1,720,958 research outputs found
Hvordan deler psykologer på BUP følelser fra terapirommet med kollegaer og i private relasjoner?
Studien undersøker hvordan psykologer på BUP deler belastende og gode følelsesmessige opplevelser fra sitt kliniske arbeid, med kollegaer på arbeidsplassen og i private relasjoner. Ni psykologer, tre menn og seks kvinner, deltok i kvalitative intervjuer. Psykologene var ansatt på fem ulike BUP-klinikker og hadde 3.5 til 35 års erfaring. Funnene indikerer at psykologer har behov for å dele belastninger fra sitt kliniske arbeid. De ønsker i hovedsak å få dekket dette behovet på jobb, fremfor å dele hjemme. De forteller om få strukturelle ordninger for å dele følelsesmessige belastninger på arbeidsplassene, slik at delingen oftest foregår med kollegaer i uformelle settinger. I private relasjoner er det få som deler følelsesmessige belastninger fra jobb, annet enn generelle kommentarer om hvordan dagen har vært. Belastninger fra jobben deles i større grad enn gode følelser, både med kollegaer og i private relasjoner. Gode følelser fra det kliniske arbeidet deles nesten utelukkende med kollegaer som er involvert i eller kjenner til saken. Psykologene rapporterer at mangel på tid hindrer dem både i å dele belastninger og positive følelser uformelt med kollegaer. Fremtidig forskning bør undersøke mer utdypende hvilke konsekvenser det har at psykologer i liten grad deler gode følelser fra det kliniske arbeidet. Forskning bør også undersøke eventuell effekt av strukturelle fora på arbeidsplassen der man deler opplevelser, samt konsekvenser av manglende muligheter til å dele uformelt med kollegaer
Håndbok i studiegrupper om vold
The first part of this manual gives a description of form, contents, objective, method and theoretical superstructure. The second part gives a concrete description of the contents of the different group meetings.
The manual presupposes familiarity with the books
Meningen med volden (Isdal 2000) and Håndbok i samtalegrupper for voldsdømte (Isdal & Dammann 2003).
The ATV-model of treatment has four leading principals, which are realized in the 13 topics of the study-groups:
1. Focus on violence
2. Focus on responsibility
3. Focus on coherence
4. Focus on effect and consequence
The study-groups are a furthering of the conversation-groups – ideally a step II for participants who have already followed a conversation group.
The study-group can give new motivation to those who like and are suited for groups of the ATV-type. The observance of professional secrecy is the same for both groups.
The short version of the study-group constitutes 15-18 group meetings, the long version 30-35 meetings. The size of the group can vary from 3-10 participants - the ideal being 4-5.
The study-group follows a defined plan of progress throughout the 13 topics, which build on each other. For this reason, the groups should be closed.
Conversation against violence is the principal idea behind both the conversation-groups and the study-groups – at ATV we consider ability to express thoughts and feelings in words as the most important alternative to violence. The objective of the study-group is for the participants to gain a larger understanding of violence, both as a
phenomenon of society and in their own lives, through a structured process. Hence, the study-groups does not direct change of behavior, but are instead directed towards conditions we think might have an impact on violent behavior. The study-groups are part of the empowerment tradition, and behind this lies a belief in that everybody can change if they have the knowledge, skills and motivation necessary to make different choices.
The method in use is psycho-educative – awareness through education - and focuses directly on the area of problems, in this case violence (except for violence comprised by the law of sexual crime, although exceptions are made). The approach is based on the view that violence to a large degree is a problem of attitude and awareness.
The study-group is to be lead by two group-leaders, who have a double function: as teachers they are to create a pedagogical process, and as leaders they are responsible for contact with the establishment as well as registration and reporting. The group leaders are to work together as a team. It is also a central point that the group-leaders are able to receive the participant’s stories in a non-judgmental, understanding, warm, listening and supportive manner.
It is a presupposition that the participants master the Norwegian language well, and it is necessary to know that the participants are able to follow the whole process. It is not desirable with participants only partaking a few times, or participants who partake on an irregular basis.
Timing is essential. When a successful therapy with inmates is finished many years in advance of release, the remaining time of the serving might destroy the effect of the treatment. Treatment should ideally continue for a period after release. Choice of room signals how important the establishment considers the study-group to be. The group should meet in a suitable room where the participants can talk undisturbed. It is not recommended to use classrooms
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Håndbok i studiegrupper om vold
Psykolog Per Isdal har i samarbeid med Ila fengsel-, forvarings- og sikringsanstalt utviklet en ny metode for påvirkningsarbeid i forhold til innsatte og friomsorgsklienter med voldsproblematikk. Denne håndboken i studiegrupper om vold tar utgangspunkt i Håndbok for samtalegrupper for voldsdømte (Isdal & Dammann 2003) og er også en videreføring av denne metodikken. Målet med denne kursbaserte nye håndboken er at tilsatte i kriminalomsorgen som både tidligere har drevet samtalegrupper etter ATV-modellen og har gjennomgått spesialutdanning for samtalegruppeledere, kan igangsette en studiegruppe i vold. I samarbeid med Baar Bias Dammen, Kjersti Bergerud og Halvor Killingstad.The first part of this manual gives a description of form, contents, objective, method and theoretical superstructure. The second part gives a concrete description of the contents of the different group meetings.
The manual presupposes familiarity with the books
Meningen med volden (Isdal 2000) and Håndbok i samtalegrupper for voldsdømte (Isdal & Dammann 2003).
The ATV-model of treatment has four leading principals, which are realized in the 13 topics of the study-groups:
1. Focus on violence
2. Focus on responsibility
3. Focus on coherence
4. Focus on effect and consequence
The study-groups are a furthering of the conversation-groups – ideally a step II for participants who have already followed a conversation group.
The study-group can give new motivation to those who like and are suited for groups of the ATV-type. The observance of professional secrecy is the same for both groups.
The short version of the study-group constitutes 15-18 group meetings, the long version 30-35 meetings. The size of the group can vary from 3-10 participants - the ideal being 4-5.
The study-group follows a defined plan of progress throughout the 13 topics, which build on each other. For this reason, the groups should be closed.
Conversation against violence is the principal idea behind both the conversation-groups and the study-groups – at ATV we consider ability to express thoughts and feelings in words as the most important alternative to violence. The objective of the study-group is for the participants to gain a larger understanding of violence, both as a
phenomenon of society and in their own lives, through a structured process. Hence, the study-groups does not direct change of behavior, but are instead directed towards conditions we think might have an impact on violent behavior. The study-groups are part of the empowerment tradition, and behind this lies a belief in that everybody can change if they have the knowledge, skills and motivation necessary to make different choices.
The method in use is psycho-educative – awareness through education - and focuses directly on the area of problems, in this case violence (except for violence comprised by the law of sexual crime, although exceptions are made). The approach is based on the view that violence to a large degree is a problem of attitude and awareness.
The study-group is to be lead by two group-leaders, who have a double function: as teachers they are to create a pedagogical process, and as leaders they are responsible for contact with the establishment as well as registration and reporting. The group leaders are to work together as a team. It is also a central point that the group-leaders are able to receive the participant’s stories in a non-judgmental, understanding, warm, listening and supportive manner.
It is a presupposition that the participants master the Norwegian language well, and it is necessary to know that the participants are able to follow the whole process. It is not desirable with participants only partaking a few times, or participants who partake on an irregular basis.
Timing is essential. When a successful therapy with inmates is finished many years in advance of release, the remaining time of the serving might destroy the effect of the treatment. Treatment should ideally continue for a period after release. Choice of room signals how important the establishment considers the study-group to be. The group should meet in a suitable room where the participants can talk undisturbed. It is not recommended to use classrooms
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
