1,721,053 research outputs found
Supplemental Material, SPPS-Authorship-Change-Request-Form-2018---fillable-PDF-2 - God Values the Lives of My Out-Group More Than I Do: Evidence From Fiji and Israel
No full textSupplemental Material, SPPS-Authorship-Change-Request-Form-2018---fillable-PDF-2 for God Values the Lives of My Out-Group More Than I Do: Evidence From Fiji and Israel by Michael H. Pasek, Crystal Shackleford, Julia M. Smith, Allon Vishkin, Anne Lehner and Jeremy Ginges in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231158576 – Supplemental material for Thinking About God Encourages Prosociality Toward Religious Outgroups: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231158576 for Thinking About God Encourages Prosociality Toward Religious Outgroups: A Cross-Cultural Investigation by Michael H. Pasek, John Michael Kelly, Crystal Shackleford, Cindel J. M. White, Allon Vishkin, Julia M. Smith, Ara Norenzayan, Azim Shariff and Jeremy Ginges in Psychological Science</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Contextual effects on intergroup generosity in Fiji
No full textWe are investigating moral norms in two Fijian communities, Christian iTaukei and Hindu Indo Fijian, regarding distribution of money in intergroup interactions. Prior work, and work in small focus groups, suggests relatively low levels of ingroup bias in different economic games. This is despite significant levels of intergroup conflict and animosity. Moreover, we find that thinking about God, which might be conceptualized as a reinforcer of moral norms, leads to increased levels of generosity to both ingroup and outgroup members. Here we preregister two distinct studies that build on this work. Study 1 will investigate if ingroup bias becomes more prevalent if the outgroup recipient in an economic game is implied to be an actor in intergroup hostilities. Study 2 will investigate if intergroup generosity decreases if the outgroup recipient in an economic game is implied to be an actor in intergroup hostilities, and will ask if thinking about God exacerbates these effects or conversely, whether the effect of thinking about God on outgroup generosity endures even when an actor is implicated in hostilities. While these studies could be published together, they may be published in separate papers alongside other work done in different contexts
The moral logic of political violence
No full textThere is a moral logic to reasoning about political violence. People will often fight not for individual or collective material gain, but because of their commitment to abstract moral and sacred ideas. Moreover, decisions to support or oppose war are descriptively deontological, and are relatively insensitive to material costs or benefits
Self-sacrifice for a cause: The role of ideas and beliefs in motivating human conflict
No full textThe role of ideas and beliefs is generally underplayed in Whitehouse’s account. However, just as people may feel that their identity is fused with a collective, they may also feel that their identity is fused with an idea (god, history, justice), which can motivate the same type of behaviors that Whitehouse seeks to explain
The moral logic of political violence
No full textThere is a moral logic to reasoning about political violence. People will often fight not for individual or collective material gain, but because of their commitment to abstract moral and sacred ideas. Moreover, decisions to support or oppose war are descriptively deontological, and are relatively insensitive to material costs or benefits
- …
