1,721,101 research outputs found

    van_assche_online_appendix – Supplemental material for The Diversity Challenge for High and Low Authoritarians: Multilevel and Longitudinal Effects Through Intergroup Contact and Threat

    No full text
    Supplemental material, van_assche_online_appendix for The Diversity Challenge for High and Low Authoritarians: Multilevel and Longitudinal Effects Through Intergroup Contact and Threat by Jasper Van Assche, Frank Asbrock, Kristof Dhont, and Arne Roets in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p

    Supplemental Material, SPPS-19-0288_-_Supplemental_materials - Can Psychological Interventions Improve Intergroup Attitudes Post Terror Attacks?

    No full text
    Supplemental Material, SPPS-19-0288_-_Supplemental_materials for Can Psychological Interventions Improve Intergroup Attitudes Post Terror Attacks? by Jasper Van Assche, Masi Noor, Kim Dierckx, Muniba Saleem, Pierre Bouchat, Laura de Guissme, Dries Bostyn, Mark Carew, Andreea Ernst-Vintila and Melody M. Chao in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p

    Religion and Prejudice Across Cultures: A Test of the Threat-Constraint Model

    Get PDF
    sponsorship: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: This research was partially supported by a postdoctoral research grant from the Research Foundation -Flanders (FWO) awarded to Jasper Van Assche (FWO.3E0.2018.0049.01) under supervision of Arne Roets. (Research Foundation -Flanders (FWO)|FWO.3E0.2018.0049.01)status: Publishe

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore