1,721,193 research outputs found

    Unidentified Medicii-Regii greek codices

    No full text
    Jackson Donald-F. Unidentified Medicii-Regii greek codices. In: Scriptorium, Tome 54 n°1, 2000. pp. 197-208

    Fabio Vigili's Inventory of Medici Greek manuscripts

    No full text
    Jackson Donald-F. Fabio Vigili's Inventory of Medici Greek manuscripts. In: Scriptorium, Tome 52 n°1, 1998. pp. 199-204

    Janus Lascaris on the Island of Corfu in A. D. 1491

    No full text
    Jackson Donald-F. Janus Lascaris on the Island of Corfu in A. D. 1491. In: Scriptorium, Tome 57 n°1, 2003. pp. 137-139

    A List of the Greek MSS of Domenico Grimani

    No full text
    Jackson Donald-F. A List of the Greek MSS of Domenico Grimani. In: Scriptorium, Tome 62 n°1, 2008. pp. 164-169

    Greek Manuscripts of the de Mesmes Family

    No full text
    Jackson Donald-F. Greek Manuscripts of the de Mesmes Family. In: Scriptorium, Tome 63 n°1, 2009. pp. 89-121

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    The Sources of Beinecke Manuscript 269

    No full text
    Beinecke 269 in the Yale University Library is a composite manuscript containing scholia to Oppian's Haliéutica written by Andreas Darmarios on two separate occasions from two different sources. Evidence is here provided to prove these facts, as is information concerning the position of these scholia in the overall manuscript tradition.Le ms. Beinecke 269 de la bibliothèque de l'Université de Yale est un manuscrit composite renfermant des scholia de l'Halieutica copiés par Andreas Darmarios en deux temps utilisant deux sources différentes. Des preuves sont fournies ici pour soutenir cette thèse ainsi que des renseignements se rapportant à la position de ces scholia dans la tradition manuscrite.Leverenz Lynn, Jackson Donald F. The Sources of Beinecke Manuscript 269. In: Revue d'histoire des textes, bulletin n°22 (1992), 1992. pp. 289-291

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore