1,720,966 research outputs found
Speech-acts Based Analysis for Requirements Discovery from Online Discussions
Full text linkOnline discussions about software applications and services that take place on web-based communication platforms represent an invaluable knowledge source for diverse software engineering tasks, including requirements elicitation. The amount of research work on developing effective tool-supported analysis methods is rapidly increasing, as part of the so called software analytics. Textual messages in App store reviews, tweets, online discussions taking place in mailing lists and user forums, are analysed by combining natural language processing techniques to filter out irrelevant data; text mining and machine learning algorithms to classify messages into different categories, such as bug report and feature request.
Our research objective is to exploit a linguistic technique based on speech-acts for the analysis of online discussions with the ultimate goal of discovering requirement-relevant information. In this paper, we present a revised and extended version of the speech-acts based analysis technique, which we previously presented at CAiSE 2017, together with a detailed experimental characterisation of its properties. Datasets used in the experimental evaluation are taken from a widely used open source software project (161120 textual comments), as well as from an industrial project in the home energy management domain. We make them available for experiment replication purposes. On these datasets, our approach is able to successfully classify messages into Feature/Enhancement and Other, with F-measure of 0.81 and 0.84 respectively. We also found evidence that there is an association between types of speech-acts and categories of issues, and that there is correlation between some of the speech-acts and issue priority, thus motivating further research on the exploitation of our speech-acts based analysis technique in semi-automated multi-criteria requirements prioritisation
Requirements Analysis Skills: How to Train Practitioners?
Full text linkOne of the goals of any software development organization (SDO) is the assurance of a high quality software. To achieve this, it is important to perform all the software related activities, especially those of the requirements engineering (RE) phase, in the right way and ideally by experts.
However, the current practice reveals that this crucial phase is commonly performed by people with limited experience in RE, indeed, some of them ignoring the basic activities. We present a training plan in order to improve practitioners’ RE analysis skills. The training plan was applied to 44 practitioners working at a Mexican SDO.
We developed such a plan based on the idea of considering six main dimensions that include theory, tests and mentoring sessions. The so called dimensions are: understanding the organization’s domain, basic concepts of RE, requirements elicitation, requirements expression, requirements prioritization and requirements analysis.
In this paper, we present what are the topics discussed in each dimension, the feedback received by the practitioners after the training and how we envision the evolution of the training plan
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
