1,720,962 research outputs found

    Synergistic effect of thymosin alpha 1 and alpha beta-interferon on NK activity in tumor-bearing mice

    No full text
    We have investigated the possibility of thymosin alpha 1 (TH) cooperating with alpha beta-interferon (IFN) in boosting natural killer (NK) activity in tumor-bearing, immunosuppressed mice in vivo. Treatment with a single injection of 30,000 IU of IFN 24 h before testing enhanced NK activity in tumor-bearing mice if the IFN was administered 9 days after tumor inoculation, when the animals have normal NK responsiveness. On the other hand, the same treatment led to lower or no improvement of NK responses if the treatment was given 13 or 17 days after tumor inoculation, at a time when tumor growth causes immunosuppression. However, combination treatment with TH (200 micrograms/kg) for 4 days, followed by IFN was found to restore normal NK cell activity. Selective depletion of antigen-positive cells showed that killer cells stimulated by combination treatment with TH and IFN seem to bear phenotypic characteristics of NK cells. These studies provide the first documentation of a novel combination approach to reconstitution of immunosuppressed tumor-bearing mice using TH and IFN. We hypothesize that TH restores NK boosting activity by IFN by effecting the differentiation/induction of precursor populations of IFN-responsive cells

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore