208,952 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
A Get Well Soon Card from Jen and Rachel Wilken to Dr. Hector P. Garcia.
A Get Well Soon Card from Jen and Rachel Wilken to Dr. Hector P. Garcia
sj-pdf-1-jen-10.1177_17442591211056067 – Supplemental material for Hygrothermal performance of a brick wall with interior insulation in cold climate: Vapour open versus vapour tight approach
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jen-10.1177_17442591211056067 for Hygrothermal performance of a brick wall with interior insulation in cold climate: Vapour open versus vapour tight approach by Paul Klõšeiko and Targo Kalamees in Journal of Building Physics</p
sj-docx-1-jen-10.1177_17442591231195639 – Supplemental material for Hygrothermal performance of natural building materials: Simulations and field monitoring of a case study home made of wood fiber insulation and clay
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jen-10.1177_17442591231195639 for Hygrothermal performance of natural building materials: Simulations and field monitoring of a case study home made of wood fiber insulation and clay by Diane Bastien, Martin Winther-Gaasvig, Jeppe Zhang Andersson, Zhe Xiao and Hua Ge in Journal of Building Physics</p
sj-pdf-1-jen-10.1177_10.1177_17442591211045418 – Supplemental material for Adaptive opaque façades and their potential to reduce thermal energy use in residential buildings: A simulation-based evaluation
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jen-10.1177_10.1177_17442591211045418 for Adaptive opaque façades and their potential to reduce thermal energy use in residential buildings: A simulation-based evaluation by Miren Juaristi, Fabio Favoino, Tomás Gómez-Acebo and Aurora Monge-Barrio in Journal of Building Physics</p
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Public Support for the Financing of RD&D Activities in New Clean Energy Technologies
Several market failures, as well as other technical, economic and regulatory barriers to the market penetration of clean energy technologies result in under-investment of private innovators in RD&D. Therefore, public support is needed in order to induce innovations. Policy tools creating market conditions that are attractive for the exploitation of clean technologies (market pull) must be combined with other tools directly supporting the development of these technologies through the provision of public funds (technology push). Thereby, financing policy instruments should be chosen so that their characteristics match with those of the specific innovation process being targeted at the same time that social welfare is maximized. We develop an analytical framework to define the form of public support and to provide recommendations on the optimal choice of both technology push and market pull instruments.clean energy technologies; innovation finance; public support; technology push; market pull
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Jen-Chun-Hsiang/FCSS: Release the repository
<p>The code for spatial-constrained functional segmentation was implemented for "Local processing in neurites of VGluT3-expressing amacrine cells differentially organizes visual information" in eLife.</p>
- …
