1,721,511 research outputs found
Letter from W. J. Roux to T. B. Larimore
Get PDFLetter from W. J. Roux to T. B. Larimore. The two-page handwritten letter is dated 12 November 1912. There is a transcript of the correspondence in the item PDF
Caridina demani J. Roux 1911
No full text<i>Caridina demani</i> J. Roux, 1911 <p>(Figs. 2A–D)</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> 1 male, cl 3.70 mm, 2 ovigerous females, cl 4.40–4.50 mm (ZMB 29467), Papua New Guinea, Sadaun, Bewani Stn., stream at base of Bewani Mountains, 200–300m, 03°05.130’S 141°10.227’E; leg. M. Balke and K. Sagata, 12.IV.2006.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Rostrum (Fig. 2A) straight, reaching to end of scaphocerite, 0.78–0.90 times as long as carapace, armed dorsally with 17 to 20 teeth including 2 or 3 on carapace posterior to orbital margin, terminal one-third of rostrum unarmed, 4 or 5 small ventral teeth. Pterygostomial angle broadly rounded. Antennular peduncle 0.70–0.83 times as long as carapace. Stylocerite 0.84–0.95 times as long as the basal segment of antennular peduncle. Carpus of first pereiopod (Fig. 2B) 1.45–1.54 times as long as wide, distally excavated; chela 1.81-1.96 times as long as wide; dactylus 1.08–1.26 times as long as palm; tips of fingers rounded. Merus of first pereiopod 1.3-1.5 times as long as ischium. Carpus of second pereiopod 3.37–3.91 times as long as wide, chela 2.08–2.29 times as long as wide, 0.88–0.91 times length of carpus; dactylus 1.25–1.39 times long as palm; tips of fingers rounded. Merus of second pereiopod 1.2–1.4 times as long as ischium. Dactylus of third pereiopod 3.50–3.64 times as long as wide (terminal spine included), terminating in 1 large claw and 5 or 6 spines on flexor margin; propodus 9.75–12.36 times long as wide, 3.86–4.25 times as long as dactylus. Fifth pereiopod slender, dactylus 4.0–5.2 times as long as wide (terminal spine included), with 1 large claw and 32-38 spines on flexor margin; propodus 10.33–11.43 times as long as wide, 3.65–4.00 long as dactylus. Epipods present on first 4 pereiopods. Endopod of male first pleopod (Fig. 2C) short, triangular, 1.4 times as long as proximal width, without appendix interna. Sixth abdominal segment 0.58–0.63 times length of carapace. Telson (Fig. 2D) 3.0 times as long as proximally wide, posterior margin rounded, without median projection, with 3 pairs of dorsal and 1 pair of dorsolateral spinules; distal end with 8–10 spines, lateral pair longer and stouter than intermediate spines. Preanal carina rounded, without a tooth or spine. Uropodal diaeresis with 12–13 movable spinules. Egg size of overigerous females 0.96–1.01 × 0.56–0.62 mm.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> <i>Caridina demani</i> is only known from some rivers in the northern part of New Guinea, especially from the rivers Tawarin (J. Roux 1911), Tami at Humboldt Bay, Tjano at Njao, Zoutbron (De Man 1915), Mamberamo (J. Roux 1927), and a stream at the base of Bewani Mt. (this study).</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> <i>Caridina demani</i> is very similar to <i>C. cognata</i> De Man, 1915. It can be distinguished from <i>C. cognata</i> by the longer, distally unarmed rostrum and fewer teeth on the ventral margin (4 or 5 vs. 7–9 in <i>C. cognata</i>), by a stouter carpus and chela of the first and second pereiopods (carpus of first pereiopod 1.5, of second pereiopod 3.4–3.9 times as long as wide vs. 1.6–2.0 and 4.0–5.2 times as long in <i>C. cognata</i>). The specimens examined correspond well to the descriptions of J. Roux (1911, 1917, 1927) and De Man (1915). Only small differences were found in egg size (0.96–1.01 × 0.56–0.62 mm vs. 0.75–0.85 × 0.40–0.80 mm), which could be due to different developmental stages, different preservation state or method of measuring; and the length to width ratio of the carpus of the first (1.45–1.50 vs. 1.60–2.00) and second pereiopod (3.47– 3.91 vs. 4.0–5.0).