1,996,653 research outputs found

    John Wiley ; Sons Prince List

    No full text
    233hal.;30c

    John Wiley Sons Ltd Guidelines For Preparing A Manuscript Using L

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION The John Wiley & Sons L A T E X book style is an option which should be used with the standard L A T E X book style to create either single- or multiple-author (contributed) books. Fully marked-up examples of both types of book, including the preliminary pages, table of contents, a chapter, references, appendix and an index are provided. The single-author book example can be found in lasample.tex, and the contributed book one in cbook.tex, which includes a chapter jwcbsp01.tex. BEGINNING A BOOK Single-author book Each book starts with the information required for the title page, then the call for the table of contents, and the start of the first chapter, as follows: \documentstyle[jwbook]{book} \begin{document} \title{\LaTeX \\ Sample Output} \edition{First Edition} \author{J. SMITH} \affiliation{Text Processing, John Wiley \& Son

    [Letter from Benjamin R. Harris to John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated - June 28, 1934]

    No full text
    Letter from Benjamin R. Harris to John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated and Miss T. A. Keyes, informing them that he received Dr. Meyer Bodansky's new textbook

    [Telegram from John Wiley and Sons Publishing to Dr. Meyer Bodansky - December 3, 1926]

    No full text
    Telegram from John Wiley and Sons Publishing to Dr. Meyer Bodansky on December 3rd, 1926, informing Dr. Bodansky that he has permission to use information from other scholarly works in his upcoming textbook about physiological chemistry

    [Telegram to Dr. Meyer Bodansky from John Wiley and Sons Publishing - April 19, 1930]

    No full text
    Telegram from John Wiley and Sons Publishing to Dr. Meyer Bodansky, dated April 9th, 1930. The telegram states that it is not necessary to attribute a table from the book "Sherman's Chemistry.

    An approach to verifying and debugging simulation models governed by ordinary differential equations: Part 1. Methodology for residual generation

    No full text
    For dynamic simulations to be credible, verification of the computer code must be an integral part of the modelling process. This two-part paper describes a novel approach to verification through program testing and debugging. In Part 1, a methodology is presented for detecting and isolating coding errors using back-to-back testing. Residuals are generated by comparing the output of two independent implementations, in response to identical inputs. The key feature of the methodology is that a specially modified observer is created using one of the implementations, so as to impose an error-dependent structure on these residuals. Each error can be associated with a fixed and known subspace, permitting errors to be isolated to specific equations in the code. It is shown that the geometric properties extend to multiple errors in either one of the two implementations. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd

    Foundations and Change in Early Childhood Education

    No full text
    Originally published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    An approach to verifying and debugging simulation models governed by ordinary differential equations: Part 2. Residuals analysis and a case study

    No full text
    In Part 1 of this paper a methodology for back-to-back testing of simulation software was described. Residuals with error-dependent geometric properties were generated. A set of potential coding errors was enumerated, along with a corresponding set of feature matrices, which describe the geometric properties imposed on the residuals by each of the errors. In this part of the paper, an algorithm is developed to isolate the coding errors present by analysing the residuals. A set of errors is isolated when the subspace spanned by their combined feature matrices corresponds to that of the residuals. Individual feature matrices are compared to the residuals and classified as 'definite', 'possible' or 'impossible'. The status of 'possible' errors is resolved using a dynamic subset testing algorithm. To demonstrate and validate the testing methodology presented in Part 1 and the isolation algorithm presented in Part 2, a case study is presented using a model for biological wastewater treatment. Both single and simultaneous errors that are deliberately introduced into the simulation code are correctly detected and isolated. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd

    John Wiley & Sons Publishers p.1

    No full text
    John Wiley & Sons Publishers building progress, 1530 S. Redwood Rd., Apr. 20, 1962
    corecore