1,721,012 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
ii Ion Mandoiu
I most especially thank my advisor, Ion Măndoiu, without whom this work would not have been done. For giving me the opportunity to study here, for all his tireless help, for invaluable advice and suggestions, I am most grateful to him. I also want to express my gratitude to my former advisor at the A.I.Cuza University of Ia¸si, Ferucio Laurent¸iu T ¸ iplea, for believing in me. Additionally, I would like to thank my associate advisors, Laurent Michel and Alexan-der Russell, for serving on my examination committee and also my colleagues, Jin Jun and Bogdan Pa¸saniuc, for kindly reviewing part of this thesis. Finally, I acknowledge the constant support and encouragements I have received from my family and friends. iii After the completion of the Human Genome Project has provided a blueprint of the DNA present in each human cell, genomics research is now focusing on the study of DNA variations that occur between individuals, seeking to understand how these variation
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Discrete Algorithms for Analysis of Genotype Data
Accessibility of high-throughput genotyping technology makes possible genome-wide association studies for common complex diseases. When dealing with common diseases, it is necessary to search and analyze multiple independent causes resulted from interactions of multiple genes scattered over the entire genome. The optimization formulations for searching disease-associated risk/resistant factors and predicting disease susceptibility for given case-control study have been introduced. Several discrete methods for disease association search exploiting greedy strategy and topological properties of case-control studies have been developed. New disease susceptibility prediction methods based on the developed search methods have been validated on datasets from case-control studies for several common diseases. Our experiments compare favorably the proposed algorithms with the existing association search and susceptibility prediction methods
Algorithms for Transcriptome Quantification and Reconstruction from RNA-Seq Data
Massively parallel whole transcriptome sequencing and its ability to generate full transcriptome data at the single transcript level provides a powerful tool with multiple interrelated applications, including transcriptome reconstruction, gene/isoform expression estimation, also known as transcriptome quantification. As a result, whole transcriptome sequencing has become the technology of choice for performing transcriptome analysis, rapidly replacing array-based technologies. The most commonly used transcriptome sequencing protocol, referred to as RNA-Seq, generates short (single or paired) sequencing tags from the ends of randomly generated cDNA fragments. RNA-Seq protocol reduces the sequencing cost and significantly increases data throughput, but is computationally challenging to reconstruct full-length transcripts and accurately estimate their abundances across all cell types.
We focus on two main problems in transcriptome data analysis, namely, transcriptome reconstruction and quantification. Transcriptome reconstruction, also referred to as novel isoform discovery, is the problem of reconstructing the transcript sequences from the sequencing data. Reconstruction can be done de novo or it can be assisted by existing genome and transcriptome annotations. Transcriptome quantification refers to the problem of estimating the expression level of each transcript. We present a genome-guided and annotation-guided transcriptome reconstruction methods as well as methods for transcript and gene expression level estimation. Empirical results on both synthetic and real RNA-seq datasets show that the proposed methods improve transcriptome quantification and reconstruction accuracy compared to previous methods
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