</p> <p> De Man (1915) described a high intraspecific variability in his material of <i>C. demani</i>. His specimens were larger than those examined by J. Roux (1911). They further showed a length to width ratio of the carpus (1.44–1.75 on the first and 3.33–4.00 on the second pereiopods and 6–9 ventral teeth on the rostrum). The measurements obtained from the three specimen in our collection fall into the range reported by De Man (1915). The differences between the type series of J. Roux (1911), the specimen reported from three different locations by De Man and our specimen should be regarded as intraspecific variation between populations from different habitats.</p>Published as part of <i>Karge, Andreas, Rintelen, Kristina Von & Klotz, Werner, 2010, On two small collections of freshwater shrimps (Decapoda: Atyidae: Caridina) from Papua New Guinea, with descriptions of two new species *, pp. 138-150 in Zootaxa 2372 (1)</i> on page 140, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2372.1.14, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5310307">http://zenodo.org/record/5310307</a>
Caridina novaecaledoniae J. Roux 1926
No full text<i>Caridina novaecaledoniae</i> J. Roux, 1926. <p>(Fig. 16)</p> <p> <i>Caridina novaecaledoniae</i> J. Roux 1926a: 214, figs. 40–46.</p> <p> <b>Material examined</b>. Types. <b>New Caledonia.</b> Tchalabel, coll. F. Sarasin & J. Roux, 3.5.1911, NMB reg. 746a, 20♂, 13♀. The word “typen” was written on the label of these specimens. 1♂ is here selected as a Lectotype and the remaining 19♂, 13♀ are given Paralectotype status. Tchalabel, coll. F. Sarasin & J. Roux, 3.5.1911, AM reg. P.7881, 2♂, are here given Paralectotype status. Tchalabel, coll. F. Sarasin & J. Roux, 3.5.1911, AM reg. P.7881, 1♂, 1♀, previously cotypes, are here given Paralectotype status.</p> <p> Non type. <b>New Caledonia.</b> ZW Diahot–Col poraris, coll. F. Sarasin & J. Roux, 6.5.1911, NMB reg. 746b: 18♂, 19♀; Grand Terre, River Tiwaka, coll. G. Marquet, 7.10.96, det. G. Marquet, MNHN reg. Na-17373, 2♂, 1♀ ovig., 1 juv.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> From the type material. Adult size 12–20 mm. Carapace length 2.5–3.5 mm.</p> <p> <i>Rostrum</i> (Fig.16 a, b): Mostly reaching 1/3 of second segment of antennular peduncle or shorter reaching end of the eye. 1.0– 2.45 mm long. 7–20 teeth on dorsal margin mostly compactly up to the tip, rarely with a short unarmed end distally, mostly 1–3 post orbital teeth present, rarely post orbital teeth absent, tip pointed, 0–5 teeth on ventral margin mostly up to the tip or with a short unarmed end. Teeth on dorsal and ventral margin are mostly minute. Formula (0–3) 7–20/0–5.</p> <p> <i>Antennular peduncle</i> (Fig. 16 a, b): 0.7–0.8×carapace. Stylocerite 0.6–0.75×length of basal segment. Anterolateral teeth of basal segment 0.1–0.20×second segment. 7–15 segments bearing aesthetascs.</p> <p> <i>First pereiopod</i> (Fig. 16 c): Dactylus 1.3–1.7×palm of propodus. Chela 2.0–2.4×long as broad. Carpus1.9–2.5×long as broad with anterior excavation.</p> <p> <i>Second pereiopod</i> (Fig. 16 d): Dactylus 1.4–1.7×long as palm of propodus. Chela 2.5–3.0×long as broad. Carpus 4.5–5.5×long as broad.</p> <p> <i>Third pereiopod</i> (Fig. 16 e, f): Dactylus 2.5–3.0×long as broad. 5–7 spines on dactylus (including terminal spine). Propodus 4.0–5.0×long as dactylus and 10–12×long as broad with 9–12 spines arranged along inner margin. Carpus 0.6–0.7×long as propodus with 2–3 minute spines on inner margin. Merus 1.5–1.7×carpus length. Merus with 3 spines on posterior margin.</p> <p> <i>Fifth pereiopod</i> (Fig. 16 g, h): Dactylus 3.4–4.5×long as broad with 55–65 spines in comb-like fashion on inner margin. Propodus 12–15×long as broad and 4.0–4.5×long as dactylus and with 12–16 spines along posterior margin. Carpus 0.45–0.6×propodus length and with 3–4 minute spines along inner margin. Merus 1.5–1.9×carpus length, with 2 large spines at posterior margin.