29 research outputs found
Author Correction: On the replicability of diffusion weighted MRI-based brain-behavior models
No full text"Thank me therefore": Social Prestige, Probity and Self-determination of Nymue's character in Malory's "Le Morte Darthur"
No full textOperational art in the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic and vision of its development
No full textThe article familiarizes readers with author´s perspective on status of the operational Art in the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic (AF CR). He argues that the AF CR community of military "thinkers" has for a long time fallen behind of conceptual developments and discussion regarding operational art that have occurred in other NATO member´s countries. Although the "tactical experience" is vital, there exists "operational inexperience". A recovery of Czech operational art is necessary because if the AF CR is faced by a parallel requirement to be a global 'security contributor' and a possible regional 'security leader'. Future operational art must seek to reflect a conceptual framework and to integrate both emerging functions. With the view of developing a appropriate construct of 21st century operational art, the AF CR must take a number of reforms. Such reforms include adopting a functional approach to operational concept development, improving doctrines, developing comprehensive operation planning and establishing significant reforms into the professional military education system.</jats:p
Connecting Theory and Practice in LIS: The Training Model of the Information Resource Centers
No full textThe traditional LIS education is also essential as it provides the foundation for our profession. Also, the LIS theory explores the history and evolution of the librarianship in different era. The library science educators do review the LIS courses from time to time, because it isn’t one time job. As the nature of information sources changes, the sophistication of information technology advances, and the quantity of knowledge explodes; the job market of librarians itself demands revision and expansion in the curricula of the LIS.
Even if the curriculum of an LIS school is up to the mark, the institution is required to train its new information professionals. Every type of library (i.e. public, academic, or special etc.) has to impart a proper training to its employees for better performance and productivity.
At the same time, it is true that not all the libraries or their parent institutions can afford the expensive and sophisticated training model of the IRCs. However, if they put the professional training on priority and spend some resources and time on it, they can get best out of their employees. One way is to arrange the in-house training sessions at their libraries. Moreover, the libraries of the same kind or in the same region can coordinate training on different LIS modules. The Internet is itself a good learning, teaching and training tool. The information professional can improve the professional skills through reading the professional literature, becoming a member of professional association, and consulting the value added professional websites
List of referees for year 2017 / Список рецензетов за 2017. год / Spisak recenzenata za 2017. godinu
No full textAll submitted manuscripts relevant to the journal’s profile are reviewed. All referees are eminent experts in relevant fields, with papers published in these fields in the last three years. Editorial Board applies the iThenticate (CrossRef and CrossCheck) service for verifying the originality of submitted papers and for preventing duplicate publishing and plagiarism. Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. Reviews after the article has been published are allowed and encouraged for subsequent evaluation of papers and authors. A peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. / Издание осуществляет рецензирование всех поступающих в редакцию материалов, соответствующих ее тематике, с целью их экспертной оценки. Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистами по тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних 3 лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи. Редакция до момента предоставления статьи рецензентам должна проверить содержание работы на плагиат через системы iThenticate (CrossRef и CrossCheck). Редакция журнала проводит конфиденциальное рецензирование, применяя «двойной слепой метод». Авторы статьи и рецензенты не знают имен друг друга. Редакция разрешает и даже рекомендует рецензирование уже опубликованных статей, с целью дополнительной оценки деятельности авторов и их работ. Специалист-рецензент оказывает Редакции помощь в принятии решений, а при опосредственнойсвязи с авторами через редакцию, существует возможность оказания рецензентом помощи в улучшении текста работы. / Radi stručnog obrazloženja, svi članci koji odgovaraju tematici časopisa se recenziraju. Recenzenti su eminentni stručnjaci iz oblasti iz kojih su i teme radova koji im se šalju na recenziju. Potrebno je da iz tih oblasti recenzenti imaju objavljene radove u poslednje tri godine. Pre slanja na recenziju Redakcija proverava da li je sadržaj rukopisa plagijat, korišćenjem servisa iThenticate (CrossRef i CrossCheck).
Časopis primenjuje „dvostruki slepi postupak recenzije“ članaka, koji podrazumeva da autori ne znaju ko su im recenzenti, niti su recenzentima poznati autori. Redakcija dozvoljava i podstiče recenzije i posle objavljivanja članaka radi naknadnog vrednovanja autora i radova. Stručni recenzent pomaže Redakciji u donošenju odluke, a posredstvom kontakata sa autorima, preko Redakcije, može da pomogne i autorima na poboljšavanju teksta rada
List of referees for issue 1-2018 / Список рецензетов, к выпуску № 1-2018 / Spisak recenzenata za broj 1-2018
No full textAll submitted manuscripts relevant to the journal’s profile are reviewed. All referees are eminent experts in relevant fields, with papers published in these fields in the last three years. Editorial Board applies the iThenticate (CrossRef and CrossCheck) service for verifying the originality of submitted papers and for preventing duplicate publishing and plagiarism. Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. Reviews after the article has been published are allowed and encouraged for subsequent evaluation of papers and authors. A peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. / Издание осуществляет рецензирование всех поступающих в редакцию материалов, соответствующих ее тематике, с целью их экспертной оценки. Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистами по тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних 3 лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи. Редакция до момента предоставления статьи рецензентам должна проверить содержание работы на плагиат через системы iThenticate (CrossRef и CrossCheck). Редакция журнала проводит конфиденциальное рецензирование, применяя «двойной слепой метод». Авторы статьи и рецензенты не знают имен друг друга. Редакция разрешает и даже рекомендует рецензирование уже опубликованных статей, с целью дополнительной оценки деятельности авторов и их работ. Специалист-рецензент оказывает Редакции помощь в принятии решений, а при опосредственнойсвязи с авторами через редакцию, существует возможность оказания рецензентом помощи в улучшении текста работы. / Radi stručnog obrazloženja, svi članci koji odgovaraju tematici časopisa se recenziraju. Recenzenti su eminentni stručnjaci iz oblasti iz kojih su i teme radova koji im se šalju na recenziju. Potrebno je da iz tih oblasti recenzenti imaju objavljene radove u poslednje tri godine. Pre slanja na recenziju Redakcija proverava da li je sadržaj rukopisa plagijat, korišćenjem servisa iThenticate (CrossRef i CrossCheck).
Časopis primenjuje „dvostruki slepi postupak recenzije“ članaka, koji podrazumeva da autori ne znaju ko su im recenzenti, niti su recenzentima poznati autori. Redakcija dozvoljava i podstiče recenzije i posle objavljivanja članaka radi naknadnog vrednovanja autora i radova. Stručni recenzent pomaže Redakciji u donošenju odluke, a posredstvom kontakata sa autorima, preko Redakcije, može da pomogne i autorima na poboljšavanju teksta rada
List of referees for issue 1-2019 / Список рецензетов, к выпуску № 1-2019 / Spisak recenzenata za broj 1-2019
No full textAll submitted manuscripts relevant to the journal’s profile are reviewed. All referees are eminent experts in relevant fields, with papers published in these fields in the last three years. Editorial Board applies the iThenticate (CrossRef and CrossCheck) service for verifying the originality of submitted papers and for preventing duplicate publishing and plagiarism. Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. Reviews after the article has been published are allowed and encouraged for subsequent evaluation of papers and authors. A peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. / Издание осуществляет рецензирование всех поступающих в редакцию материалов, соответствующих ее тематике, с целью их экспертной оценки. Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистами по тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних 3 лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи. Редакция до момента предоставления статьи рецензентам должна проверить содержание работы на плагиат через системы iThenticate (CrossRef и CrossCheck). Редакция журнала проводит конфиденциальное рецензирование, применяя «двойной слепой метод». Авторы статьи и рецензенты не знают имен друг друга. Редакция разрешает и даже рекомендует рецензирование уже опубликованных статей, с целью дополнительной оценки деятельности авторов и их работ. Специалист-рецензент оказывает Редакции помощь в принятии решений, а при опосредственнойсвязи с авторами через редакцию, существует возможность оказания рецензентом помощи в улучшении текста работы. / Radi stručnog obrazloženja, svi članci koji odgovaraju tematici časopisa se recenziraju. Recenzenti su eminentni stručnjaci iz oblasti iz kojih su i teme radova koji im se šalju na recenziju. Potrebno je da iz tih oblasti recenzenti imaju objavljene radove u poslednje tri godine. Pre slanja na recenziju Redakcija proverava da li je sadržaj rukopisa plagijat, korišćenjem servisa iThenticate (CrossRef i CrossCheck).
Časopis primenjuje „dvostruki slepi postupak recenzije“ članaka, koji podrazumeva da autori ne znaju ko su im recenzenti, niti su recenzentima poznati autori. Redakcija dozvoljava i podstiče recenzije i posle objavljivanja članaka radi naknadnog vrednovanja autora i radova. Stručni recenzent pomaže Redakciji u donošenju odluke, a posredstvom kontakata sa autorima, preko Redakcije, može da pomogne i autorima na poboljšavanju teksta rada
List of referees for issue 1-2020 / Список рецензетов, к выпуску № 1-2020 / Spisak recenzenata za broj 1-2020
No full textAll submitted manuscripts relevant to the journal’s profile are reviewed. All referees are eminent experts in relevant fields, with papers published in these fields in the last three years. Editorial Board applies the iThenticate (CrossRef and CrossCheck) service for verifying the originality of submitted papers and for preventing duplicate publishing and plagiarism. Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. Reviews after the article has been published are allowed and encouraged for subsequent evaluation of papers and authors. A peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. / Издание осуществляет рецензирование всех поступающих в редакцию материалов, соответствующих ее тематике, с целью их экспертной оценки. Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистами по тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних 3 лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи. Редакция до момента предоставления статьи рецензентам должна проверить содержание работы на плагиат через системы iThenticate (CrossRef и CrossCheck). Редакция журнала проводит конфиденциальное рецензирование, применяя «двойной слепой метод». Авторы статьи и рецензенты не знают имен друг друга. Редакция разрешает и даже рекомендует рецензирование уже опубликованных статей, с целью дополнительной оценки деятельности авторов и их работ. Специалист-рецензент оказывает Редакции помощь в принятии решений, а при опосредственнойсвязи с авторами через редакцию, существует возможность оказания рецензентом помощи в улучшении текста работы. / Radi stručnog obrazloženja, svi članci koji odgovaraju tematici časopisa se recenziraju. Recenzenti su eminentni stručnjaci iz oblasti iz kojih su i teme radova koji im se šalju na recenziju. Potrebno je da iz tih oblasti recenzenti imaju objavljene radove u poslednje tri godine. Pre slanja na recenziju Redakcija proverava da li je sadržaj rukopisa plagijat, korišćenjem servisa iThenticate (CrossRef i CrossCheck).
Časopis primenjuje „dvostruki slepi postupak recenzije“ članaka, koji podrazumeva da autori ne znaju ko su im recenzenti, niti su recenzentima poznati autori. Redakcija dozvoljava i podstiče recenzije i posle objavljivanja članaka radi naknadnog vrednovanja autora i radova. Stručni recenzent pomaže Redakciji u donošenju odluke, a posredstvom kontakata sa autorima, preko Redakcije, može da pomogne i autorima na poboljšavanju teksta rada
Evaluation of the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin in serum, urine and tumoral tissues of female dogs suffering from mammary gland tumors
No full textIn human medicine, it has been shown recently that the level of expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in serum, urine, and breast tissue were significantly increased in patients with breast cancer and correlated to several prognostic factors. In the first part, the author presents the MMP-9 and NGAL as a synthesis of current knowledge on their ability to serve as biomarkers of breast cancer in women. In the second, the author presents the production of canine MMP9 and NGAL recombinant proteins, the production of polyclonal antibodies, and their use in various techniques (ELISA, western blot, immunohistochemistry) to assess the level of expression of these proteins in the blood, urine and breast tissue of dogs suffering from mammary gland tumors and demonstrate a positive correlation between these proteins and the presence of a tumor disease of the mammary gland
Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, Open , Vol. 18, No. 2. Fall/Winter 2017
No full textEditor’s Introduction — Ada Long
Open Forum Essays
Teaching an Honors Seminar on #BlackLivesMatter in East Texas — Ervin Malakaj, Jeffrey L. Littlejohn, Kimberly Bell, Patrick J. Lewis, and Julia D. May
Helping with the “How”: A Role for Honors in Civic Education — Craig Kaplowitz
A Part Of… or Apart From: A Reflection from South Africa — Ken Mulliken
Mental Health Needs in the Honors Community: Beyond Good Intentions — Maureen Kelleher
Research Essays
Aided by Adderall: Illicit Use of ADHD Medications by College Students — Amber D. Rolland and Patricia J. Smith
Honors Student Thriving: A Model of Academic, Psychological, and Social Wellbeing — Amanda Cuevas, Laurie A. Schreiner, Young Kim, and Jennifer Bloom
Transformative Learning: Lessons from First-Semester Honors Narratives — Kyler Knapp, Phame Camarena, and Holly Moore
Two Neglected Features of Honors Advising — Jeffrey P. Hause
Effects of Outdoor Orientation Program Participation on Honors Completion — Joanna Gonsalves
How the Implementation of Honors Sections Affects the Academic Performance of Non-Honors Students — Art L. Spisak, Sam Van Horne, and Keri C. Hornbuckle
Stimulating the Diffusion of Innovations in Honors Education: Three Factors — Inge Otto and Chris de Kruif
Moving from Forecast to Prediction: How Honors Programs Can Use Easily Accessible Predictive Analytics to Improve Enrollment Management — Joseph A. Cazier, Leslie Sargent Jones, Jennifer McGee, Mark Jacobs, Daniel Paprocki, and Rachel A. Sledge
Institutional Variability in Honors Admissions Standards, Program Support Structures, and Student Characteristics, Persistence, and Program Completion — Andrew J. Cognard-Black, Patricia J. Smith, and April L. Dove
About the Author
