1,721,001 research outputs found
Imaging, Biomarker, and Clinical Predictors of Cardiac Remodeling in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
No full textIn response to injury, hemodynamic changes, or neurohormonal activation, the heart undergoes a series of structural and functional changes that have been termed cardiac remodeling. Remodeling is defined as changes in cardiac geometry and/or function over time and can be measured in terms of changes in cardiac chamber dimensions, wall thickness, volumes, mass, and ejection fraction at serial imaging examinations. As to cardiac chambers, left ventricular (LV) remodeling has been best studied in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although LV remodeling may compensate for abnormal hemodynamic parameters and function in the short term, left unchecked, it is associated with worsening cardiac function and poor prognosis. On the other hand, reversing LV geometry and/or function closer to that of a normal heart (also known as reverse remodeling) is associated with improved cardiac function and better prognosis. Because of its close relationship with clinical outcomes, remodeling may potentially be targeted in clinical management and used in trials as a surrogate endpoint. Standardized definition of remodeling and reliable tools to predict and monitor the presence, direction, and magnitude of cardiac remodeling are needed. Together with clinical and imaging findings, circulating biomarkers (most notably N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity troponin, and soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2) may be helpful in this respect
Clinical and Prognostic Significance of sST2 in Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week
No full textSoluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) is released in response to vascular congestion and inflammatory and profibrotic stimuli, and is a strong, independent predictor of mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with acute or chronic HF. sST2 meets 2 fundamental criteria for clinically useful biomarkers: accurate, repeated measurements are available at a reasonable cost, and the biomarker provides information not already available from a careful clinical assessment. In particular, the prognostic value of sST2 is additive to natriuretic peptides and (in the case of chronic HF) to high-sensitivity troponin T. Nevertheless, the need for a multibiomarker approach to risk stratification and the role of sST2 as a guide to therapy decision-making remain to be established. Four years after a consensus document on sST2, and following major advances in the comprehension of the clinical value of this biomarker, the authors felt it worthwhile to reappraise current knowledge on sST2 in HF. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Acute Reversible Stress-induced Cardiomyopathy Associated with Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia.
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