</p> <p> <i>Setobranchs</i>: 2 setae on all pereiopods.</p> <p> <i>First male pleopod</i> (Fig. 16 i, j): endopod 0.20–0.35×exopod length. Appendix interna absent in all but one male where a distinct appendix interna present (NHM Basel, 746b, 1♂). Several long setae present along the entire margin.</p> <p> <i>First female pleopod</i>: endopod 0.45–0.70×exopod length.</p> <p> <i>Eggs</i>: ca. 43 eggs of 0.9–1.01× 0.5–0.58 mm size.</p> <p> <i>Second male pleopod</i> (Fig.16 k, l): Appendix masculina 1.6–2.0×appendix interna and 0.25–0.3×endopod.</p> <p> <i>6th abdominal somite</i>: 0.6–0.7×long as carapace.</p> <p> <i>Telson</i> (Fig. 16 m, n): Broad, 1–1.1×long as 6th abdominal somite. Dorsal spines 4–5 pairs (including subterminal spine). Posterior margin rounded with or without median process, bearing 1 pair of lateral spines and 2–3 pairs or 5 sparsely plumose spines that are almost equal in length or the median ones fractionally longer than the lateral spines.</p> <p> <i>Uropod</i> (Fig.16 o): 10–17 diaeresis spinules.</p> <p> <i>Preanal carina</i> (Fig. 16 p): Unarmed.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> New Caledonia.</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> Tchalabel, New Caledonia.</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>. Jean Roux (1926a) described <i>C</i>. <i>novaecaledoniae</i> with specimens collected from four localities in New Caledonia. The specimens from the type locality, Tchalabel, were examined in the present study. As rightly pointed out by J. Roux (1926a), the length of the rostrum exhibited notable variation, mostly reaching 1/3 of second segment of antennular peduncle or shorter reaching the end of the eyeball. 7–20 teeth on dorsal margin mostly compactly up to the tip, rarely with a short unarmed end distally; mostly 1–3 post orbital teeth present, rarely post orbital teeth absent; rostral tip pointed, 0–5 teeth on ventral margin mostly up to the tip or with a short unarmed end; rostral formula (0–3) 7–20/0–5. Posterior margin rounded with or without median process, bearing 1 pair of lateral spines and 2–3 pairs or 5 sparsely plumose spines that are almost equal in length or the median ones fractionally longer than the lateral spines. 10–17 uropod diaeresis spinules present in non type ovigerous female from Grand Terre, River Tiwaka bears 43 eggs of 0.9–1.01× 0.5–0.58 mm size.</p>Published as part of <i>Richard, Jasmine & Clark, Paul F., 2014, Caridina simoni Bouvier, 1904 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Atyoidea: Atyidae) and the synonymy by Johnson, 1963, pp. 301-338 in Zootaxa 3841 (3)</i> on pages 331-333, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3841.3.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/228244">http://zenodo.org/record/228244</a>
Question IX, (posée par M. J. Roux, Lyon). Quels liens entre labdanum et laudanum ?
No full textLogophile . Question IX, (posée par M. J. Roux, Lyon). Quels liens entre labdanum et laudanum ? . In: Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie, 39ᵉ année, n°130, 1951. p. 240
Question IX, (posée par M. J. Roux, Lyon). Quels liens entre labdanum et laudanum ?
No full textLogophile . Question IX, (posée par M. J. Roux, Lyon). Quels liens entre labdanum et laudanum ? . In: Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie, 39ᵉ année, n°130, 1951. p. 240
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Abbé J. Roux, La basilique Saint-Front de Périgueux, Périgueux, 1920. G. Millet, L'ancien art serbe ; Les églises, 1919
No full textAndrieu Michel. Abbé J. Roux, La basilique Saint-Front de Périgueux, Périgueux, 1920. G. Millet, L'ancien art serbe ; Les églises, 1919. In: Revue des Sciences Religieuses, tome 1, fascicule 4, 1921. pp. 417-422
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
