1,720,978 research outputs found
Review of Indian Allacta Saussure & Zehntner, 1895 (Blattodea: Ectobiidae Pseudophyllodromiinae), with description of three new species
No full textSenraj, M., Packiam, S. Maria, Prabakaran, S., Lucanas, Cristian C., Jaiswal, Deepa (2021): Review of Indian Allacta Saussure & Zehntner, 1895 (Blattodea: Ectobiidae Pseudophyllodromiinae), with description of three new species. Zootaxa 4920 (2): 254-266, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4920.2.
Fig. 14 in Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae)
No full textFig. 14. Habitats ofSpiralothelphusa andhra sp. nov. in the Penna River, nearApparaopalem-Perumallapadu Bridge of Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh, South India. A. Habitat dominated with Typha angustata Bory & Chaub. B. Habitat dominated with Saccharum spontaneum Linnaeus.Published as part of Pati, Sameer K., Mandal, Sudipta & Jaiswal, Deepa, 2022, Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae), pp. 1-29 in European Journal of Taxonomy 798 on page 25, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1629, http://zenodo.org/record/629979
Fig. 10 in Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae)
No full textFig. 10. Spiralothelphusa andhra sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (37.8 × 30.2 mm) (ZSI-FBRC INV/2256). A. Thoracic sternites with G1 in situ (right G1 removed). B. Pleon. C. Right G1, dorsal view. D. Right G1, ventral view. E. Right G2. Scale bars: A–B = 5 mm, C–E = 1 mm.Published as part of Pati, Sameer K., Mandal, Sudipta & Jaiswal, Deepa, 2022, Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae), pp. 1-29 in European Journal of Taxonomy 798 on page 19, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1629, http://zenodo.org/record/629979
FIGURE 1 in Parapsilorhynchus alluriensis, a new species of cyprinid fish (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the Eastern Ghats, of India
No full textFIGURE 1. Distribution of the species of Parapsilorhynchus in Peninsular IndiaPublished as part of Jadhav, S. S., Karuthapandi, M., Chandra, Kailash, Jaiswal, Deepa, Dinesh, K. P. & Narahari, A., 2020, Parapsilorhynchus alluriensis, a new species of cyprinid fish (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the Eastern Ghats, of India, pp. 563-574 in Zootaxa 4751 (3) on page 567, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4751.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/371479
Fig. 7. Telson and G1 in Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae)
No full textFig. 7. Telson and G1 in Spiralothelphusa species showing diagnostic features. – A, F, I. Spiralothelphusa gibberosa Pati & Sudha Devi, 2015, holotype, ♂ (28.0 × 23.0 mm) (ZSI-WRC C.1186). – B, K, M. S. wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862). B. ♂ (37.5 × 27.1 mm) (ZSI-WRC C.1960). K, M. Lectotype, ♂ (37.4 × 28.5 mm) (NHMW CR 27063). – C. S. hydrodroma (Herbst, 1794), topotype, ♂ (27.2 × 21.4 mm) (ZMUC CRU 2824). – D, G. S. senex (Fabricius, 1798), lectotype, ♂ (25.9 × 20.3 mm) (ZMUC CRU 4626). – E, H. S. fernandoi Ng, 1994, holotype, ♂ (35.7 × 26.5 mm) (ZRC 1984.7547). – J. S. parvula (Fernando, 1961), paratype, ♂ (19.4 × 15.0 mm) (ZRC 1984.7887). – L, N. S. andhra sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (37.8 × 30.2 mm) (ZSI-FBRC INV/2256). A–B. Left G1, apical view. C, L. Right G1, dorsal view (horizontally flipped). D–F, J–K. Left G1, dorsal view. G–I, M–N. Pleonal somite 6 and telson. Scale bars: A–F, J–L = 1 mm; G–I, M–N = 5 mm. C–E, G–H, J adapted from Ng & Tay (2001) and I is adapted from Pati & Sudha Devi (2015).Published as part of Pati, Sameer K., Mandal, Sudipta & Jaiswal, Deepa, 2022, Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae), pp. 1-29 in European Journal of Taxonomy 798 on page 16, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1629, http://zenodo.org/record/629979
Spiralothelphusa Bott 1968
No full textIllustrated key to the species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968 1. G1 with longitudinally less strongly twisted (half turn) terminal segment and distal portion of subterminal segment (Fig. 7A).......................................................................................................... 2 – G1 with longitudinally more strongly twisted (full turn) terminal segment and distal portion of subterminal segment (Fig. 7B).......................................................................................................... 5 2. G1 tip gently curved upwards (Fig. 7C); G1 non-twisted portion with gently curved outer margin (Fig. 7C)...................................................................... Spiralothelphusa hydrodroma (Herbst, 1794) – G1 tip almost straight to gently hooked downwards (Fig. 7D–F); G1 non-twisted portion with strongly or sharply curved outer margin (Fig. 7D–F)........................................................................ 3 3. Male telson with gently concave lateral margins (Fig. 7G); G1 non-twisted portion with sharply curved outer margin (Fig. 7D).......................................... Spiralothelphusa senex (Fabricius, 1798) – Male telson with straight lateral margins (Fig. 7H–I); G1 non-twisted portion with regularly curved outer margin (Fig. 7E–F)................................................................................................................... 4 4. Male pleonal somite 6 relatively narrower, proximal width circa 1.3 times medial length (Fig. 7H); male telson equal in length to male pleonal somite 6 (Fig. 7H); G1 non-twisted portion with relatively less strongly convex outer margin (Fig. 7E)........................... Spiralothelphusa fernandoi Ng, 1994 – Male pleonal somite 6 relatively broader, proximal width circa 1.6 times medial length (Fig. 7I); male telson slightly longer than male pleonal somite 6 (Fig. 7I); G1 non-twisted portion with relatively more strongly convex, hump-like outer margin (Fig. 7F).......................................................................................................................................... Spiralothelphusa gibberosa Pati & Sudha Devi, 2015 5. G1 relatively stout, with tip strongly curved upwards (Fig. 7J)................................................................................................................................................. Spiralothelphusa parvula (Fernando, 1961) – G1 relatively slender, with tip gently hooked downwards (Fig. 7K–L)............................................ 6 6. Male telson with concave lateral margins (Fig. 7M); G1 non-twisted portion with outer margin sharply, relatively less strongly curved and straight towards base (Fig. 7K).......................................................................................................................... Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) – Male telson with almost straight lateral margins (Fig. 7N); G1 non-twisted portion with outer margin regularly, relatively more strongly curved and distinctly notched towards base (Fig. 7L)........................................................................................................................ Spiralothelphusa andhra sp. nov.Published as part of Pati, Sameer K., Mandal, Sudipta & Jaiswal, Deepa, 2022, Description of a new species of Spiralothelphusa Bott, 1968, and redescription of Spiralothelphusa wuellerstorfi (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinucidae), pp. 1-29 in European Journal of Taxonomy 798 on page 24, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1629, http://zenodo.org/record/629979
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
