1,721,198 research outputs found
Prof Jane Simpson
No full textJane Simpson majored in Chinese and English literature at ANU, followed by honours in Middle English and an MA in Linguistics (1977). She spent 10 months in Moscow as an ANU exchange scholar (1977-78). She has carried out fieldwork on Indigenous Australian languages since 1979, and received a PhD in linguistics from MIT in 1983 for a study of Warlpiri in the Lexical-Functional Grammar framework. She was a Sloan postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University. She then worked in Central Australia on Warumungu language and language maintenance, and helped set up a language centre in Tennant Creek. She also carried out various consultancies (e.g. Aboriginal Legal Aid, Aboriginal Sacred Sites Protection Authority), and worked on the Warumungu land claims. In 1987-89 with David Nash she worked as lexicography fellow at the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, helping set up a digital archive of Aboriginal language material, which became ASEDA. In 1989 she became a lecturer in Linguistics at the University of Sydney. In 2005, with Mary Laughren and David Nash, she shared the Linguistics Society of America Summer Institute Inaugural Ken Hale Chair. In 2011 she moved to ANU as the inaugural chair of Indigenous linguistics and head of the School of Language Studies. In 2014 she stepped down as head of school and is now Deputy Director of the Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language
sj-docx-1-job-10.1177_23294884211069966 – Supplemental material for The Use of Humor in Employee-to-Employee Workplace Communication: A Systematic Review With Thematic Synthesis
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-job-10.1177_23294884211069966 for The Use of Humor in Employee-to-Employee Workplace Communication: A Systematic Review With Thematic Synthesis by Stephen Taylor, Jane Simpson and Claire Hardy in International Journal of Business Communication</p
Supplementary material2 - Supplemental material for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary material2 for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia by Garuth Chalfont, Christine Milligan and Jane Simpson in Dementia</p
Supplementary material1 - Supplemental material for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary material1 for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia by Garuth Chalfont, Christine Milligan and Jane Simpson in Dementia</p
Supplementary material4 - Supplemental material for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary material4 for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia by Garuth Chalfont, Christine Milligan and Jane Simpson in Dementia</p
Supplementary material3 - Supplemental material for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary material3 for A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia by Garuth Chalfont, Christine Milligan and Jane Simpson in Dementia</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
