1,720,998 research outputs found
Butterfly extirpations, discoveries and rediscoveries in Singapore over 28 years
No full textJain, Anuj, Khoon, Khew Sin, Gan, Cheong Weei, Webb, Edward L. (2018): Butterfly extirpations, discoveries and rediscoveries in Singapore over 28 years. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66: 217-257, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.535853
Fig. 1 in Butterfly extirpations, discoveries and rediscoveries in Singapore over 28 years
No full textFig. 1. Vegetation cover change and the number of butterfly species in Singapore from 1819–2017. The percentages of vegetation cover change from 1819–1990 were extracted with permission from Corlett (1992) and extended till 2017 using Yee et al. (2011) and NParks (2017). Agricultural land included tree crops such as rubber; managed vegetation included parks, gardens, and turf. The vegetation cover area under each habitat type was calculated by the area between any of the two vegetation cover lines marked in grey. Species were defined as extirpated in 1956 if they were not recorded for 30 years (shown in grey rectangle) by Corbet & Pendlebury (1956). Forty-nine and 144 butterfly species were not recorded since 1926 and 1990 respectively as shown by the blue line. Nine species could be additionally ('potentially') extirpated since 1990 (as indicated by the blue shaded area). An increase in the number of extirpated & extant species was due to new species discoveries (new country records) and rediscoveries since 1956. Fleming (1975, 1991) added new country records till 1975, but they did not report any extirpations. Therefore, the number of extant species in 1975 was unknown (as indicated by the green dotted line).Published as part of Jain, Anuj, Khoon, Khew Sin, Gan, Cheong Weei & Webb, Edward L., 2018, Butterfly extirpations, discoveries and rediscoveries in Singapore over 28 years, pp. 217-257 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66 on page 219, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.535853
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
