1,721,097 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Science and speculation in Freud : focusing on the epistemological discussions in 1914-1915

    No full text
    1914年の「精神分析運動の雅史のために」において, フロイトはアドラーとユングの理論を経験的観察に基づかない「思弁」とみなし、何度も観察を反復して結論を出すことを遅らせる自身の科学的方法から区別している. フロイトの方法論はさらに同年のの「ナルシシズムの導入にむけて」, 翌年の「欲動と欲動運命」において定式化されるが, そこでは彼自身の欲動二元論を保持するために, 精神分析固有の経験に由来しない観念を導入し, 展開していくことが正当化されてもいる. こうした動向が1910年代後半の公刊されなかった試みを経て, 「快原理の彼岸」(1920)におけるフロイト自身の思弁へ発展していくことを示すのが本稿の目的である.In On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement (1914) , Freud considers Adlerian and Jungian theories as speculations without observational basis and distinguishes them from his own scientific method repeating observations and avoiding hasty conclusions. However, in other papers written in that same period On Narcissism : An Introduction (1914) und Instincts and their Vicissitudes (1915)-, Freud also tries to justify the adoption and unfolding of notions not obtained from psychoanalytic experience per se in order to support his dualistic theory of the drive. This paper aims to show that such an epistemological discussion has contributed to the formation of Freud's own speculation in Beyond the pleasure principle (1920)

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    生態学的実在論に基づく意味論に関する研究―理論的考察と実践的言語記述―

    Full text link
    京都大学新制・課程博士博士(人間・環境学)甲第24700号人博第1073号新制||人||251(附属図書館)2022||人博||1073(吉田南総合図書館)京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科共生人間学専攻(主査)教授 谷口 一美, 教授 藤田 耕司, 准教授 守田 貴弘, 教授 山梨 正明学位規則第4条第1項該当Doctor of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityDGA

    A Descriptive Study on the Locative Expression in the Ainu Language: From the Viewpoint of Cognitive Linguistics

    No full text
    本稿では、アイヌ語の「場所表現」と呼ばれる文法的制約の構文的意味について考察する。アイヌ語では通常、名詞(句)と格助詞が共起する際には、その間に位置名詞(positional noun)を挿入する必要がある。この文法的制約を受けた表現は「場所表現」と呼ばれている(田村 1982, 中川 1984)。また、アイヌ語の場所表現の中で現れる名詞句は定表現でなければならないということが井筒 (2006)によって指摘されている。しかし、先行研究では、特に場所表現で現れる場所名詞(名詞節を形成する役割を持つ形式名詞、地名、それ以外の「語彙的場所名詞」)についての統一的な記述はなされていない。本稿は、まず2節で場所表現の文法的制約に関して先行研究でどのように記述されてきたのかを概観したのち、3節以降から、Langacker(1991, 2008)の「参照点構造」の概念を援用しつつ、場所名詞を含めた場所表現で示される概念構造1について、定性の観点から分析していく。4節では、認知言語学における「構文」(Lakoff 1987, Taylor 1989)の視点から、井筒(2006)で示唆されている「定表現」を場所表現のスキーマ的な意味として捉え、それぞれの名詞において実現されている用法を、具体化された構文として記述する。5節では、本論文のまとめと展望を述べる。 This paper examines the semantic structure of the grammatical phenomenon called “locative expression” in the Ainu language from the viewpoint of Cognitive Grammar. In the Ainu language, a noun with locative case takes a positional noun, as in “cise oske ta ku=an” [house inside LOC 1SG=be] ‘I am inside the house.’ On the other hand, there are three cases where such positional nouns are not needed: (i) when used with a preceding demonstrative pronoun, (ii) in a possessive form with a personal affix, (iii) so-called “locative nouns, ” which semantically indicate locations, including place names. From a cognitive point of view, there are several studies on this issue. Tamura (2003) argues that it is possible to omit a positional noun when the word indicates “realm concept” in its conceptual structure and therefore the possessive form indicates the concept of “spatial realm.” Izutsu (2006), on the other hand, claims that the personal affix behaves as a RP (= Reference Point) to indicate a certain spatial realm as a target. The latter analysis employing a RP works fine, but it gives no explanation of the case of “locative nouns” in (iii), especially place names, which seem to indicate no spatial realm or any spatial entity as a RP. Throughout the reanalysis onf all cases, it is shown that the expressions of place in the Ainu language have a RPS (= Reference-Point Structure) to indicate a certain spatial realm or place as a target, which renders the noun phrases definite enough to appear in locative expression. This study shows that the schematic meaning of definiteness is realized as the same conceptual/semantic structure of specification of a target from spatial dominion, which is expressed by different syntactic sub-constructions. It also shows that some Conceptual Metaphors (Lakoff and Johnson 1980, Lakoff 1987) are involved in relation of these sub-constructions

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore