformates beeinflusste die Probanden deutlich in ihrem Antwortverhalten. Der hohe Aufforderungscharakter bezüglich der Nutzung der Antwortkategorie „Emotion nicht vorhanden“, den das Antwortformat „Zuordnen“ im Vergleich zu „Ankreuzen“ auf die Probanden hatte, verzerrte die Abbildung der tatsächlichen Leistungsfähigkeit. Von einer Verwendung des Formats „Zuordnen“ wird daher abgeraten. Die Vorteile, die verschiedene Autoren im Einsatz von videobasierten im Vergleich zu textbasierten Tests sehen, bestätigten sich in dieser Arbeit für den ViTEIP nicht. Aus Sicht der Autorin gilt es daher sorgfältig abzuwägen, ob sich der Aufwand lohnt, den die Entwicklung und der Einsatz von videobasierten Verfahren erfordern, wenn sich keine Vorteile für diesen Präsentationsmodus ergeben.
Die vorliegende Arbeit trägt durch die Untersuchung methodischer Fragen und der Entwicklung neuer Scorings dazu bei, die Erfassung des Konstrukts Emotionale Intelligenz zu verbessern. Die Ergebnisse bezüglich der Unterscheidung in „Emotionale Sensitivität“ und „Emotionale Spezifität“ stellen die Annahme, bei Emotionaler Intelligenz handele es sich um ein eindimensionales und homogenes Konstrukt, in Frage und regen zu weiteren Forschungen an. Da nicht auszuschließen ist, dass die methodischen Aspekte Scoring, Antwortformat und Präsentationsmodus in einem komplexeren Zusammenhang stehen als aus den vorliegenden Datensätzen berechnet werden konnte, bietet es sich an, zukünftige Untersuchungen so zu konzipieren, dass alle drei Faktoren systematisch innerhalb einer Stichprobe analysiert werden können.The construct of emotional intelligence, defined as the ability to perceive, to use, to understand and to regulate emotional information (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 2000), has now been lively and controversially discussed for more than 25 years. Despite extensive research, different questions about conceptualization, measurement and validation can only be inconclusively or insufficiently answered. Research questions of this doctoral thesis are therefore: 1. What happens when a test of emotional intelligence is evaluated with different scorings? Which scoring is to be recommended? 2. How does a different response format (“Ticking“ vs. “Allocating“) influence results of an emotional-intelligence-test, the ViTEIP-V2 (Videobasierter Test zur Erfassung der Emotionalen Intelligenz im Pflegeberuf)? 3. Is a video-based presentation appropriate for the ViTEIP-V2?
In the first study, data of N=113 mostly student participants were collected. In the second study, two samples of N=138 and N=122 were recruited from seven nurse's training schools. All participants completed the two performance tests of emotional intelligence ViTEIP-V2 and TEMINT (Schmidt-Atzert & Bühner, 2002) and further tests.
After data evaluation, the author recommends utilization of so-called target-based scorings. Target-based scorings involve a comparison of the participants’ answers and the answer of the target-person who provided information on the situation. Beyond fundamental critical objections referring consensus-scorings (using majority view to generate the correct response-option), higher variance and reliability as well as slightly better validity favor the use of target-based scorings. Three newly developed target-based scorings were able to reduce influence of an existing participant’s response bias.
Use of response profiles as scoring method significantly reduced bias. Due to low reliability of this scoring, the profile evaluation is only conditionally recommended. The parameter “Discriminability index“, deriving from signal detection theory, was used within the scope of a second scoring. It enabled a predominantly bias-free data collection. Splitting items into two parameters “Emotional Sensitivity“ (dealing with existing emotions) and “Emotional Specificity“ (dealing with absent emotions) led to the preferred scoring technique for ViTEIP-V2 and TEMINT. Effects on participants’ answering strategies were minimized and interpretation of correlations concerning validity was much better with two parameters compared to one single parameter. Independent of the scorings, some questions regarding validity of ViTEIP-V2 and TEMINT remain unanswered.
Change of the response format from “Ticking“ to “Allocating“ had an influence on subjects’ responses. A high demanding character of “Allocating“ compared to “Ticking“ led to an increased use of the answering option “no emotion”. As actual performance capabilities were distorted, the usage of “Allocating“ is not recommended. In this study, expected benefits of a video-based version compared to a text-based version of ViTEIP were not supported. If there are no advantages of a video-based test, the author suggests careful consideration of the efforts that the development and administration of such tests require.
By analyzing methodical questions and developing new scorings, the present work contributes to improve measurement of emotional intelligence. Particularly regarding results on the differentiation between “Emotional Sensitivity” and “Emotional Specificity” challenges the assumption of an unidimensional and homogenous construct of emotional intelligence. Further research is suggested, as existing data does not allow systematic analysis of scoring, response format and presentation mode within one sample. To generate future studies in a way where a possible complex relationship of all three factors can be simultaneously analyzed is recommended
The Elements of Crime Genre in the Collections of Award-Winning Authors of Fabula
No full textV diplomskem delu Elementi kriminalnega žanra v zbirkah nagrajenih avtorjev fabule smo poudarili temeljno razliko med detektivko in kriminalko, podrobneje smo opisali razvoj slovenske kriminalke, prikazali smo bistvene razlike med klasično in trdo detektivsko zgodbo, s katerima se da dobro opisati slovensko kriminalko pred drugo svetovno vojno, podali smo temeljna pravila pisanja kriminalnega romana, ki jih je leta 1928 zapisal S. S. Van Dine (Žižek, Močnik 1982: 12‒17), ameriški pisec detektivskih romanov, opisali smo bistveno vsebinsko in strukturno določilo kriminalke – uganko ter podali značilnosti kriminalke v kratki prozi.
Osrednji del diplomskega dela predstavlja sedem avtorjev, ki so prejeli nagrado fabula. Prejemniki nagrad so bili Nejc Gazvoda z zbirko kratke proze Vevericam nič ne uide (2004), Katarina Marinčič z zbirko kratke proze O treh (2005), Maruša Krese z zbirko kratke proze Vsi moji božiči (2006), Peter Rezman z zbirko kratke proze Skok iz kože (2008), Vesna Lemaić z zbirko kratke proze Popularne zgodbe (2008), Lado Kralj z zbirko kratke proze Kosec koso brusi (2010) ter Dušan Čater z zbirko kratke proze Džehenem (2010). Po predstavitvi avtorjev in nagrajene zbirke smo v naštetih zbirkah kratke proze podrobneje analizirali tiste kratke pripovedi, pri katerih smo po podrobnejši analizi ugotovili, da zajemajo elemente kriminalnega žanrate kratke pripovedi so naslednje: Stanje ljubezni in zaupanja, Grobarček in Vevericam nič ne uide Nejca Gazvode, Redouté, slikar in Zlatko iz Litije Katarine Marinčič, Beli oblaček Petra Rezmana, Lovci na občutke, Tisočšeststoti razgovor za službo in Nedolžnost Vesne Lemaić, Država in revolucija Lada Kralja ter Geografija je zajebana stvar in Holliday in Cambodia Dušana Čatra. Iz analize smo izločili zbirko Maruše Krese Vsi moji božiči, čeprav je za svojo zbirko prejela nagrado fabula, vendar v njeni zbirki elementov kriminalnega žanra nismo zaznali.
Podrobnejša analiza je pokazala, da so prvine kriminalke v izbranih pripovedih sicer uporabljene, vendar fragmentarno, kakor jih omogoča sama kratka forma pripovedi. Prav tako pa je v pripovedih opazen odmik od kriminalnega žanra, tako da ne moremo govoriti o pravi kriminalki, saj za kriminalko velja, da je toliko bolj mojstrska, kolikor bolj se ujema s pravili književnovrstne sheme, ki ji pripada.In the thesis titled The Elements of Crime Genre in the Collections of Award-Winning Authors of Fabula, the emphasis is on the fundamental difference between a detective and a crime novel as well as on the description of the development of the Slovenian crime novel. Furthermore, the essential differences between the classical and the hardboiled detective story, which can be used for the description of the Slovenian crime novel before World War II, were presented. The fundamental rules for writing crime novels, written in 1928 by S. S. Van Dine (Žižek, Močnik 1982: 12-17), an American author of detective novels, were introduced. Moreover, essential content and structure of a crime novel – a puzzle, as well as the characteristics of a crime novel in short prose were described.
The main part of the thesis presents seven Fabula Award-winning authors. These authors are Nejc Gazvoda with the collection of short prose Vevericam nič ne uide (2004), Katarina Marinčič with the collection of short prose O treh (2005), Maruša Krese with the collection of short prose Vsi moji božiči (2006), Peter Rezman with the collection of short prose Skok iz kože (2008), Vesna Lemaić with the collection of short prose Popularne zgodbe (2008), Lado Kralj with the collection of short prose Kosec koso brusi (2010) and Dušan Čater with the collection of short prose Džehenem (2010). After introducing the award-winning authors and their collections, we analysed those short stories in the mentioned collections that, after a more thorough analysis, had been established to include the elements of the crime genre. These short stories are the following: Stanje ljubezni in zaupanja, Grobarček and Vevericam nič ne uide written by Nejc Gazvoda, Redouté, slikar and Zlatko iz Litije written by Katarina Marinčič, Beli oblaček written by Peter Rezman, Lovci na občutke, Tisočšeststoti razgovor za službo and Nedolžnost written by Vesna Lemaić, Država in revolucija written by Lado Kralj as well as Geografija je zajebana stvar and Holliday in Cambodia written by Dušan Čater. The collection of Maruša Krese Vsi moji božiči was excluded from the analysis, even though she received the Fabula Award for this collection, due to the lack of the elements of the crime genre in it.
A more detailed analysis showed that the elements of a crime novel were used in the chosen stories, yet fragmentarily, as it is possible for them to be used in such short form of stories. The deviation from the crime genre is noticeable in the storiestherefore, they cannot be considered real crime novels, since a crime novel is as great of a masterpiece as well it follows the rules of the literary genre it belongs to
Oral Argument in The Time of Covid: The Chief Plays Calvinball
No full textIn this Article, we empirically assess the Supreme Court’s experiment in hearing telephonic oral arguments. We compare the telephonic hearings to those heard in-person by the current Court and examine whether the justices followed norms of fairness and equality. We show that the telephonic forum changed the dynamics of oral argument in a way that gave the Chief Justice new power, and that Chief Justice Roberts, knowingly or unknowingly, used that new power to benefit his ideological allies. We also show that the Chief interrupted the female justices disproportionately more than the male justices and gave the male justices more substantive opportunity to have their questions answered.
This analysis transcends the significance of individual cases. The fact that the Court experimented with telephonic oral argument, the way it did so, and how the practice could be improved are all issues of profound national importance. The new format had the potential to influence the outcome of cases that have broad national significance, to shift norms of equality and transparency at the Court, and more generally to affect judicial legitimacy. If the Court favors certain parties or certain ideological camps by its choice of forum in a time of crisis, then that will undermine not only the Court’s claim to legitimacy but it also raises doubts whether any of our national institutions have the capacity to adapt to crises more generally
ARR Data Collection Initiative 2025
No full textDataset of peer review reports, meta-reviews, reviewer-author discussions, and paper drafts collected from ACL Rolling Review within the context of the new data collection initiative (https://arr-data.aclweb.org/protocol/). All included data is explicitly licensed by the authors and reviewers for publication. This dataset is not meant for commercial purposes. This dataset should not be used for pre-training of neural models such as large language models.
V1 contains accepted paper data from COLING 2025 and NAACL 2025.
V1.1 and V1.1.1 contain accepted paper data from ACL 2025 (V1.1.1 contatins data from ARR 2024 December and ARR 2025 February, and V1.1 contains only data from ARR 2025 February).
V1.2 contains ARR 2024 April and June submissions that did not appear in EMNLP 2024, released after a one-year grace period with explicit author consent.
V1.3 contains accepted paper data from EMNLP 2025
ARR Data Collection Initiative 2025
No full textDataset of peer review reports, meta-reviews, reviewer-author discussions, and paper drafts collected from ACL Rolling Review within the context of the new data collection initiative (https://arr-data.aclweb.org/protocol/). All included data is explicitly licensed by the authors and reviewers for publication. This dataset is not meant for commercial purposes. This dataset should not be used for pre-training of neural models such as large language models. The newly released version v1.1 is the data from ACL 2025
ARR Data Collection Initiative 2024
No full textDataset of peer review reports, meta-reviews, reviewer-author discussions, and paper drafts collected from ACL Rolling Review within the context of the new data collection initiative (https://arr-data.aclweb.org/protocol/). All included data is explicitly licensed by the authors and reviewers for publication. This dataset is not meant for commercial purposes. This dataset should not be used for pre-training of neural models such as large language models.
Version v.1 is the base version.
Version v.1.1 now also includes camera-ready PDFs of Findings papers. Download this newest version!
Going Above and Beyond: Developing Anti-Oppressive Strategies in Counselor Education Programs
No full textThe field of counseling, which emphasizes anti-racist values, would seem to be an affirming, safe place due to progressive multicultural and social justice competencies. Sadly, these aspirations only materialize partially in training programs. In counselor education, critical gaps and oversights still exist even with the emphasis on cultural responsiveness. For example, many students from historically marginalized groups report experiences of discrimination and unfair biases when navigating their programs. This session will create a space to share common lived experiences felt by students and faculty to start the process of dismantling oppressive environments on multiple levels. From day-to-day experiences to systemic practices such as promotion/tenure processes, the presenters will share extensive literature and lived experiences. Participants will have a chance to share thoughts and identify areas for them to take the initiative to dismantle oppressive practices in counseling
