1,724,653 research outputs found
Portrait of Frank J. Foster [picture] /
No full textTitle from signature on mount.; Condition: Good.; Inscriptions: "Frank J. Foster" --Signed in ink lower centre. "The Swiss Studios, Melbourne" --Embossed lower right corner. "F. J. Foster, M.P. Member for New England in the 3rd Parl." --In pencil on reverse
James J. Foster, head and shoulers portrait
No full textPurdue University Administrative and Associations. James J. Foster, University Residences diversity and community coordinato
How I Teach: Robert J. Foster
No full textRobert J. Foster is a member of the Department of Anthropolog
Transportation map of Birmingham district : showing street car and bus lines of Birmingham Electric Company.
No full textDate taken from acquisition record.; Drawn by June Morris.; Copyright by J. Foster Ashburn, 608 S. 25th.; Includes inset of downtown area and index to car and bus lines.; Text and ill. on verso
Mr. and Mrs. H. J. Foster
No full textMr. and Mrs. H. J. Foster, 1905 Prevost, shown here, were at the Fort Worth Art Association exhibition ball. He portrayed a Rouault clown and she a Matisse dancing girl. Published in Fort Worth Star-Telegram morning edition May 9, 1954.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/32394/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
